Challenges with shifting, regardless of disengagement: attention mechanisms and eye movements in Williams syndrome / Astrid HALLMAN in Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 17 (2025)  

Public ISBD [article]  inJournal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders > 17 (2025) Titre : Challenges with shifting, regardless of disengagement: attention mechanisms and eye movements in Williams syndrome Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Astrid HALLMAN, Auteur ; Charlotte WILLFORS, Auteur ; Christine FAWCETT, Auteur ; Matilda A. FRICK, Auteur ; Ann NORDGREN, Auteur ; Johan Lundin KLEBERG, Auteur Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Eye tracking  Intellectual disability  Orienting attention  Phasic alerting effect  Pupil dilation  Shifting attention  Visual disengagement  Williams syndrome  in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and received approval from the  Regional Ethics Committee of Stockholm, Sweden (dnr 2018/1218-31 with subsequent  amendments). Informed consents were collected from the participants and/or their  legal guardians. Informed assent was obtained from all participants who were able  to assent. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The  authors declare no competing interests. Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : BACKGROUND: People with Williams syndrome (WS) face challenges in various areas of cognitive processing, including attention. Previous studies suggest that these challenges are particularly pronounced when disengagement of attention from a previously attended stimulus is required, as compared to shifting attention without the need to disengage. Difficulties with attention could in turn be implicated in several of the behavioral characteristics of WS. Here, disengagement and shifting of visual attention, together with pupil dilation, were independently assessed in one of the largest eye-tracking studies of WS to date. METHODS: We investigated shifting, disengagement, and the effects of auditory alerting cues on pupil dilation in WS individuals (n = 45, age range = 9–58 years), non-WS individuals with intellectual disability (ID) (n = 36, age range = 6–59 years), and typically developed (TD) infants (n = 32, age range = 6–7 months), children and adults (n = 31, age range = 9–60 years), using a modified gap-overlap task. Data were analyzed using linear mixed-effect models (LMMs). RESULTS: Individuals with WS were less likely to shift their attention to upcoming targets than TD individuals (all ages), but more likely than the ID group to do so. When they did shift attention, participants with WS and ID were slower to initiate a gaze shift than TD participants regardless of whether disengagement was needed. In the WS group, failure to shift attention was strongly predicted by higher arousal (pupil dilation), which was induced by auditory alerting cues. CONCLUSIONS: Contrasting with previous theories of attention in WS, we found no evidence for a specific challenge in disengaging attention. Instead, our results point to a more general challenge in shifting attention. Reduced attention shifting in WS may be partly explained by atypical arousal regulation. These results contribute to our understanding of the WS phenotype. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s11689-025-09639-z. En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s11689-025-09639-z Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=576 [article] Challenges with shifting, regardless of disengagement: attention mechanisms and eye movements in Williams syndrome [texte imprimé] / Astrid HALLMAN, Auteur ; Charlotte WILLFORS, Auteur ; Christine FAWCETT, Auteur ; Matilda A. FRICK, Auteur ; Ann NORDGREN, Auteur ; Johan Lundin KLEBERG, Auteur. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders > 17 (2025) Mots-clés : Eye tracking  Intellectual disability  Orienting attention  Phasic alerting effect  Pupil dilation  Shifting attention  Visual disengagement  Williams syndrome  in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and received approval from the  Regional Ethics Committee of Stockholm, Sweden (dnr 2018/1218-31 with subsequent  amendments). Informed consents were collected from the participants and/or their  legal guardians. Informed assent was obtained from all participants who were able  to assent. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The  authors declare no competing interests. Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : BACKGROUND: People with Williams syndrome (WS) face challenges in various areas of cognitive processing, including attention. Previous studies suggest that these challenges are particularly pronounced when disengagement of attention from a previously attended stimulus is required, as compared to shifting attention without the need to disengage. Difficulties with attention could in turn be implicated in several of the behavioral characteristics of WS. Here, disengagement and shifting of visual attention, together with pupil dilation, were independently assessed in one of the largest eye-tracking studies of WS to date. METHODS: We investigated shifting, disengagement, and the effects of auditory alerting cues on pupil dilation in WS individuals (n = 45, age range = 9–58 years), non-WS individuals with intellectual disability (ID) (n = 36, age range = 6–59 years), and typically developed (TD) infants (n = 32, age range = 6–7 months), children and adults (n = 31, age range = 9–60 years), using a modified gap-overlap task. Data were analyzed using linear mixed-effect models (LMMs). RESULTS: Individuals with WS were less likely to shift their attention to upcoming targets than TD individuals (all ages), but more likely than the ID group to do so. When they did shift attention, participants with WS and ID were slower to initiate a gaze shift than TD participants regardless of whether disengagement was needed. In the WS group, failure to shift attention was strongly predicted by higher arousal (pupil dilation), which was induced by auditory alerting cues. CONCLUSIONS: Contrasting with previous theories of attention in WS, we found no evidence for a specific challenge in disengaging attention. Instead, our results point to a more general challenge in shifting attention. Reduced attention shifting in WS may be partly explained by atypical arousal regulation. These results contribute to our understanding of the WS phenotype. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s11689-025-09639-z. En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s11689-025-09639-z Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=576

---

1 (1 - 1 / 1) Par page : 25 50 100 200