Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Résultat de la recherche
1 recherche sur le mot-clé 'Measurement externalizing-symptoms interview checklist'
Affiner la recherche Générer le flux rss de la recherche
Partager le résultat de cette recherche Faire une suggestion
The comparability of mother-report structured interviews and checklists for the quantification of youth externalizing symptoms / Melanie A. DIRKS in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 51-9 (September 2010)
[article]
Titre : The comparability of mother-report structured interviews and checklists for the quantification of youth externalizing symptoms Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Melanie A. DIRKS, Auteur ; Michael H. BOYLE, Auteur Année de publication : 2010 Article en page(s) : p.1040-1049 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Measurement externalizing-symptoms interview checklist Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background: Although structured interviews are assumed to be scientifically superior to checklists for measuring youth psychopathology, few studies have tested this hypothesis. Interviews place a much greater burden on respondents, making it critical to determine their added value when quantifying psychiatric symptoms.
Methods: Confirmatory factor analysis was used to compare interviews and checklists in community (N = 251) and clinically referred (N = 406) samples of youth aged 5 to 17 years. We examined the associations between mother-reported externalizing symptoms assessed by interview versus checklist against (a) teacher-reported externalizing symptoms, and (b) child’s gender, academic performance, single- versus two-parent family, and family income. Models in which associations were estimated freely were contrasted to models in which the interview and the checklist were constrained to have equal associations with the variables. Finding these models fit comparably would suggest no difference between interviews and checklists.
Results: In the community sample, both the constrained and unconstrained models provided comparable fit to the data, suggesting no marked differences between interviews and checklists. In the clinical sample, associations with the interview were generally stronger. Reducing the number of items on the interview to match those on the 6-item checklist eliminated these differences, suggesting that the increased reliability of the interview scales, afforded by additional items, enhanced their quantification of psychopathology.
Conclusions: Consistent with previous studies, interviews were not notably superior to checklists for the measurement of externalizing symptoms. When only a few items are used, small performance differences between checklists and interviews may be due to scale length.En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02244.x Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=108
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 51-9 (September 2010) . - p.1040-1049[article] The comparability of mother-report structured interviews and checklists for the quantification of youth externalizing symptoms [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Melanie A. DIRKS, Auteur ; Michael H. BOYLE, Auteur . - 2010 . - p.1040-1049.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 51-9 (September 2010) . - p.1040-1049
Mots-clés : Measurement externalizing-symptoms interview checklist Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background: Although structured interviews are assumed to be scientifically superior to checklists for measuring youth psychopathology, few studies have tested this hypothesis. Interviews place a much greater burden on respondents, making it critical to determine their added value when quantifying psychiatric symptoms.
Methods: Confirmatory factor analysis was used to compare interviews and checklists in community (N = 251) and clinically referred (N = 406) samples of youth aged 5 to 17 years. We examined the associations between mother-reported externalizing symptoms assessed by interview versus checklist against (a) teacher-reported externalizing symptoms, and (b) child’s gender, academic performance, single- versus two-parent family, and family income. Models in which associations were estimated freely were contrasted to models in which the interview and the checklist were constrained to have equal associations with the variables. Finding these models fit comparably would suggest no difference between interviews and checklists.
Results: In the community sample, both the constrained and unconstrained models provided comparable fit to the data, suggesting no marked differences between interviews and checklists. In the clinical sample, associations with the interview were generally stronger. Reducing the number of items on the interview to match those on the 6-item checklist eliminated these differences, suggesting that the increased reliability of the interview scales, afforded by additional items, enhanced their quantification of psychopathology.
Conclusions: Consistent with previous studies, interviews were not notably superior to checklists for the measurement of externalizing symptoms. When only a few items are used, small performance differences between checklists and interviews may be due to scale length.En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02244.x Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=108