
- <Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
- CRA
- Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
Horaires
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexLundi au Vendredi
Contact
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Adresse
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Elisabeth M.W.J. UTENS |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (3)



CBT for childhood anxiety disorders: differential changes in selective attention between treatment responders and non-responders / Jeroen S. LEGERSTEE in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 51-2 (February 2010)
![]()
[article]
Titre : CBT for childhood anxiety disorders: differential changes in selective attention between treatment responders and non-responders Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Jeroen S. LEGERSTEE, Auteur ; Frank C. VERHULST, Auteur ; Philip D.A. TREFFERS, Auteur ; Elisabeth M.W.J. UTENS, Auteur ; Joke H.M. TULEN, Auteur ; Bram DIERCKX, Auteur Année de publication : 2010 Article en page(s) : p.162-172 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Childhood-anxiety-disorders selective-attention cognitive-behavioural-therapy dot-probe-task Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background: This study examined whether treatment response to stepped-care cognitive-behavioural treatment (CBT) is associated with changes in threat-related selective attention and its specific components in a large clinical sample of anxiety-disordered children.
Methods: Ninety-one children with an anxiety disorder were included in the present study. Children received a standardized stepped-care CBT. Three treatment response groups were distinguished: initial responders (anxiety disorder free after phase one: child-focused CBT), secondary responders (anxiety disorder free after phase two: child–parent-focused CBT), and treatment non-responders. Treatment response was determined using a semi-structured clinical interview. Children performed a pictorial dot-probe task before and after stepped-care CBT (i.e., before phase one and after phase two CBT).
Results: Changes in selective attention to severely threatening pictures, but not to mildly threatening pictures, were significantly associated with treatment success. At pre-treatment assessment, initial responders selectively attended away from severely threatening pictures, whereas secondary responders selectively attended toward severely threatening pictures. After stepped-care CBT, initial and secondary responders did not show any selectivity in the attentional processing of severely threatening pictures. Treatment non-responders did not show any changes in selective attention due to CBT.
Conclusions: Initial and secondary treatment responders showed a reduction of their predisposition to selectively attend away or toward severely threatening pictures, respectively. Treatment non-responders did not show any changes in selective attention. The pictorial dot-probe task can be considered a potentially valuable tool in assigning children to appropriate treatment formats as well as for monitoring changes in selective attention during the course of CBT.En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2009.02143.x Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=941
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 51-2 (February 2010) . - p.162-172[article] CBT for childhood anxiety disorders: differential changes in selective attention between treatment responders and non-responders [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Jeroen S. LEGERSTEE, Auteur ; Frank C. VERHULST, Auteur ; Philip D.A. TREFFERS, Auteur ; Elisabeth M.W.J. UTENS, Auteur ; Joke H.M. TULEN, Auteur ; Bram DIERCKX, Auteur . - 2010 . - p.162-172.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 51-2 (February 2010) . - p.162-172
Mots-clés : Childhood-anxiety-disorders selective-attention cognitive-behavioural-therapy dot-probe-task Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background: This study examined whether treatment response to stepped-care cognitive-behavioural treatment (CBT) is associated with changes in threat-related selective attention and its specific components in a large clinical sample of anxiety-disordered children.
Methods: Ninety-one children with an anxiety disorder were included in the present study. Children received a standardized stepped-care CBT. Three treatment response groups were distinguished: initial responders (anxiety disorder free after phase one: child-focused CBT), secondary responders (anxiety disorder free after phase two: child–parent-focused CBT), and treatment non-responders. Treatment response was determined using a semi-structured clinical interview. Children performed a pictorial dot-probe task before and after stepped-care CBT (i.e., before phase one and after phase two CBT).
Results: Changes in selective attention to severely threatening pictures, but not to mildly threatening pictures, were significantly associated with treatment success. At pre-treatment assessment, initial responders selectively attended away from severely threatening pictures, whereas secondary responders selectively attended toward severely threatening pictures. After stepped-care CBT, initial and secondary responders did not show any selectivity in the attentional processing of severely threatening pictures. Treatment non-responders did not show any changes in selective attention due to CBT.
Conclusions: Initial and secondary treatment responders showed a reduction of their predisposition to selectively attend away or toward severely threatening pictures, respectively. Treatment non-responders did not show any changes in selective attention. The pictorial dot-probe task can be considered a potentially valuable tool in assigning children to appropriate treatment formats as well as for monitoring changes in selective attention during the course of CBT.En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2009.02143.x Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=941 No differences between group versus individual treatment of childhood anxiety disorders in a randomised clinical trial / Juliette M. LIBER in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49-8 (August 2008)
![]()
[article]
Titre : No differences between group versus individual treatment of childhood anxiety disorders in a randomised clinical trial Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Juliette M. LIBER, Auteur ; Robert F. FERDINAND, Auteur ; Philip D.A. TREFFERS, Auteur ; Brigit M. VAN WIDENFELT, Auteur ; Elisabeth M.W.J. UTENS, Auteur ; Adelinde J.M. VAN DER LEEDEN, Auteur ; Willemijn VAN GASTEL, Auteur Année de publication : 2008 Article en page(s) : p.886 - 893 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Childhood-anxiety-disorders cognitive-behaviour-therapy randomised-clinical-trial internalising-disorder intervention Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background: The present study compares an individual versus a group format in the delivery of manualised cognitive-behavioural therapy (FRIENDS) for children with anxiety disorders. Clinically referred children (aged 8 to 12) diagnosed with Separation Anxiety Disorder (n = 52), Generalised Anxiety Disorder (n = 37), Social Phobia (n = 22) or Specific Phobia (n = 16) were randomly assigned to individual (n = 65) or group (n = 62) treatment.
Method: Analyses were conducted separately for the intent-to-treat sample and the sample of children who completed treatment. Analyses included chi-square comparisons and regression analyses with treatment format as a predictor.
Results: Forty-eight percent of the children in the individual versus 41% in the group treatment were free of any anxiety disorder at post-treatment; 62% versus 54% were free of their primary anxiety disorder. Regression analyses showed no significant difference in outcome between individual and group treatment.
Conclusions: Children improved in both conditions. Choice between treatments could be based on pragmatic considerations such as therapeutic resources, referral rates, and the preference of the parents and the child.En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.01877.x Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=542
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 49-8 (August 2008) . - p.886 - 893[article] No differences between group versus individual treatment of childhood anxiety disorders in a randomised clinical trial [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Juliette M. LIBER, Auteur ; Robert F. FERDINAND, Auteur ; Philip D.A. TREFFERS, Auteur ; Brigit M. VAN WIDENFELT, Auteur ; Elisabeth M.W.J. UTENS, Auteur ; Adelinde J.M. VAN DER LEEDEN, Auteur ; Willemijn VAN GASTEL, Auteur . - 2008 . - p.886 - 893.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 49-8 (August 2008) . - p.886 - 893
Mots-clés : Childhood-anxiety-disorders cognitive-behaviour-therapy randomised-clinical-trial internalising-disorder intervention Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background: The present study compares an individual versus a group format in the delivery of manualised cognitive-behavioural therapy (FRIENDS) for children with anxiety disorders. Clinically referred children (aged 8 to 12) diagnosed with Separation Anxiety Disorder (n = 52), Generalised Anxiety Disorder (n = 37), Social Phobia (n = 22) or Specific Phobia (n = 16) were randomly assigned to individual (n = 65) or group (n = 62) treatment.
Method: Analyses were conducted separately for the intent-to-treat sample and the sample of children who completed treatment. Analyses included chi-square comparisons and regression analyses with treatment format as a predictor.
Results: Forty-eight percent of the children in the individual versus 41% in the group treatment were free of any anxiety disorder at post-treatment; 62% versus 54% were free of their primary anxiety disorder. Regression analyses showed no significant difference in outcome between individual and group treatment.
Conclusions: Children improved in both conditions. Choice between treatments could be based on pragmatic considerations such as therapeutic resources, referral rates, and the preference of the parents and the child.En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.01877.x Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=542 Parenting and Parental Anxiety and Depression as Predictors of Treatment Outcome for Childhood Anxiety Disorders: Has the Role of Fathers Been Underestimated? / Juliette M. LIBER in Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 37-4 (October-December 2008)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Parenting and Parental Anxiety and Depression as Predictors of Treatment Outcome for Childhood Anxiety Disorders: Has the Role of Fathers Been Underestimated? Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Juliette M. LIBER, Auteur ; Arnold W. GOEDHART, Auteur ; Philip D.A. TREFFERS, Auteur ; Brigit M. VAN WIDENFELT, Auteur ; Elisabeth M.W.J. UTENS, Auteur ; Adelinde J.M. VAN DER LEEDEN, Auteur ; Monica T. MARKUS, Auteur Année de publication : 2008 Article en page(s) : p.747-758 Langues : Anglais (eng) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Abstract
A substantial percentage of children with anxiety disorders do not respond adequately to Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT). Examination of parental factors related to treatment outcome could contribute to a further understanding of treatment outcome responses. This study investigated the predictive value of paternal and maternal emotional warmth, rejection, overprotection, anxiety, and depression for CBT outcome in clinic-referred anxious children (ages 8-12). Levels of maternal emotional warmth, paternal rejection and anxiety, and depressive symptoms predicted treatment success and failure. A higher level of maternal emotional warmth was associated with a less favorable treatment outcome. Higher levels of paternal rejection, anxiety, and depressive symptoms were consistently associated with a less favorable treatment outcome.En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15374410802359692 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=645
in Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology > 37-4 (October-December 2008) . - p.747-758[article] Parenting and Parental Anxiety and Depression as Predictors of Treatment Outcome for Childhood Anxiety Disorders: Has the Role of Fathers Been Underestimated? [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Juliette M. LIBER, Auteur ; Arnold W. GOEDHART, Auteur ; Philip D.A. TREFFERS, Auteur ; Brigit M. VAN WIDENFELT, Auteur ; Elisabeth M.W.J. UTENS, Auteur ; Adelinde J.M. VAN DER LEEDEN, Auteur ; Monica T. MARKUS, Auteur . - 2008 . - p.747-758.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology > 37-4 (October-December 2008) . - p.747-758
Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Abstract
A substantial percentage of children with anxiety disorders do not respond adequately to Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT). Examination of parental factors related to treatment outcome could contribute to a further understanding of treatment outcome responses. This study investigated the predictive value of paternal and maternal emotional warmth, rejection, overprotection, anxiety, and depression for CBT outcome in clinic-referred anxious children (ages 8-12). Levels of maternal emotional warmth, paternal rejection and anxiety, and depressive symptoms predicted treatment success and failure. A higher level of maternal emotional warmth was associated with a less favorable treatment outcome. Higher levels of paternal rejection, anxiety, and depressive symptoms were consistently associated with a less favorable treatment outcome.En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15374410802359692 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=645