[article] 
inAutism > 27-2 (February 2023) . - p.275-295

Titre :	Non-pharmacological interventions for autistic children: An umbrella review
Type de document :	Texte imprimé et/ou numérique
Auteurs :	David TREMBATH, Auteur ; Kandice J. VARCIN, Auteur ; Hannah WADDINGTON, Auteur ; Rhylee SULEK, Auteur ; Cathy BENT, Auteur ; Jill ASHBURNER, Auteur ; Valsamma EAPEN, Auteur ; Emma GOODALL, Auteur ; Kristelle HUDRY, Auteur ; Jacqueline ROBERTS, Auteur ; Natalie SILOVE, Auteur ; Andrew J. O. WHITEHOUSE, Auteur
Article en page(s) :	p.275-295
Langues :	Anglais (eng)
Mots-clés :	autism  evidence  intervention  non-pharmacological  review
Index. décimale :	PER Périodiques
Résumé :	The breadth of available non-pharmacological interventions for autistic children, with varying evidence for efficacy summarised in multiple systematic reviews, creates challenges for parents, practitioners, and policymakers in navigating the research evidence. In this article, we report the findings of an umbrella review of 58 systematic reviews of non-pharmacological interventions for autistic children (aged 0 “12 years). Positive therapeutic effects were identified for Behavioural interventions, Developmental interventions, Naturalistic Developmental Behavioural Interventions, Technology-based interventions, and Cognitive Behaviour Therapy across several child and family outcomes. Positive effects for certain practices within Sensory-based interventions and ˜other’ interventions were limited to select child and family outcomes. Both inconsistent and null intervention effects were found for Treatment and Education of Autistic and related Communication-handicapped Children, and Animal-assisted interventions across outcomes. The possible influence of child (chronological age, core autism characteristics, and related skills) and delivery (agent, mode, format, and amount) characteristics on intervention effects was rarely examined, and inconsistent where reported. Twenty-seven systematic reviews (47%) were rated as ˜high’ quality. Few systematic reviews examined children’s participation and quality of life or adverse effects. The findings highlight the need for individualised evidence-based decision-making when selecting interventions for autistic children.
En ligne :	http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/13623613221119368
Permalink :	https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=493

[article] Non-pharmacological interventions for autistic children: An umbrella review [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / David TREMBATH, Auteur ; Kandice J. VARCIN, Auteur ; Hannah WADDINGTON, Auteur ; Rhylee SULEK, Auteur ; Cathy BENT, Auteur ; Jill ASHBURNER, Auteur ; Valsamma EAPEN, Auteur ; Emma GOODALL, Auteur ; Kristelle HUDRY, Auteur ; Jacqueline ROBERTS, Auteur ; Natalie SILOVE, Auteur ; Andrew J. O. WHITEHOUSE, Auteur . - p.275-295.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Autism > 27-2 (February 2023) . - p.275-295

Mots-clés :	autism  evidence  intervention  non-pharmacological  review
Index. décimale :	PER Périodiques
Résumé :	The breadth of available non-pharmacological interventions for autistic children, with varying evidence for efficacy summarised in multiple systematic reviews, creates challenges for parents, practitioners, and policymakers in navigating the research evidence. In this article, we report the findings of an umbrella review of 58 systematic reviews of non-pharmacological interventions for autistic children (aged 0 “12 years). Positive therapeutic effects were identified for Behavioural interventions, Developmental interventions, Naturalistic Developmental Behavioural Interventions, Technology-based interventions, and Cognitive Behaviour Therapy across several child and family outcomes. Positive effects for certain practices within Sensory-based interventions and ˜other’ interventions were limited to select child and family outcomes. Both inconsistent and null intervention effects were found for Treatment and Education of Autistic and related Communication-handicapped Children, and Animal-assisted interventions across outcomes. The possible influence of child (chronological age, core autism characteristics, and related skills) and delivery (agent, mode, format, and amount) characteristics on intervention effects was rarely examined, and inconsistent where reported. Twenty-seven systematic reviews (47%) were rated as ˜high’ quality. Few systematic reviews examined children’s participation and quality of life or adverse effects. The findings highlight the need for individualised evidence-based decision-making when selecting interventions for autistic children.
En ligne :	http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/13623613221119368
Permalink :	https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=493