No differences between group versus individual treatment of childhood anxiety disorders in a randomised clinical trial / Juliette M. LIBER in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49-8 (August 2008)  

Public ISBD [article]  inJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 49-8 (August 2008) . - p.886 - 893 Titre : No differences between group versus individual treatment of childhood anxiety disorders in a randomised clinical trial Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Juliette M. LIBER, Auteur ; Robert F. FERDINAND, Auteur ; Philip D.A. TREFFERS, Auteur ; Brigit M. VAN WIDENFELT, Auteur ; Elisabeth M.W.J. UTENS, Auteur ; Adelinde J.M. VAN DER LEEDEN, Auteur ; Willemijn VAN GASTEL, Auteur Année de publication : 2008 Article en page(s) : p.886 - 893 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Childhood-anxiety-disorders cognitive-behaviour-therapy randomised-clinical-trial internalising-disorder intervention Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background: The present study compares an individual versus a group format in the delivery of manualised cognitive-behavioural therapy (FRIENDS) for children with anxiety disorders. Clinically referred children (aged 8 to 12) diagnosed with Separation Anxiety Disorder (n = 52), Generalised Anxiety Disorder (n = 37), Social Phobia (n = 22) or Specific Phobia (n = 16) were randomly assigned to individual (n = 65) or group (n = 62) treatment. Method: Analyses were conducted separately for the intent-to-treat sample and the sample of children who completed treatment. Analyses included chi-square comparisons and regression analyses with treatment format as a predictor. Results: Forty-eight percent of the children in the individual versus 41% in the group treatment were free of any anxiety disorder at post-treatment; 62% versus 54% were free of their primary anxiety disorder. Regression analyses showed no significant difference in outcome between individual and group treatment. Conclusions: Children improved in both conditions. Choice between treatments could be based on pragmatic considerations such as therapeutic resources, referral rates, and the preference of the parents and the child. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.01877.x Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=542 [article] No differences between group versus individual treatment of childhood anxiety disorders in a randomised clinical trial [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Juliette M. LIBER, Auteur ; Robert F. FERDINAND, Auteur ; Philip D.A. TREFFERS, Auteur ; Brigit M. VAN WIDENFELT, Auteur ; Elisabeth M.W.J. UTENS, Auteur ; Adelinde J.M. VAN DER LEEDEN, Auteur ; Willemijn VAN GASTEL, Auteur . - 2008 . - p.886 - 893. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 49-8 (August 2008) . - p.886 - 893 Mots-clés : Childhood-anxiety-disorders cognitive-behaviour-therapy randomised-clinical-trial internalising-disorder intervention Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background: The present study compares an individual versus a group format in the delivery of manualised cognitive-behavioural therapy (FRIENDS) for children with anxiety disorders. Clinically referred children (aged 8 to 12) diagnosed with Separation Anxiety Disorder (n = 52), Generalised Anxiety Disorder (n = 37), Social Phobia (n = 22) or Specific Phobia (n = 16) were randomly assigned to individual (n = 65) or group (n = 62) treatment. Method: Analyses were conducted separately for the intent-to-treat sample and the sample of children who completed treatment. Analyses included chi-square comparisons and regression analyses with treatment format as a predictor. Results: Forty-eight percent of the children in the individual versus 41% in the group treatment were free of any anxiety disorder at post-treatment; 62% versus 54% were free of their primary anxiety disorder. Regression analyses showed no significant difference in outcome between individual and group treatment. Conclusions: Children improved in both conditions. Choice between treatments could be based on pragmatic considerations such as therapeutic resources, referral rates, and the preference of the parents and the child. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.01877.x Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=542

Parenting and Parental Anxiety and Depression as Predictors of Treatment Outcome for Childhood Anxiety Disorders: Has the Role of Fathers Been Underestimated? / Juliette M. LIBER in Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 37-4 (October-December 2008)  

Public ISBD [article]  inJournal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology > 37-4 (October-December 2008) . - p.747-758 Titre : Parenting and Parental Anxiety and Depression as Predictors of Treatment Outcome for Childhood Anxiety Disorders: Has the Role of Fathers Been Underestimated? Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Juliette M. LIBER, Auteur ; Arnold W. GOEDHART, Auteur ; Philip D.A. TREFFERS, Auteur ; Brigit M. VAN WIDENFELT, Auteur ; Elisabeth M.W.J. UTENS, Auteur ; Adelinde J.M. VAN DER LEEDEN, Auteur ; Monica T. MARKUS, Auteur Année de publication : 2008 Article en page(s) : p.747-758 Langues : Anglais (eng) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Abstract A substantial percentage of children with anxiety disorders do not respond adequately to Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT). Examination of parental factors related to treatment outcome could contribute to a further understanding of treatment outcome responses. This study investigated the predictive value of paternal and maternal emotional warmth, rejection, overprotection, anxiety, and depression for CBT outcome in clinic-referred anxious children (ages 8-12). Levels of maternal emotional warmth, paternal rejection and anxiety, and depressive symptoms predicted treatment success and failure. A higher level of maternal emotional warmth was associated with a less favorable treatment outcome. Higher levels of paternal rejection, anxiety, and depressive symptoms were consistently associated with a less favorable treatment outcome. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15374410802359692 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=645 [article] Parenting and Parental Anxiety and Depression as Predictors of Treatment Outcome for Childhood Anxiety Disorders: Has the Role of Fathers Been Underestimated? [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Juliette M. LIBER, Auteur ; Arnold W. GOEDHART, Auteur ; Philip D.A. TREFFERS, Auteur ; Brigit M. VAN WIDENFELT, Auteur ; Elisabeth M.W.J. UTENS, Auteur ; Adelinde J.M. VAN DER LEEDEN, Auteur ; Monica T. MARKUS, Auteur . - 2008 . - p.747-758. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology > 37-4 (October-December 2008) . - p.747-758 Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Abstract A substantial percentage of children with anxiety disorders do not respond adequately to Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT). Examination of parental factors related to treatment outcome could contribute to a further understanding of treatment outcome responses. This study investigated the predictive value of paternal and maternal emotional warmth, rejection, overprotection, anxiety, and depression for CBT outcome in clinic-referred anxious children (ages 8-12). Levels of maternal emotional warmth, paternal rejection and anxiety, and depressive symptoms predicted treatment success and failure. A higher level of maternal emotional warmth was associated with a less favorable treatment outcome. Higher levels of paternal rejection, anxiety, and depressive symptoms were consistently associated with a less favorable treatment outcome. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15374410802359692 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=645

---

1 (1 - 2 / 2)