[article] 
inJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 62-3 (March 2021) . - p.339-348

Titre :	School quality ratings are weak predictors of students' achievement and well-being
Type de document :	Texte imprimé et/ou numérique
Auteurs :	Sophie VON STUMM, Auteur ; Emily SMITH-WOOLLEY, Auteur ; Rosa CHEESMAN, Auteur ; Jean-Baptiste PINGAULT, Auteur ; Kathryn ASBURY, Auteur ; Philip S. DALE, Auteur ; Rebecca ALLEN, Auteur ; Yulia KOVAS, Auteur ; Robert PLOMIN, Auteur
Article en page(s) :	p.339-348
Langues :	Anglais (eng)
Mots-clés :	Ofsted  School quality  educational achievement  school engagement  well-being
Index. décimale :	PER Périodiques
Résumé :	BACKGROUND: In England, all state-funded schools are inspected by an independent government agency, the Office for Standards in Education, Children's Services and Skills (Ofsted). Inspections aim to hold schools accountable and to promote the improvement of education, with the results made available to the public. Ofsted reports intend to index school quality, but their influence on students' individual outcomes has not been previously studied. The aim of the current study was to explore the extent to which school quality, as indexed by Ofsted ratings, is associated with students' educational achievement, well-being and school engagement. METHODS: We use an England population-based sample of 4,391 individuals, for whom school performance at age 11 and GCSE grades at age 16 were accessed from the National Pupil Database, and who completed measures of well-being and school engagement at age 16. RESULTS: We found that Ofsted ratings of secondary school quality accounted for 4% of the variance in students' educational achievement at age 16, which was further reduced to 1% of the variance after we accounted for prior school performance at age 11 and family socioeconomic status. Furthermore, Ofsted ratings were weak predictors of school engagement and student well-being, with an average correlation of .03. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that differences in school quality, as indexed by Ofsted ratings, have little relation to students' individual outcomes. Accordingly, our results challenge the usefulness of Ofsted ratings as guides for parents and students when choosing secondary schools.
En ligne :	http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13276
Permalink :	https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=443

[article] School quality ratings are weak predictors of students' achievement and well-being [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Sophie VON STUMM, Auteur ; Emily SMITH-WOOLLEY, Auteur ; Rosa CHEESMAN, Auteur ; Jean-Baptiste PINGAULT, Auteur ; Kathryn ASBURY, Auteur ; Philip S. DALE, Auteur ; Rebecca ALLEN, Auteur ; Yulia KOVAS, Auteur ; Robert PLOMIN, Auteur . - p.339-348.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 62-3 (March 2021) . - p.339-348

Mots-clés :	Ofsted  School quality  educational achievement  school engagement  well-being
Index. décimale :	PER Périodiques
Résumé :	BACKGROUND: In England, all state-funded schools are inspected by an independent government agency, the Office for Standards in Education, Children's Services and Skills (Ofsted). Inspections aim to hold schools accountable and to promote the improvement of education, with the results made available to the public. Ofsted reports intend to index school quality, but their influence on students' individual outcomes has not been previously studied. The aim of the current study was to explore the extent to which school quality, as indexed by Ofsted ratings, is associated with students' educational achievement, well-being and school engagement. METHODS: We use an England population-based sample of 4,391 individuals, for whom school performance at age 11 and GCSE grades at age 16 were accessed from the National Pupil Database, and who completed measures of well-being and school engagement at age 16. RESULTS: We found that Ofsted ratings of secondary school quality accounted for 4% of the variance in students' educational achievement at age 16, which was further reduced to 1% of the variance after we accounted for prior school performance at age 11 and family socioeconomic status. Furthermore, Ofsted ratings were weak predictors of school engagement and student well-being, with an average correlation of .03. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that differences in school quality, as indexed by Ofsted ratings, have little relation to students' individual outcomes. Accordingly, our results challenge the usefulness of Ofsted ratings as guides for parents and students when choosing secondary schools.
En ligne :	http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13276
Permalink :	https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=443