Identifying the 'active ingredients' of socioeconomic disadvantage for youth outcomes in middle childhood / Elizabeth A. SHEWARK ; Megan E. MIKHAIL ; Daniel J. THALER ; Amber L. PEARSON ; Kelly L. KLUMP ; S. Alexandra BURT in Development and Psychopathology, 36-2 (May 2024)  

Public ISBD [article]  inDevelopment and Psychopathology > 36-2 (May 2024) . - p.857-865 Titre : Identifying the 'active ingredients' of socioeconomic disadvantage for youth outcomes in middle childhood Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Elizabeth A. SHEWARK, Auteur ; Megan E. MIKHAIL, Auteur ; Daniel J. THALER, Auteur ; Amber L. PEARSON, Auteur ; Kelly L. KLUMP, Auteur ; S. Alexandra BURT, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.857-865 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : academic achievement  ecological model  neighborhood context  socioeconomic disadvantage  youth psychopathology Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background:Youth experiencing socioeconomic deprivation may be exposed to disadvantage in multiple contexts (e.g., neighborhood, family, and school). To date, however, we know little about the underlying structure of socioeconomic disadvantage, including whether the 'active ingredients' driving its robust effects are specific to one context (e.g., neighborhood) or whether the various contexts increment one another as predictors of youth outcomes.Methods:The present study addressed this gap by examining the underlying structure of socioeconomic disadvantage across neighborhoods, families, and schools, as well as whether the various forms of disadvantage jointly predicted youth psychopathology and cognitive performance. Participants were 1,030 school-aged twin pairs from a subsample of the Michigan State University Twin Registry enriched for neighborhood disadvantage.Results:Two correlated factors underlay the indicators of disadvantage. Proximal disadvantage comprised familial indicators, whereas contextual disadvantage represented deprivation in the broader school and neighborhood contexts. Results from exhaustive modeling analyses indicated that proximal and contextual disadvantage incremented one another as predictors of childhood externalizing problems, disordered eating, and reading difficulties, but not internalizing symptoms.Conclusions:Disadvantage within the family and disadvantage in the broader context, respectively, appear to represent distinct constructs with additive influence, carrying unique implications for multiple behavioral outcomes during middle childhood. En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579423000135 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=528 [article] Identifying the 'active ingredients' of socioeconomic disadvantage for youth outcomes in middle childhood [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Elizabeth A. SHEWARK, Auteur ; Megan E. MIKHAIL, Auteur ; Daniel J. THALER, Auteur ; Amber L. PEARSON, Auteur ; Kelly L. KLUMP, Auteur ; S. Alexandra BURT, Auteur . - p.857-865. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Development and Psychopathology > 36-2 (May 2024) . - p.857-865 Mots-clés : academic achievement  ecological model  neighborhood context  socioeconomic disadvantage  youth psychopathology Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background:Youth experiencing socioeconomic deprivation may be exposed to disadvantage in multiple contexts (e.g., neighborhood, family, and school). To date, however, we know little about the underlying structure of socioeconomic disadvantage, including whether the 'active ingredients' driving its robust effects are specific to one context (e.g., neighborhood) or whether the various contexts increment one another as predictors of youth outcomes.Methods:The present study addressed this gap by examining the underlying structure of socioeconomic disadvantage across neighborhoods, families, and schools, as well as whether the various forms of disadvantage jointly predicted youth psychopathology and cognitive performance. Participants were 1,030 school-aged twin pairs from a subsample of the Michigan State University Twin Registry enriched for neighborhood disadvantage.Results:Two correlated factors underlay the indicators of disadvantage. Proximal disadvantage comprised familial indicators, whereas contextual disadvantage represented deprivation in the broader school and neighborhood contexts. Results from exhaustive modeling analyses indicated that proximal and contextual disadvantage incremented one another as predictors of childhood externalizing problems, disordered eating, and reading difficulties, but not internalizing symptoms.Conclusions:Disadvantage within the family and disadvantage in the broader context, respectively, appear to represent distinct constructs with additive influence, carrying unique implications for multiple behavioral outcomes during middle childhood. En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579423000135 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=528

It really does take a village: The role of neighbors in the etiology of nonaggressive rule-breaking behavior / S. Alexandra BURT in Development and Psychopathology, 31-2 (May 2019)  

Public ISBD [article]  inDevelopment and Psychopathology > 31-2 (May 2019) . - p.713-725 Titre : It really does take a village: The role of neighbors in the etiology of nonaggressive rule-breaking behavior Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : S. Alexandra BURT, Auteur ; Amber L. PEARSON, Auteur ; Amanda RZOTKIEWICZ, Auteur ; Kelly L. KLUMP, Auteur ; Jenae M. NEIDERHISER, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.713-725 Langues : Anglais (eng) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Although there is growing recognition that disadvantaged contexts attenuate genetic influences on youth misbehavior, it is not yet clear how this dampening occurs. The current study made use of a “geographic contagion” model to isolate specific contexts contributing to this effect, with a focus on nonaggressive rule-breaking behaviors (RB) in the families’ neighbors. Our sample included 847 families residing in or near modestly-to-severely disadvantaged neighborhoods who participated in the Michigan State University Twin Registry. Neighborhood sampling techniques were used to recruit neighbors residing within 5km of a given family (the mean number of neighbors assessed per family was 13.09; range, 1–47). Analyses revealed clear evidence of genotype–environment interactions by neighbor RB, such that sibling-level shared environmental influences on child RB increased with increasing neighbor self-reports of their own RB, whereas genetic influences decreased. Moreover, this moderation appeared to be driven by geographic proximity to neighbors. Sensitivity analyses further indicated that this effect was specifically accounted for by higher levels of neighbor joblessness, rather than elements of neighbor RB that would contribute to neighborhood blight or crime. Such findings provocatively suggest that future genotype–environment interactions studies should integrate the dynamic networks of social contagion theory. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579418000366 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=393 [article] It really does take a village: The role of neighbors in the etiology of nonaggressive rule-breaking behavior [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / S. Alexandra BURT, Auteur ; Amber L. PEARSON, Auteur ; Amanda RZOTKIEWICZ, Auteur ; Kelly L. KLUMP, Auteur ; Jenae M. NEIDERHISER, Auteur . - p.713-725. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Development and Psychopathology > 31-2 (May 2019) . - p.713-725 Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Although there is growing recognition that disadvantaged contexts attenuate genetic influences on youth misbehavior, it is not yet clear how this dampening occurs. The current study made use of a “geographic contagion” model to isolate specific contexts contributing to this effect, with a focus on nonaggressive rule-breaking behaviors (RB) in the families’ neighbors. Our sample included 847 families residing in or near modestly-to-severely disadvantaged neighborhoods who participated in the Michigan State University Twin Registry. Neighborhood sampling techniques were used to recruit neighbors residing within 5km of a given family (the mean number of neighbors assessed per family was 13.09; range, 1–47). Analyses revealed clear evidence of genotype–environment interactions by neighbor RB, such that sibling-level shared environmental influences on child RB increased with increasing neighbor self-reports of their own RB, whereas genetic influences decreased. Moreover, this moderation appeared to be driven by geographic proximity to neighbors. Sensitivity analyses further indicated that this effect was specifically accounted for by higher levels of neighbor joblessness, rather than elements of neighbor RB that would contribute to neighborhood blight or crime. Such findings provocatively suggest that future genotype–environment interactions studies should integrate the dynamic networks of social contagion theory. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579418000366 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=393

---

1 (1 - 2 / 2)