
- <Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
- CRA
- Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
Horaires
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexLundi au Vendredi
Contact
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Adresse
Auteur Katrina J. PHILLIPS
|
|
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (4)
Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
Titre : Challenging Behaviors Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Oliver C. MUDFORD, Auteur ; Sarah Ann TAYLOR, Auteur ; I-Chen Sharon HO, Auteur ; Janine MAARI LOCKE, Auteur ; Katrina J. PHILLIPS, Auteur ; Angela M. ARNOLD-SARITEPE, Auteur Année de publication : 2008 Importance : p.267-297 Langues : Anglais (eng) Index. décimale : AUT-E AUT-E - L'Autisme - Accompagnement et Qualité de Vie Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=449 Challenging Behaviors [texte imprimé] / Oliver C. MUDFORD, Auteur ; Sarah Ann TAYLOR, Auteur ; I-Chen Sharon HO, Auteur ; Janine MAARI LOCKE, Auteur ; Katrina J. PHILLIPS, Auteur ; Angela M. ARNOLD-SARITEPE, Auteur . - 2008 . - p.267-297.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
Index. décimale : AUT-E AUT-E - L'Autisme - Accompagnement et Qualité de Vie Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=449 Exemplaires(0)
Disponibilité aucun exemplaire Comparisons of interventions for rumination maintained by automatic reinforcement / Rebecca A. SHARP in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 6-3 (July-September 2012)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Comparisons of interventions for rumination maintained by automatic reinforcement Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Rebecca A. SHARP, Auteur ; Katrina J. PHILLIPS, Auteur ; Oliver C. MUDFORD, Auteur Année de publication : 2012 Article en page(s) : p.1107-1112 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Rumination Liquid rescheduling Autism Within-session analysis Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The effectiveness of four antecedent treatments for rumination was compared for two individuals with autism, severe intellectual disabilities and long histories (at least 20 years) of rumination. Comparisons of increased meal size, supplemental feedings, fixed-time provision of peanut butter, and liquid rescheduling found liquid rescheduling to be the most effective intervention for both clients. However, within-session analyses, both during intervention and for 30 min after the meal, showed individualized schedules of fluid provision were needed to increase the effectiveness of the treatment. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2012.03.002 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=154
in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders > 6-3 (July-September 2012) . - p.1107-1112[article] Comparisons of interventions for rumination maintained by automatic reinforcement [texte imprimé] / Rebecca A. SHARP, Auteur ; Katrina J. PHILLIPS, Auteur ; Oliver C. MUDFORD, Auteur . - 2012 . - p.1107-1112.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders > 6-3 (July-September 2012) . - p.1107-1112
Mots-clés : Rumination Liquid rescheduling Autism Within-session analysis Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The effectiveness of four antecedent treatments for rumination was compared for two individuals with autism, severe intellectual disabilities and long histories (at least 20 years) of rumination. Comparisons of increased meal size, supplemental feedings, fixed-time provision of peanut butter, and liquid rescheduling found liquid rescheduling to be the most effective intervention for both clients. However, within-session analyses, both during intervention and for 30 min after the meal, showed individualized schedules of fluid provision were needed to increase the effectiveness of the treatment. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2012.03.002 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=154 Exemplaires(0)
Disponibilité aucun exemplaire Gross Motor Development in Children With Autism: Longitudinal Trajectories From the Growing Up in New Zealand Study / Paula ARAYA ; Katrina J. PHILLIPS ; Karen WALDIE ; Lisa UNDERWOOD in Autism Research, 18-2 (February 2025)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Gross Motor Development in Children With Autism: Longitudinal Trajectories From the Growing Up in New Zealand Study : Autism Research Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Paula ARAYA, Auteur ; Katrina J. PHILLIPS, Auteur ; Karen WALDIE, Auteur ; Lisa UNDERWOOD, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.437-448 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : autism cohort gross motor development longitudinal research milestones Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : ABSTRACT This study explored gross motor development (GMD) trajectories among 6359 children, with and without autism, from the Growing Up in New Zealand longitudinal cohort study. By the age of 8, 173 children had either an autism diagnosis (n 108) or parent-reported autism concerns (n 65). Gross motor milestones were reported by mothers when children were 9, 24, and 54 months of age. We found that irrespective of autism diagnosis, GMD delays at 24 months of age were more likely among girls, children born preterm, and those whose mothers identified as European. A mixed-effect logistic regression model, controlling for antenatal maternal and child covariates, revealed that the proportion of children with GMD delay (relative to their peers) increased significantly from 9 to 54 months for all three groups, but the increase was greater for those with autism concerns (OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.08 1.52) or an autism diagnosis (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.10 1.43) compared to the no autism group (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.02 1.10). Differences in the changes in GMD performance among children with an autism diagnosis compared to those without autism occurred between 9 and 24 months (OR 2.16, 95% CI 1.13 4.13). No significant GMD delay differences were found at any time between children with an autism diagnosis versus those with autism concerns. Children with a GMD delay should be screened for autism at 24 m. Early identification is the first step toward knowledge-based, effective intervention of developmental difficulties. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.3304 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=547
in Autism Research > 18-2 (February 2025) . - p.437-448[article] Gross Motor Development in Children With Autism: Longitudinal Trajectories From the Growing Up in New Zealand Study : Autism Research [texte imprimé] / Paula ARAYA, Auteur ; Katrina J. PHILLIPS, Auteur ; Karen WALDIE, Auteur ; Lisa UNDERWOOD, Auteur . - p.437-448.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Autism Research > 18-2 (February 2025) . - p.437-448
Mots-clés : autism cohort gross motor development longitudinal research milestones Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : ABSTRACT This study explored gross motor development (GMD) trajectories among 6359 children, with and without autism, from the Growing Up in New Zealand longitudinal cohort study. By the age of 8, 173 children had either an autism diagnosis (n 108) or parent-reported autism concerns (n 65). Gross motor milestones were reported by mothers when children were 9, 24, and 54 months of age. We found that irrespective of autism diagnosis, GMD delays at 24 months of age were more likely among girls, children born preterm, and those whose mothers identified as European. A mixed-effect logistic regression model, controlling for antenatal maternal and child covariates, revealed that the proportion of children with GMD delay (relative to their peers) increased significantly from 9 to 54 months for all three groups, but the increase was greater for those with autism concerns (OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.08 1.52) or an autism diagnosis (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.10 1.43) compared to the no autism group (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.02 1.10). Differences in the changes in GMD performance among children with an autism diagnosis compared to those without autism occurred between 9 and 24 months (OR 2.16, 95% CI 1.13 4.13). No significant GMD delay differences were found at any time between children with an autism diagnosis versus those with autism concerns. Children with a GMD delay should be screened for autism at 24 m. Early identification is the first step toward knowledge-based, effective intervention of developmental difficulties. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.3304 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=547

