[article]
| Titre : |
The Brief Child and Family Phone Interview (BCFPI): 2. Usefulness in screening for child and adolescent psychopathology |
| Type de document : |
Texte imprimé et/ou numérique |
| Auteurs : |
Michael H. BOYLE, Auteur ; Katholiki GEORGIADES, Auteur ; Charles E. CUNNINGHAM, Auteur ; Peter PETTINGILL, Auteur ; John CULLEN, Auteur |
| Année de publication : |
2009 |
| Article en page(s) : |
p.424-431 |
| Langues : |
Anglais (eng) |
| Mots-clés : |
Assessment behaviour-problems interviewing screening reliability factor-analysis |
| Index. décimale : |
PER Périodiques |
| Résumé : |
Background: This study examines the use of the Brief Child and Family Phone Interview (BCFPI) to screen for childhood psychiatric disorder based on Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children Version IV (DISC-IV) classifications of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), oppositional defiant disorder (ODD), conduct disorder (CD), separation anxiety (SAD), generalized anxiety (GAD) and major depression (MDD).
Methods: Data for analysis come from a sample of 399 children and adolescents aged 5–17 years old referred to child mental health outpatient services in three Ontario cities. Mothers were administered the BCFPI on three occasions: baseline, 2 and 13 months; and the DISC-IV on two occasions: 1 and 12 months.
Results: Based on kappa, test–retest reliability for disorders classified by the BCFPI exceeded .50 for all conditions except MDD (.45). In receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, area-under-the-curve (AUC) estimates for BCFPI scale score associations with DISC-IV classifications of disorder exceeded .80 for CD, ODD, ADHD and SAD; and were lower for GAD (.76) and MDD (.75). In stratified analyses, there were no statistically significant differences in AUC estimates for boys versus girls and 5 to 11 versus 12 to 17-year-olds.
Conclusions: Classifications of childhood disorder derived from the BCFPI provided a reasonable approximation to disorders classified by the DISC-IV administered by lay interviewers. |
| En ligne : |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.01971.x |
| Permalink : |
https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=723 |
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 50-4 (April 2009) . - p.424-431
[article] The Brief Child and Family Phone Interview (BCFPI): 2. Usefulness in screening for child and adolescent psychopathology [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Michael H. BOYLE, Auteur ; Katholiki GEORGIADES, Auteur ; Charles E. CUNNINGHAM, Auteur ; Peter PETTINGILL, Auteur ; John CULLEN, Auteur . - 2009 . - p.424-431. Langues : Anglais ( eng) in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 50-4 (April 2009) . - p.424-431
| Mots-clés : |
Assessment behaviour-problems interviewing screening reliability factor-analysis |
| Index. décimale : |
PER Périodiques |
| Résumé : |
Background: This study examines the use of the Brief Child and Family Phone Interview (BCFPI) to screen for childhood psychiatric disorder based on Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children Version IV (DISC-IV) classifications of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), oppositional defiant disorder (ODD), conduct disorder (CD), separation anxiety (SAD), generalized anxiety (GAD) and major depression (MDD).
Methods: Data for analysis come from a sample of 399 children and adolescents aged 5–17 years old referred to child mental health outpatient services in three Ontario cities. Mothers were administered the BCFPI on three occasions: baseline, 2 and 13 months; and the DISC-IV on two occasions: 1 and 12 months.
Results: Based on kappa, test–retest reliability for disorders classified by the BCFPI exceeded .50 for all conditions except MDD (.45). In receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, area-under-the-curve (AUC) estimates for BCFPI scale score associations with DISC-IV classifications of disorder exceeded .80 for CD, ODD, ADHD and SAD; and were lower for GAD (.76) and MDD (.75). In stratified analyses, there were no statistically significant differences in AUC estimates for boys versus girls and 5 to 11 versus 12 to 17-year-olds.
Conclusions: Classifications of childhood disorder derived from the BCFPI provided a reasonable approximation to disorders classified by the DISC-IV administered by lay interviewers. |
| En ligne : |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.01971.x |
| Permalink : |
https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=723 |
|
The Brief Child and Family Phone Interview (BCFPI): 2. Usefulness in screening for child and adolescent psychopathology in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 50-4 (April 2009)
