Brief Report: Rural–Urban Differences in Disability Prevalence, Healthcare Services Utilization, and Participation in Special Education / Emma K. BOSWELL in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 56-9 (September 2026)  

Public ISBD [article]  inJournal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 56-9 (September 2026) . - p.3731-3743 Titre : Brief Report: Rural–Urban Differences in Disability Prevalence, Healthcare Services Utilization, and Participation in Special Education Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Emma K. BOSWELL, Auteur ; Elizabeth CROUCH, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.3731-3743 Langues : Anglais (eng) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Previous research has found that rural children are more likely to be disabled but are less likely to receive care. Both rural and disabled children were significantly impacted by the pandemic, particularly in terms of service utilization. Therefore, this study seeks to identify rural–urban differences in the prevalence of various disability indicators and in the receipt of educational and healthcare services. Data from 12,828 children aged 2–17 who participated in the 2021–2022 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) was used to examine rural–urban differences in three different disability indicators and in education and health services utilization. Disability indicators included the Washington Group Short Set Composite Disability Indicator, a developmental disability indicator, and a neurodivergence indicator. Bivariate analysis, via Rao-Scott chi-square tests, was used to examine rural–urban disparities. Compared to their urban counterparts, rural children were more likely to have a positive Washington Group Short Set Composite Disability Indicator (14.3% vs. 10.6%) and neurodivergence indicator (17Ð.3% vs. 14.1%). Rural children with disabilities were more likely to have received prescription medication for behavioral, mental, or emotional health or concentration in the past year than urban children (34.2% vs. 25.9%). There was no rural–urban difference in the prevalence of developmental disabilities or other forms of health care use and special education participation. This report highlights the need for further investigation into underlying causes of rural–urban disparities in the prevalence of disabilities, as well as the need for continued support for programs and policies designed to support rural children with disabilities. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-024-06434-y Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=591 [article] Brief Report: Rural–Urban Differences in Disability Prevalence, Healthcare Services Utilization, and Participation in Special Education [texte imprimé] / Emma K. BOSWELL, Auteur ; Elizabeth CROUCH, Auteur . - p.3731-3743. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 56-9 (September 2026) . - p.3731-3743 Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Previous research has found that rural children are more likely to be disabled but are less likely to receive care. Both rural and disabled children were significantly impacted by the pandemic, particularly in terms of service utilization. Therefore, this study seeks to identify rural–urban differences in the prevalence of various disability indicators and in the receipt of educational and healthcare services. Data from 12,828 children aged 2–17 who participated in the 2021–2022 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) was used to examine rural–urban differences in three different disability indicators and in education and health services utilization. Disability indicators included the Washington Group Short Set Composite Disability Indicator, a developmental disability indicator, and a neurodivergence indicator. Bivariate analysis, via Rao-Scott chi-square tests, was used to examine rural–urban disparities. Compared to their urban counterparts, rural children were more likely to have a positive Washington Group Short Set Composite Disability Indicator (14.3% vs. 10.6%) and neurodivergence indicator (17Ð.3% vs. 14.1%). Rural children with disabilities were more likely to have received prescription medication for behavioral, mental, or emotional health or concentration in the past year than urban children (34.2% vs. 25.9%). There was no rural–urban difference in the prevalence of developmental disabilities or other forms of health care use and special education participation. This report highlights the need for further investigation into underlying causes of rural–urban disparities in the prevalence of disabilities, as well as the need for continued support for programs and policies designed to support rural children with disabilities. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-024-06434-y Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=591

---

1 (1 - 1 / 1) Par page : 25 50 100 200