Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Janet HATCHER |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (1)
Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
Efficacy of small group reading intervention for beginning readers with reading-delay: a randomised controlled trial / Peter J. HATCHER in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47-8 (August 2006)
[article]
Titre : Efficacy of small group reading intervention for beginning readers with reading-delay: a randomised controlled trial Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Peter J. HATCHER, Auteur ; Margaret J. SNOWLING, Auteur ; Charles HULME, Auteur ; Jeremy N.V. MILES, Auteur ; Julia M. CARROLL, Auteur ; Janet HATCHER, Auteur ; Simon GIBBS, Auteur ; Glynnis SMITH, Auteur ; Claudine BOWYER-CRANE, Auteur Année de publication : 2006 Article en page(s) : p.820–827 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Reading-intervention remedial-teaching reading-difficulties randomised-controlled-trial Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background: This study evaluated the effectiveness of an intervention for reading-delayed children in Year-1 classes.
Methods: A sample (N = 77) of children drawn from 14 schools representing those with the weakest reading skills were randomly allocated to one of two groups. A 20-week intervention group received the intervention for two consecutive 10-week periods, while a 10-week intervention group only received the intervention for the second 10 weeks of the study. The programme was delivered in daily 20-minute sessions that alternated between small group (N = 3) and individual teaching. The programme combined phoneme awareness training, word and text reading, and phonological linkage exercises.
Results: The children receiving the intervention during the first 10-week period made significantly more progress on measures of letter knowledge, single word reading, and phoneme awareness than children not receiving the intervention. However, the children who only received the intervention during the second 10-week period made rapid progress and appeared to catch up with the children who had been given the more prolonged intervention. Failure to respond to the intervention was predicted by poor initial literacy skills and being in receipt of free school meals.
Conclusion: A reading intervention programme delivered on a daily basis by trained teaching assistants is an effective intervention for children who show reading delays at the end of their first year in school. However, around one-quarter of the children did not respond to this intervention and these children would appear to need more intensive or more prolonged help to improve their reading skills.En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.01559.x Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=768
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 47-8 (August 2006) . - p.820–827[article] Efficacy of small group reading intervention for beginning readers with reading-delay: a randomised controlled trial [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Peter J. HATCHER, Auteur ; Margaret J. SNOWLING, Auteur ; Charles HULME, Auteur ; Jeremy N.V. MILES, Auteur ; Julia M. CARROLL, Auteur ; Janet HATCHER, Auteur ; Simon GIBBS, Auteur ; Glynnis SMITH, Auteur ; Claudine BOWYER-CRANE, Auteur . - 2006 . - p.820–827.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 47-8 (August 2006) . - p.820–827
Mots-clés : Reading-intervention remedial-teaching reading-difficulties randomised-controlled-trial Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background: This study evaluated the effectiveness of an intervention for reading-delayed children in Year-1 classes.
Methods: A sample (N = 77) of children drawn from 14 schools representing those with the weakest reading skills were randomly allocated to one of two groups. A 20-week intervention group received the intervention for two consecutive 10-week periods, while a 10-week intervention group only received the intervention for the second 10 weeks of the study. The programme was delivered in daily 20-minute sessions that alternated between small group (N = 3) and individual teaching. The programme combined phoneme awareness training, word and text reading, and phonological linkage exercises.
Results: The children receiving the intervention during the first 10-week period made significantly more progress on measures of letter knowledge, single word reading, and phoneme awareness than children not receiving the intervention. However, the children who only received the intervention during the second 10-week period made rapid progress and appeared to catch up with the children who had been given the more prolonged intervention. Failure to respond to the intervention was predicted by poor initial literacy skills and being in receipt of free school meals.
Conclusion: A reading intervention programme delivered on a daily basis by trained teaching assistants is an effective intervention for children who show reading delays at the end of their first year in school. However, around one-quarter of the children did not respond to this intervention and these children would appear to need more intensive or more prolonged help to improve their reading skills.En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.01559.x Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=768