2 recherche sur le mot-clé 'disruptive child behavior'

Have parenting programs for disruptive child behavior become less effective? / Patty LEIJTEN in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 67-1 (January 2026)  

Public ISBD [article]  inJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 67-1 (January 2026) . - p.127-137 Titre : Have parenting programs for disruptive child behavior become less effective? Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Patty LEIJTEN, Auteur ; G.J. MELENDEZ-TORRES, Auteur ; Sophia BACKHAUS, Auteur ; Frances GARDNER, Auteur ; Annabeth P. GROENMAN, Auteur ; Tycho J. DEKKERS, Auteur ; Barbara J. VAN DEN HOOFDAKKER, Auteur ; Liina Björg LAAS SIGURÐARDÓTTIR, Auteur ; Danni LIU, Auteur ; Marjolein LUMAN, Auteur ; Lara MANSUR, Auteur ; Merlin NIETERAU, Auteur ; Saskia VAN DER OORD, Auteur ; Geertjan OVERBEEK, Auteur ; Constantina PSYLLOU, Auteur ; Karen RIENKS, Auteur ; Susanne SCHULZ, Auteur ; John R. WEISZ, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.127-137 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Behavioral parenting program  disruptive child behavior  systematic review  meta-analysis  time trends Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background Behavioral parenting programs have been exhaustively studied over the past five decades. We used this wealth of research to examine how estimates of parenting program effects have evolved over time, and if any time trends in effect estimates can be explained by trial, sample, or intervention characteristics. Methods We based our meta-analysis on a systematic search of 22 international and regional databases, gray literature, and 4 trial registries for randomized controlled trials of behavioral parenting programs. Results We identified 244 eligible trials (1,100 effect sizes; 28,916 families) from 36 countries. Parenting program effects initially reduced and then stabilized. More recent trials used more rigorous methods (e.g., more active control conditions and less risk of bias), samples that were generally older and included more girls, and evaluated interventions that on average had fewer sessions, were more often delivered by independent staff and made less use of time-out. However, none of these developments explained the initial reduction in effect size estimates during the first decades. Conclusions Our findings suggest that estimates of parenting program effects are currently stable: Effect sizes are no longer reducing but there is also no evidence of increases over time. Experimentation with the content, delivery, and personalization of parenting programs is needed to identify ways to increase program effects. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.70049 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=578 [article] Have parenting programs for disruptive child behavior become less effective? [texte imprimé] / Patty LEIJTEN, Auteur ; G.J. MELENDEZ-TORRES, Auteur ; Sophia BACKHAUS, Auteur ; Frances GARDNER, Auteur ; Annabeth P. GROENMAN, Auteur ; Tycho J. DEKKERS, Auteur ; Barbara J. VAN DEN HOOFDAKKER, Auteur ; Liina Björg LAAS SIGURÐARDÓTTIR, Auteur ; Danni LIU, Auteur ; Marjolein LUMAN, Auteur ; Lara MANSUR, Auteur ; Merlin NIETERAU, Auteur ; Saskia VAN DER OORD, Auteur ; Geertjan OVERBEEK, Auteur ; Constantina PSYLLOU, Auteur ; Karen RIENKS, Auteur ; Susanne SCHULZ, Auteur ; John R. WEISZ, Auteur . - p.127-137. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 67-1 (January 2026) . - p.127-137 Mots-clés : Behavioral parenting program  disruptive child behavior  systematic review  meta-analysis  time trends Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background Behavioral parenting programs have been exhaustively studied over the past five decades. We used this wealth of research to examine how estimates of parenting program effects have evolved over time, and if any time trends in effect estimates can be explained by trial, sample, or intervention characteristics. Methods We based our meta-analysis on a systematic search of 22 international and regional databases, gray literature, and 4 trial registries for randomized controlled trials of behavioral parenting programs. Results We identified 244 eligible trials (1,100 effect sizes; 28,916 families) from 36 countries. Parenting program effects initially reduced and then stabilized. More recent trials used more rigorous methods (e.g., more active control conditions and less risk of bias), samples that were generally older and included more girls, and evaluated interventions that on average had fewer sessions, were more often delivered by independent staff and made less use of time-out. However, none of these developments explained the initial reduction in effect size estimates during the first decades. Conclusions Our findings suggest that estimates of parenting program effects are currently stable: Effect sizes are no longer reducing but there is also no evidence of increases over time. Experimentation with the content, delivery, and personalization of parenting programs is needed to identify ways to increase program effects. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.70049 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=578

Research Review: The most effective parenting program content for disruptive child behavior - a network meta-analysis / Patty LEIJTEN in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 63-2 (February 2022)  

Public ISBD [article]  inJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 63-2 (February 2022) . - p.132-142 Titre : Research Review: The most effective parenting program content for disruptive child behavior - a network meta-analysis Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Patty LEIJTEN, Auteur ; G.J. MELENDEZ-TORRES, Auteur ; Frances E.M. GARDNER, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.132-142 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Parenting program  disruptive child behavior  effective components  network meta-analysis  systematic review Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : BACKGROUND: Programs to support parents are the recommended strategy to reduce disruptive child behavior problems. Efforts have been made to demonstrate which program components (i.e., clusters of techniques taught) increase program effects, but these methods fail to account for the fact that components rarely operate in isolation. We examine how combinations of components cluster together to form program types and use network meta-analysis to estimate the relative effects of these program types. METHODS: We updated an existing systematic review of parenting programs for disruptive child behavior and identified 197 randomized trials. We modeled clusters of components in each trial arm and chose the best-fitting model. We subsequently took 20 draws from the probability distribution of the latent class for each arm, entered each draw into a network meta-analysis model and combined findings using Rubin's rules. Combined estimates were bootstrapped to rank the clusters. We estimated main models and separate models for prevention and treatment settings. RESULTS: A five-class solution fit the data best: (1) behavior management; (2) behavior management with parental self-management; (3) behavior management with psychoeducation and relationship enhancement; (4) maximal component loading and (5) no/minimal component loading (i.e. control). In the main model and in treatment settings, all four program types were effective compared to no/minimal components. In prevention settings, only behavior management and behavior management with parental self-management were effective compared to no/minimal components. Probabilistic ranking showed that overall and in treatment settings, behavior management had the largest chance, and in prevention settings, behavior management with self-management had the largest chance, of being most effective compared to no/minimal components. CONCLUSIONS: Programs with more focused content seem more likely to yield stronger effects, and different foci may be needed in treatment versus prevention settings. Next steps include identifying individual family differences in optimal program content. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13483 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=457 [article] Research Review: The most effective parenting program content for disruptive child behavior - a network meta-analysis [texte imprimé] / Patty LEIJTEN, Auteur ; G.J. MELENDEZ-TORRES, Auteur ; Frances E.M. GARDNER, Auteur . - p.132-142. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 63-2 (February 2022) . - p.132-142 Mots-clés : Parenting program  disruptive child behavior  effective components  network meta-analysis  systematic review Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : BACKGROUND: Programs to support parents are the recommended strategy to reduce disruptive child behavior problems. Efforts have been made to demonstrate which program components (i.e., clusters of techniques taught) increase program effects, but these methods fail to account for the fact that components rarely operate in isolation. We examine how combinations of components cluster together to form program types and use network meta-analysis to estimate the relative effects of these program types. METHODS: We updated an existing systematic review of parenting programs for disruptive child behavior and identified 197 randomized trials. We modeled clusters of components in each trial arm and chose the best-fitting model. We subsequently took 20 draws from the probability distribution of the latent class for each arm, entered each draw into a network meta-analysis model and combined findings using Rubin's rules. Combined estimates were bootstrapped to rank the clusters. We estimated main models and separate models for prevention and treatment settings. RESULTS: A five-class solution fit the data best: (1) behavior management; (2) behavior management with parental self-management; (3) behavior management with psychoeducation and relationship enhancement; (4) maximal component loading and (5) no/minimal component loading (i.e. control). In the main model and in treatment settings, all four program types were effective compared to no/minimal components. In prevention settings, only behavior management and behavior management with parental self-management were effective compared to no/minimal components. Probabilistic ranking showed that overall and in treatment settings, behavior management had the largest chance, and in prevention settings, behavior management with self-management had the largest chance, of being most effective compared to no/minimal components. CONCLUSIONS: Programs with more focused content seem more likely to yield stronger effects, and different foci may be needed in treatment versus prevention settings. Next steps include identifying individual family differences in optimal program content. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13483 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=457