[article]
Titre : |
Sex differences in early autism screening using the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers, Revised, with Follow-Up (M-CHAT-R/F) |
Type de document : |
Texte imprimé et/ou numérique |
Auteurs : |
Sherief Y ELDEEB, Auteur ; Natasha N LUDWIG, Auteur ; Andrea Trubanova WIECKOWSKI, Auteur ; Mary FS DIECKHAUS, Auteur ; Yasemin Algur, Auteur ; Victoria RYAN, Auteur ; Sarah DUFEK, Auteur ; Aubyn STAHMER, Auteur ; Diana L ROBINS, Auteur |
Article en page(s) : |
p.2112-2123 |
Langues : |
Anglais (eng) |
Mots-clés : |
autism screening sex differences toddler |
Index. décimale : |
PER Périodiques |
Résumé : |
Males are more likely to be diagnosed with autism than females, and at earlier ages, yet few studies examine sex differences in screening. This study explored sex differences in psychometric properties, recommended cutoff scores, and overall scores of the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers, Revised, with Follow-Up. Participants were 28,088 toddlers enrolled in four early detection of autism studies. Children (N=731) at high likelihood for autism attended evaluations after screening and/or primary care clinician concern. Females were less likely to screen at high likelihood for autism at each stage of screening and therefore less likely to be invited for evaluations. Positive predictive value was significantly lower among females than males, but sensitivity was similar. False positive females were likely to have another developmental delay. Cutoff scores for males and females matched recommended guidelines. Final scores on the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers, Revised, with Follow-Up did not differ between males and females diagnosed with autism, but did for the overall sample identified at high likelihood for autism. Our findings suggest that females are less likely to be referred for evaluations, but the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers, Revised, with Follow-Up accurately identifies both males and females with autism at established cutoffs. Future research should examine methods to reduce false positive in females.Lay abstractThis study examined a widely used autism screening tool, the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers, Revised, with Follow-Up to identify differences in screening for autism between toddler males and females. Examining sex differences in screening for autism in toddlerhood is important as it determines who will be referred for evaluations and receive diagnoses, which is critical for access to autism-specific early intervention. This study found that females were less likely to screen positive and be invited for evaluations compared with males. Females at high likelihood for autism were less likely to be diagnosed with autism, which decreases confidence in the screener?s results. Importantly, the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers, Revised, with Follow-Up accurately identified both males and females with autism. Future research should examine ways to improve accuracy in screening results for females. |
En ligne : |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/13623613231154728 |
Permalink : |
https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=510 |
in Autism > 27-7 (October 2023) . - p.2112-2123
[article] Sex differences in early autism screening using the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers, Revised, with Follow-Up (M-CHAT-R/F) [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Sherief Y ELDEEB, Auteur ; Natasha N LUDWIG, Auteur ; Andrea Trubanova WIECKOWSKI, Auteur ; Mary FS DIECKHAUS, Auteur ; Yasemin Algur, Auteur ; Victoria RYAN, Auteur ; Sarah DUFEK, Auteur ; Aubyn STAHMER, Auteur ; Diana L ROBINS, Auteur . - p.2112-2123. Langues : Anglais ( eng) in Autism > 27-7 (October 2023) . - p.2112-2123
Mots-clés : |
autism screening sex differences toddler |
Index. décimale : |
PER Périodiques |
Résumé : |
Males are more likely to be diagnosed with autism than females, and at earlier ages, yet few studies examine sex differences in screening. This study explored sex differences in psychometric properties, recommended cutoff scores, and overall scores of the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers, Revised, with Follow-Up. Participants were 28,088 toddlers enrolled in four early detection of autism studies. Children (N=731) at high likelihood for autism attended evaluations after screening and/or primary care clinician concern. Females were less likely to screen at high likelihood for autism at each stage of screening and therefore less likely to be invited for evaluations. Positive predictive value was significantly lower among females than males, but sensitivity was similar. False positive females were likely to have another developmental delay. Cutoff scores for males and females matched recommended guidelines. Final scores on the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers, Revised, with Follow-Up did not differ between males and females diagnosed with autism, but did for the overall sample identified at high likelihood for autism. Our findings suggest that females are less likely to be referred for evaluations, but the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers, Revised, with Follow-Up accurately identifies both males and females with autism at established cutoffs. Future research should examine methods to reduce false positive in females.Lay abstractThis study examined a widely used autism screening tool, the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers, Revised, with Follow-Up to identify differences in screening for autism between toddler males and females. Examining sex differences in screening for autism in toddlerhood is important as it determines who will be referred for evaluations and receive diagnoses, which is critical for access to autism-specific early intervention. This study found that females were less likely to screen positive and be invited for evaluations compared with males. Females at high likelihood for autism were less likely to be diagnosed with autism, which decreases confidence in the screener?s results. Importantly, the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers, Revised, with Follow-Up accurately identified both males and females with autism. Future research should examine ways to improve accuracy in screening results for females. |
En ligne : |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/13623613231154728 |
Permalink : |
https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=510 |
|