Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Pamela J. BROWN |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (1)
Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
Maximizing resilience through diverse levels of inquiry: Prevailing paradigms, possibilities, and priorities for the future / Suniya S. LUTHAR in Development and Psychopathology, 19-3 (Summer 2007)
[article]
Titre : Maximizing resilience through diverse levels of inquiry: Prevailing paradigms, possibilities, and priorities for the future Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Suniya S. LUTHAR, Auteur ; Pamela J. BROWN, Auteur Année de publication : 2007 Article en page(s) : p.931-955 Langues : Anglais (eng) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The study of resilience has two core characteristics: it is fundamentally applied in nature, seeking to use scientific knowledge to maximize well-being among those at risk, and it draws on expertise from diverse scientific disciplines. Recent advances in biological processes have confirmed the profound deleterious effects of harsh caregiving environments, thereby underscoring the importance of early interventions. What remains to be established at this time is the degree to which insights on particular biological processes (e.g., involving specific brain regions, genes, or hormones) will be applied in the near future to achieve substantial reductions in mental health disparities. Aside from biology, resilience developmental researchers would do well to draw upon relevant evidence from other behavioral sciences as well, notably anthropology as well as family, counseling, and social psychology. Scientists working with adults and with children must remain vigilant to the advances and missteps in each others' work, always ensuring caution in conveying messages about the “innateness” of resilience or its prevalence across different subgroups. Our future research agenda must prioritize reducing abuse and neglect in close relationships; deriving the “critical ingredients” in effective interventions and going to scale with these; working collaboratively to refine theory on the construct; and responsibly, proactively disseminating what we have learned about the nature, limits, and antecedents of resilient adaptation across diverse at-risk groups. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954579407000454 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=167
in Development and Psychopathology > 19-3 (Summer 2007) . - p.931-955[article] Maximizing resilience through diverse levels of inquiry: Prevailing paradigms, possibilities, and priorities for the future [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Suniya S. LUTHAR, Auteur ; Pamela J. BROWN, Auteur . - 2007 . - p.931-955.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Development and Psychopathology > 19-3 (Summer 2007) . - p.931-955
Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The study of resilience has two core characteristics: it is fundamentally applied in nature, seeking to use scientific knowledge to maximize well-being among those at risk, and it draws on expertise from diverse scientific disciplines. Recent advances in biological processes have confirmed the profound deleterious effects of harsh caregiving environments, thereby underscoring the importance of early interventions. What remains to be established at this time is the degree to which insights on particular biological processes (e.g., involving specific brain regions, genes, or hormones) will be applied in the near future to achieve substantial reductions in mental health disparities. Aside from biology, resilience developmental researchers would do well to draw upon relevant evidence from other behavioral sciences as well, notably anthropology as well as family, counseling, and social psychology. Scientists working with adults and with children must remain vigilant to the advances and missteps in each others' work, always ensuring caution in conveying messages about the “innateness” of resilience or its prevalence across different subgroups. Our future research agenda must prioritize reducing abuse and neglect in close relationships; deriving the “critical ingredients” in effective interventions and going to scale with these; working collaboratively to refine theory on the construct; and responsibly, proactively disseminating what we have learned about the nature, limits, and antecedents of resilient adaptation across diverse at-risk groups. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954579407000454 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=167