[article] 
inJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 59-8 (August 2018) . - p.831-844

Titre :	Research Review: Cognitive bias modification of interpretations in youth and its effect on anxiety: a meta-analysis
Type de document :	Texte imprimé et/ou numérique
Auteurs :	G. KREBS, Auteur ; V. PILE, Auteur ; S. GRANT, Auteur ; M. DEGLI ESPOSTI, Auteur ; P. MONTGOMERY, Auteur ; J. Y. F. LAU, Auteur
Article en page(s) :	p.831-844
Langues :	Anglais (eng)
Mots-clés :	Cognitive bias modification  adolescents  anxiety  children  interpretation bias training
Index. décimale :	PER Périodiques
Résumé :	BACKGROUND: Emerging evidence suggests that cognitive bias modification of interpretations (CBM-I) is effective in altering interpretation biases and reducing anxiety in adults. Less is known about the impact of CBM-I in young people, but some recent findings, including a meta-analysis of combined cognitive bias modification of interpretation and attention techniques, have cast doubt on its clinical utility. Given the current debate, this meta-analysis sought to establish the independent effects of CBM-I on interpretations biases and anxiety in youth. METHODS: Studies were identified through a systematic literature search of PsycINFO, Ovid MEDLINE, PsycARTICLES, Web of Science and EMBASE between January 1992 and March 2017. Eligible studies aimed to target interpretation biases; did not combine CBM-I with another intervention; included a control condition; randomly allocated participants to conditions; assessed interpretation bias and/or anxiety as an outcome; included individuals up to age 18; and did not present previously reported data. Reference lists of included articles were checked for further eligible studies, and authors were contacted for unpublished data. RESULTS: We identified 26 studies meeting eligibility criteria that included in the meta-analysis. CBM-I had moderate effects on negative and positive interpretations (g = -0.70 and g = -0.52, respectively) and a small but significant effect on anxiety assessed after training (g = -0.17) and after a stressor (g = -0.34). No significant moderators were identified. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to previous meta-analytic findings, our results indicate that CBM-I has potential but weak anxiolytic effects in youth. Our findings suggest that it may be premature to disregard the potential value of CBM-I research and further research in this field is warranted.
En ligne :	http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12809
Permalink :	https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=368

[article] Research Review: Cognitive bias modification of interpretations in youth and its effect on anxiety: a meta-analysis [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / G. KREBS, Auteur ; V. PILE, Auteur ; S. GRANT, Auteur ; M. DEGLI ESPOSTI, Auteur ; P. MONTGOMERY, Auteur ; J. Y. F. LAU, Auteur . - p.831-844.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 59-8 (August 2018) . - p.831-844

Mots-clés :	Cognitive bias modification  adolescents  anxiety  children  interpretation bias training
Index. décimale :	PER Périodiques
Résumé :	BACKGROUND: Emerging evidence suggests that cognitive bias modification of interpretations (CBM-I) is effective in altering interpretation biases and reducing anxiety in adults. Less is known about the impact of CBM-I in young people, but some recent findings, including a meta-analysis of combined cognitive bias modification of interpretation and attention techniques, have cast doubt on its clinical utility. Given the current debate, this meta-analysis sought to establish the independent effects of CBM-I on interpretations biases and anxiety in youth. METHODS: Studies were identified through a systematic literature search of PsycINFO, Ovid MEDLINE, PsycARTICLES, Web of Science and EMBASE between January 1992 and March 2017. Eligible studies aimed to target interpretation biases; did not combine CBM-I with another intervention; included a control condition; randomly allocated participants to conditions; assessed interpretation bias and/or anxiety as an outcome; included individuals up to age 18; and did not present previously reported data. Reference lists of included articles were checked for further eligible studies, and authors were contacted for unpublished data. RESULTS: We identified 26 studies meeting eligibility criteria that included in the meta-analysis. CBM-I had moderate effects on negative and positive interpretations (g = -0.70 and g = -0.52, respectively) and a small but significant effect on anxiety assessed after training (g = -0.17) and after a stressor (g = -0.34). No significant moderators were identified. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to previous meta-analytic findings, our results indicate that CBM-I has potential but weak anxiolytic effects in youth. Our findings suggest that it may be premature to disregard the potential value of CBM-I research and further research in this field is warranted.
En ligne :	http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12809
Permalink :	https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=368