Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Madison HOOPER |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (2)
Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
Paisley: Preliminary validation of a novel app-based e-Screener for ASD in children 18-36?months / Makayla G. HONAKER in Autism Research, 16-10 (October 2023)
[article]
Titre : Paisley: Preliminary validation of a novel app-based e-Screener for ASD in children 18-36?months Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Makayla G. HONAKER, Auteur ; Amy S. WEITLAUF, Auteur ; Amy R. SWANSON, Auteur ; Madison HOOPER, Auteur ; Nilanjan SARKAR, Auteur ; Joshua WADE, Auteur ; Zachary E. WARREN, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.1963-1975 Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Abstract The purpose of this study was to assess the validity of an autism e-screener, Paisley, when utilized in a clinical research setting via a tablet application. The Paisley application used a series of play-based activities, all of which incorporated varying aspects of the ASD-PEDS. Participants included children (18-36?months; n?=?198) referred for evaluation of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and community providers (n?=?66) with differing levels of familiarity with ASD. Community providers administered the Paisley application to children who then completed a comprehensive psychological evaluation. Based on comprehensive evaluation, 75% of children met diagnostic criteria for ASD. Paisley scores were significantly higher for children diagnosed with ASD (15.06) versus those not diagnosed (9.34). The newly determined cutoff ASD-PEDS cutoff score of 13 had significantly higher specificity and positive predictive value than the originally proposed cutoff of 11. Results support the use of Paisley by community providers to identify autism risk in toddlers. Limitations and strengths of the work, as well as opportunities for future clinical validation, are described. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.2997 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=513
in Autism Research > 16-10 (October 2023) . - p.1963-1975[article] Paisley: Preliminary validation of a novel app-based e-Screener for ASD in children 18-36?months [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Makayla G. HONAKER, Auteur ; Amy S. WEITLAUF, Auteur ; Amy R. SWANSON, Auteur ; Madison HOOPER, Auteur ; Nilanjan SARKAR, Auteur ; Joshua WADE, Auteur ; Zachary E. WARREN, Auteur . - p.1963-1975.
in Autism Research > 16-10 (October 2023) . - p.1963-1975
Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Abstract The purpose of this study was to assess the validity of an autism e-screener, Paisley, when utilized in a clinical research setting via a tablet application. The Paisley application used a series of play-based activities, all of which incorporated varying aspects of the ASD-PEDS. Participants included children (18-36?months; n?=?198) referred for evaluation of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and community providers (n?=?66) with differing levels of familiarity with ASD. Community providers administered the Paisley application to children who then completed a comprehensive psychological evaluation. Based on comprehensive evaluation, 75% of children met diagnostic criteria for ASD. Paisley scores were significantly higher for children diagnosed with ASD (15.06) versus those not diagnosed (9.34). The newly determined cutoff ASD-PEDS cutoff score of 13 had significantly higher specificity and positive predictive value than the originally proposed cutoff of 11. Results support the use of Paisley by community providers to identify autism risk in toddlers. Limitations and strengths of the work, as well as opportunities for future clinical validation, are described. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.2997 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=513 A Randomized Trial of the Accuracy of Novel Telehealth Instruments for the Assessment of Autism in Toddlers / Laura L. CORONA in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 54-6 (June 2024)
[article]
Titre : A Randomized Trial of the Accuracy of Novel Telehealth Instruments for the Assessment of Autism in Toddlers Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Laura L. CORONA, Auteur ; Liliana WAGNER, Auteur ; Madison HOOPER, Auteur ; Amy WEITLAUF, Auteur ; Tori E. FOSTER, Auteur ; Jeffrey HINE, Auteur ; Alexandra MICELI, Auteur ; Amy NICHOLSON, Auteur ; Caitlin STONE, Auteur ; Alison VEHORN, Auteur ; Zachary WARREN, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.2069-2080 Langues : Anglais (eng) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Purpose: Telemedicine approaches to autism (ASD) assessment have become increasingly common, yet few validated tools exist for this purpose. This study presents results from a clinical trial investigating two approaches to tele-assessment for ASD in toddlers. Methods: 144 children (29% female) between 17 and 36 months of age (mean = 2.5 years, SD = 0.33 years) completed tele-assessment using either the TELE-ASD-PEDS (TAP) or an experimental remote administration of the Screening Tool for Autism in Toddlers (STAT). All children then completed traditional in-person assessment with a blinded clinician, using the Mullen Scales of Early Learning (MSEL), Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, 3rd Edition (VABS-3), and Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS-2). Both tele-assessment and in-person assessment included a clinical interview with caregivers. Results: Results indicated diagnostic agreement for 92% of participants. Children diagnosed with ASD following in-person assessment who were missed by tele-assessment (n = 8) had lower scores on tele- and in-person ASD assessment tools. Children inaccurately identified as having ASD by tele-assessment (n = 3) were younger than other children and had higher developmental and adaptive behavior scores than children accurately diagnosed with ASD by tele-assessment. Diagnostic certainty was highest for children correctly identified as having ASD via tele-assessment. Clinicians and caregivers reported satisfaction with tele-assessment procedures. Conclusion: This work provides additional support for the use of tele-assessment for identification of ASD in toddlers, with both clinicians and families reporting broad acceptability. Continued development and refinement of tele-assessment procedures is recommended to optimize this approach for the needs of varying clinicians, families, and circumstances. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-023-05908-9 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=530
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 54-6 (June 2024) . - p.2069-2080[article] A Randomized Trial of the Accuracy of Novel Telehealth Instruments for the Assessment of Autism in Toddlers [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Laura L. CORONA, Auteur ; Liliana WAGNER, Auteur ; Madison HOOPER, Auteur ; Amy WEITLAUF, Auteur ; Tori E. FOSTER, Auteur ; Jeffrey HINE, Auteur ; Alexandra MICELI, Auteur ; Amy NICHOLSON, Auteur ; Caitlin STONE, Auteur ; Alison VEHORN, Auteur ; Zachary WARREN, Auteur . - p.2069-2080.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 54-6 (June 2024) . - p.2069-2080
Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Purpose: Telemedicine approaches to autism (ASD) assessment have become increasingly common, yet few validated tools exist for this purpose. This study presents results from a clinical trial investigating two approaches to tele-assessment for ASD in toddlers. Methods: 144 children (29% female) between 17 and 36 months of age (mean = 2.5 years, SD = 0.33 years) completed tele-assessment using either the TELE-ASD-PEDS (TAP) or an experimental remote administration of the Screening Tool for Autism in Toddlers (STAT). All children then completed traditional in-person assessment with a blinded clinician, using the Mullen Scales of Early Learning (MSEL), Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, 3rd Edition (VABS-3), and Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS-2). Both tele-assessment and in-person assessment included a clinical interview with caregivers. Results: Results indicated diagnostic agreement for 92% of participants. Children diagnosed with ASD following in-person assessment who were missed by tele-assessment (n = 8) had lower scores on tele- and in-person ASD assessment tools. Children inaccurately identified as having ASD by tele-assessment (n = 3) were younger than other children and had higher developmental and adaptive behavior scores than children accurately diagnosed with ASD by tele-assessment. Diagnostic certainty was highest for children correctly identified as having ASD via tele-assessment. Clinicians and caregivers reported satisfaction with tele-assessment procedures. Conclusion: This work provides additional support for the use of tele-assessment for identification of ASD in toddlers, with both clinicians and families reporting broad acceptability. Continued development and refinement of tele-assessment procedures is recommended to optimize this approach for the needs of varying clinicians, families, and circumstances. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-023-05908-9 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=530