Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur John HORACK |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (1)
Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
Measuring intelligence in Autism and ADHD: Measurement invariance of the-Binet 5th edition and impact of subtest scatter on abbreviated IQ accuracy / Ann LEVINE ; Nicholas C. C. RUSSELL ; John HORACK ; Eric M. BUTTER in Autism Research, 16-12 (December 2023)
[article]
Titre : Measuring intelligence in Autism and ADHD: Measurement invariance of the-Binet 5th edition and impact of subtest scatter on abbreviated IQ accuracy Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Ann LEVINE, Auteur ; Nicholas C. C. RUSSELL, Auteur ; John HORACK, Auteur ; Eric M. BUTTER, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.2350-2363 Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Abstract Scatter and heterogeneity in cognitive profiles is thought to be common in autism spectrum disorder (ASD), which may indicate differences in the construct of IQ. However, less research has investigated IQ scatter in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Scatter is also thought to negatively impact the predictive validity of IQ summary scores, although there is research refuting this notion. Abbreviated IQ tests, such as the Stanford-Binet fifth edition (SB-5) abbreviated battery IQ (ABIQ), may be especially susceptible to the influence of scatter. We tested the measurement invariance of the SB-5 as well as the predictive validity of the ABIQ in predicting FSIQ in 1679 youth (21% female) ages 2-16?years with a clinical diagnosis of ASD or ADHD. Results indicated the SB-5 is measuring IQ the same way in ASD and ADHD. There were no differences between diagnostic groups in scatter between ABIQ (i.e., routing) subtests. Additionally, scatter was not related to dimensional autistic traits. Higher degree of scatter was associated with poorer predictive validity of the ABIQ and a higher likelihood of overestimating FSIQ, regardless of diagnosis. Overall, we found more similarities than differences between the ASD and ADHD groups. Our results show that the SB-5 ABIQ is generally a strong predictor of FSIQ in youth with neurodevelopmental disorders. However, the use of the SB-5 ABIQ in research and clinical applications, without consideration of scatter on routing subtests, is potentially problematic. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.3034 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=518
in Autism Research > 16-12 (December 2023) . - p.2350-2363[article] Measuring intelligence in Autism and ADHD: Measurement invariance of the-Binet 5th edition and impact of subtest scatter on abbreviated IQ accuracy [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Ann LEVINE, Auteur ; Nicholas C. C. RUSSELL, Auteur ; John HORACK, Auteur ; Eric M. BUTTER, Auteur . - p.2350-2363.
in Autism Research > 16-12 (December 2023) . - p.2350-2363
Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Abstract Scatter and heterogeneity in cognitive profiles is thought to be common in autism spectrum disorder (ASD), which may indicate differences in the construct of IQ. However, less research has investigated IQ scatter in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Scatter is also thought to negatively impact the predictive validity of IQ summary scores, although there is research refuting this notion. Abbreviated IQ tests, such as the Stanford-Binet fifth edition (SB-5) abbreviated battery IQ (ABIQ), may be especially susceptible to the influence of scatter. We tested the measurement invariance of the SB-5 as well as the predictive validity of the ABIQ in predicting FSIQ in 1679 youth (21% female) ages 2-16?years with a clinical diagnosis of ASD or ADHD. Results indicated the SB-5 is measuring IQ the same way in ASD and ADHD. There were no differences between diagnostic groups in scatter between ABIQ (i.e., routing) subtests. Additionally, scatter was not related to dimensional autistic traits. Higher degree of scatter was associated with poorer predictive validity of the ABIQ and a higher likelihood of overestimating FSIQ, regardless of diagnosis. Overall, we found more similarities than differences between the ASD and ADHD groups. Our results show that the SB-5 ABIQ is generally a strong predictor of FSIQ in youth with neurodevelopmental disorders. However, the use of the SB-5 ABIQ in research and clinical applications, without consideration of scatter on routing subtests, is potentially problematic. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.3034 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=518