Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Willemijn VAN GASTEL |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (1)
Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
No differences between group versus individual treatment of childhood anxiety disorders in a randomised clinical trial / Juliette M. LIBER in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49-8 (August 2008)
[article]
Titre : No differences between group versus individual treatment of childhood anxiety disorders in a randomised clinical trial Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Juliette M. LIBER, Auteur ; Robert F. FERDINAND, Auteur ; Philip D.A. TREFFERS, Auteur ; Brigit M. VAN WIDENFELT, Auteur ; Elisabeth M.W.J. UTENS, Auteur ; Adelinde J.M. VAN DER LEEDEN, Auteur ; Willemijn VAN GASTEL, Auteur Année de publication : 2008 Article en page(s) : p.886 - 893 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Childhood-anxiety-disorders cognitive-behaviour-therapy randomised-clinical-trial internalising-disorder intervention Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background: The present study compares an individual versus a group format in the delivery of manualised cognitive-behavioural therapy (FRIENDS) for children with anxiety disorders. Clinically referred children (aged 8 to 12) diagnosed with Separation Anxiety Disorder (n = 52), Generalised Anxiety Disorder (n = 37), Social Phobia (n = 22) or Specific Phobia (n = 16) were randomly assigned to individual (n = 65) or group (n = 62) treatment.
Method: Analyses were conducted separately for the intent-to-treat sample and the sample of children who completed treatment. Analyses included chi-square comparisons and regression analyses with treatment format as a predictor.
Results: Forty-eight percent of the children in the individual versus 41% in the group treatment were free of any anxiety disorder at post-treatment; 62% versus 54% were free of their primary anxiety disorder. Regression analyses showed no significant difference in outcome between individual and group treatment.
Conclusions: Children improved in both conditions. Choice between treatments could be based on pragmatic considerations such as therapeutic resources, referral rates, and the preference of the parents and the child.En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.01877.x Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=542
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 49-8 (August 2008) . - p.886 - 893[article] No differences between group versus individual treatment of childhood anxiety disorders in a randomised clinical trial [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Juliette M. LIBER, Auteur ; Robert F. FERDINAND, Auteur ; Philip D.A. TREFFERS, Auteur ; Brigit M. VAN WIDENFELT, Auteur ; Elisabeth M.W.J. UTENS, Auteur ; Adelinde J.M. VAN DER LEEDEN, Auteur ; Willemijn VAN GASTEL, Auteur . - 2008 . - p.886 - 893.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 49-8 (August 2008) . - p.886 - 893
Mots-clés : Childhood-anxiety-disorders cognitive-behaviour-therapy randomised-clinical-trial internalising-disorder intervention Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background: The present study compares an individual versus a group format in the delivery of manualised cognitive-behavioural therapy (FRIENDS) for children with anxiety disorders. Clinically referred children (aged 8 to 12) diagnosed with Separation Anxiety Disorder (n = 52), Generalised Anxiety Disorder (n = 37), Social Phobia (n = 22) or Specific Phobia (n = 16) were randomly assigned to individual (n = 65) or group (n = 62) treatment.
Method: Analyses were conducted separately for the intent-to-treat sample and the sample of children who completed treatment. Analyses included chi-square comparisons and regression analyses with treatment format as a predictor.
Results: Forty-eight percent of the children in the individual versus 41% in the group treatment were free of any anxiety disorder at post-treatment; 62% versus 54% were free of their primary anxiety disorder. Regression analyses showed no significant difference in outcome between individual and group treatment.
Conclusions: Children improved in both conditions. Choice between treatments could be based on pragmatic considerations such as therapeutic resources, referral rates, and the preference of the parents and the child.En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.01877.x Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=542