Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Résultat de la recherche
1 recherche sur le mot-clé 'Adhd academic achievement attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder comorbidity processing speed sluggish cognitive tempo working memory'
Affiner la recherche Générer le flux rss de la recherche
Partager le résultat de cette recherche Faire une suggestion
Differential impact of trait sluggish cognitive tempo and ADHD inattention in early childhood on adolescent functioning / Stephen P. BECKER in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 59-10 (October 2018)
[article]
Titre : Differential impact of trait sluggish cognitive tempo and ADHD inattention in early childhood on adolescent functioning Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Stephen P. BECKER, Auteur ; G. Leonard BURNS, Auteur ; D. R. LEOPOLD, Auteur ; R. K. OLSON, Auteur ; E. G. WILLCUTT, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.1094-1104 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Adhd academic achievement attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder comorbidity processing speed sluggish cognitive tempo working memory Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : BACKGROUND: Sluggish cognitive tempo (SCT) is distinct from attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder inattention (ADHD-IN) and concurrently associated with a range of impairment domains. However, few longitudinal studies have examined SCT as a longitudinal predictor of adjustment. Studies to date have all used a relatively short longitudinal time span (6 months to 2 years) and only rating scale measures of adjustment. Using a prospective, multi-method design, this study examined whether SCT and ADHD-IN were differentially associated with functioning over a 10-year period between preschool and the end of ninth grade. METHODS: Latent state-trait modeling determined the trait variance (i.e. consistency across occasions) of SCT and ADHD-IN across four measurement points (preschool and the end of kindergarten, first grade, and second grade) in a large population-based longitudinal sample (N = 976). Regression analyses were used to examine trait SCT and ADHD-IN factors in early childhood as predictors of functioning at the end of ninth grade (i.e. parent ratings of psychopathology and social/academic functioning, reading and mathematics academic achievement scores, processing speed and working memory). RESULTS: Both SCT and ADHD-IN contained more trait variance (Ms = 65% and 61%, respectively) than occasion-specific variance (Ms = 35% and 39%) in early childhood, with trait variance increasing as children progressed from preschool through early elementary school. In regression analyses: (a) SCT significantly predicted greater withdrawal and anxiety/depression whereas ADHD-IN did not uniquely predict these internalizing domains; (b) ADHD-IN uniquely predicted more externalizing behaviors whereas SCT uniquely predicted fewer externalizing behaviors; (c) SCT uniquely predicted shyness whereas both SCT and ADHD-IN uniquely predicted global social difficulties; and (d) ADHD-IN uniquely predicted poorer math achievement and slower processing speed whereas SCT more consistently predicted poorer reading achievement. CONCLUSIONS: Findings of this study - from the longest prospective sample to date - provide the clearest evidence yet that SCT and ADHD-IN often differ when it comes to the functional outcomes they predict. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12946 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=369
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 59-10 (October 2018) . - p.1094-1104[article] Differential impact of trait sluggish cognitive tempo and ADHD inattention in early childhood on adolescent functioning [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Stephen P. BECKER, Auteur ; G. Leonard BURNS, Auteur ; D. R. LEOPOLD, Auteur ; R. K. OLSON, Auteur ; E. G. WILLCUTT, Auteur . - p.1094-1104.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 59-10 (October 2018) . - p.1094-1104
Mots-clés : Adhd academic achievement attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder comorbidity processing speed sluggish cognitive tempo working memory Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : BACKGROUND: Sluggish cognitive tempo (SCT) is distinct from attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder inattention (ADHD-IN) and concurrently associated with a range of impairment domains. However, few longitudinal studies have examined SCT as a longitudinal predictor of adjustment. Studies to date have all used a relatively short longitudinal time span (6 months to 2 years) and only rating scale measures of adjustment. Using a prospective, multi-method design, this study examined whether SCT and ADHD-IN were differentially associated with functioning over a 10-year period between preschool and the end of ninth grade. METHODS: Latent state-trait modeling determined the trait variance (i.e. consistency across occasions) of SCT and ADHD-IN across four measurement points (preschool and the end of kindergarten, first grade, and second grade) in a large population-based longitudinal sample (N = 976). Regression analyses were used to examine trait SCT and ADHD-IN factors in early childhood as predictors of functioning at the end of ninth grade (i.e. parent ratings of psychopathology and social/academic functioning, reading and mathematics academic achievement scores, processing speed and working memory). RESULTS: Both SCT and ADHD-IN contained more trait variance (Ms = 65% and 61%, respectively) than occasion-specific variance (Ms = 35% and 39%) in early childhood, with trait variance increasing as children progressed from preschool through early elementary school. In regression analyses: (a) SCT significantly predicted greater withdrawal and anxiety/depression whereas ADHD-IN did not uniquely predict these internalizing domains; (b) ADHD-IN uniquely predicted more externalizing behaviors whereas SCT uniquely predicted fewer externalizing behaviors; (c) SCT uniquely predicted shyness whereas both SCT and ADHD-IN uniquely predicted global social difficulties; and (d) ADHD-IN uniquely predicted poorer math achievement and slower processing speed whereas SCT more consistently predicted poorer reading achievement. CONCLUSIONS: Findings of this study - from the longest prospective sample to date - provide the clearest evidence yet that SCT and ADHD-IN often differ when it comes to the functional outcomes they predict. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12946 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=369