Does the Incredible Years reduce child externalizing problems through improved parenting? The role of child negative affectivity and serotonin transporter linked polymorphic region (5-HTTLPR) genotype / Joyce WEELAND in Development and Psychopathology, 30-1 (February 2018)  

Public ISBD [article]  inDevelopment and Psychopathology > 30-1 (February 2018) . - p.93-112 Titre : Does the Incredible Years reduce child externalizing problems through improved parenting? The role of child negative affectivity and serotonin transporter linked polymorphic region (5-HTTLPR) genotype Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Joyce WEELAND, Auteur ; Rabia R. CHHANGUR, Auteur ; Sara R. JAFFEE, Auteur ; Danielle VAN DER GIESSEN, Auteur ; Walter MATTHYS, Auteur ; Bram OROBIO DE CASTRO, Auteur ; Geertjan OVERBEEK, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.93-112 Langues : Anglais (eng) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : In a randomized controlled trial, the Observational Randomized Controlled Trial of Childhood Differential Susceptibility (ORCHIDS study), we tested whether observed parental affect and observed and reported parenting behavior are mechanisms of change underlying the effects of the behavioral parent training program the Incredible Years (IY). Furthermore, we tested whether some children are more susceptible to these change mechanisms because of their temperamental negative affectivity and/or serotonin transporter linked polymorphic region (5-HTTLPR) genotype. Participants were 387 Dutch children between 4 and 8 years of age (M age = 6.31, SD = 1.33; 55.3% boys) and their parents. Results showed that although IY was successful in improving parenting behavior and increasing parental positive affect, these effects did not explain the significant decreases in child externalizing problems. We therefore found no evidence for changes in parenting behavior or parental affect being the putative mechanisms of IY effectiveness. Furthermore, intervention effects on child externalizing behavior were not moderated by child negative affectivity or 5-HTTLPR genotype. However, child 5-HTTLPR genotype did moderate intervention effects on negative parenting behavior. This suggests that in research on behavioral parent training programs, “what works for which parents” might also be an important question. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579417000499 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=335 [article] Does the Incredible Years reduce child externalizing problems through improved parenting? The role of child negative affectivity and serotonin transporter linked polymorphic region (5-HTTLPR) genotype [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Joyce WEELAND, Auteur ; Rabia R. CHHANGUR, Auteur ; Sara R. JAFFEE, Auteur ; Danielle VAN DER GIESSEN, Auteur ; Walter MATTHYS, Auteur ; Bram OROBIO DE CASTRO, Auteur ; Geertjan OVERBEEK, Auteur . - p.93-112. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Development and Psychopathology > 30-1 (February 2018) . - p.93-112 Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : In a randomized controlled trial, the Observational Randomized Controlled Trial of Childhood Differential Susceptibility (ORCHIDS study), we tested whether observed parental affect and observed and reported parenting behavior are mechanisms of change underlying the effects of the behavioral parent training program the Incredible Years (IY). Furthermore, we tested whether some children are more susceptible to these change mechanisms because of their temperamental negative affectivity and/or serotonin transporter linked polymorphic region (5-HTTLPR) genotype. Participants were 387 Dutch children between 4 and 8 years of age (M age = 6.31, SD = 1.33; 55.3% boys) and their parents. Results showed that although IY was successful in improving parenting behavior and increasing parental positive affect, these effects did not explain the significant decreases in child externalizing problems. We therefore found no evidence for changes in parenting behavior or parental affect being the putative mechanisms of IY effectiveness. Furthermore, intervention effects on child externalizing behavior were not moderated by child negative affectivity or 5-HTTLPR genotype. However, child 5-HTTLPR genotype did moderate intervention effects on negative parenting behavior. This suggests that in research on behavioral parent training programs, “what works for which parents” might also be an important question. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579417000499 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=335

What changes when? A reply to Beauchaine and Slep / Joyce WEELAND in Development and Psychopathology, 30-4 (October 2018)  

Public ISBD [article]  inDevelopment and Psychopathology > 30-4 (October 2018) . - p.1535-1540 Titre : What changes when? A reply to Beauchaine and Slep Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Joyce WEELAND, Auteur ; Rabia R. CHHANGUR, Auteur ; Sara R. JAFFEE, Auteur ; Danielle VAN DER GIESSEN, Auteur ; Walter MATTHYS, Auteur ; Bram OROBIO DE CASTRO, Auteur ; Geertjan OVERBEEK, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.1535-1540 Langues : Anglais (eng) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : In their commentary, Beauchaine and Slep () raise important issues regarding research on behavioral parenting training (BPT). In this reply we highlight key points of agreement and respond to issues that we feel require clarification. BPT has been repeatedly proven effective in decreasing disruptive child behavior (also in the work of our research team). Yet, there is much to learn about for whom and how BPT is effective. Specifically, assessing the how (i.e., mediation) comes with many challenges. One of these challenges is taking into account the timeline of change, and being able to infer causal mechanisms of change. We argue that cross-lagged panel models (which we, and many other scholars, used) are a valid and valuable method for testing mediation. At the same time, our results raise important questions, specifically about the timing and form of expected changes in parenting and child behavior after BPT. For example, are these changes linear and gradual or do they happen more suddenly? To select the appropriate design, assessment tools, and statistical models to test mediation, we need to state detailed hypotheses on what changes when. An important next step might be to assess multiple putative mediators on different timescales, not only before and after, but specifically also during BPT. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579418000755 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=368 [article] What changes when? A reply to Beauchaine and Slep [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Joyce WEELAND, Auteur ; Rabia R. CHHANGUR, Auteur ; Sara R. JAFFEE, Auteur ; Danielle VAN DER GIESSEN, Auteur ; Walter MATTHYS, Auteur ; Bram OROBIO DE CASTRO, Auteur ; Geertjan OVERBEEK, Auteur . - p.1535-1540. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Development and Psychopathology > 30-4 (October 2018) . - p.1535-1540 Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : In their commentary, Beauchaine and Slep () raise important issues regarding research on behavioral parenting training (BPT). In this reply we highlight key points of agreement and respond to issues that we feel require clarification. BPT has been repeatedly proven effective in decreasing disruptive child behavior (also in the work of our research team). Yet, there is much to learn about for whom and how BPT is effective. Specifically, assessing the how (i.e., mediation) comes with many challenges. One of these challenges is taking into account the timeline of change, and being able to infer causal mechanisms of change. We argue that cross-lagged panel models (which we, and many other scholars, used) are a valid and valuable method for testing mediation. At the same time, our results raise important questions, specifically about the timing and form of expected changes in parenting and child behavior after BPT. For example, are these changes linear and gradual or do they happen more suddenly? To select the appropriate design, assessment tools, and statistical models to test mediation, we need to state detailed hypotheses on what changes when. An important next step might be to assess multiple putative mediators on different timescales, not only before and after, but specifically also during BPT. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579418000755 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=368

---

1 (1 - 2 / 2)