Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Résultat de la recherche
1 recherche sur le mot-clé 'interaction dominant dynamics'
Affiner la recherche Générer le flux rss de la recherche
Partager le résultat de cette recherche Faire une suggestion
Understanding the complexity of individual developmental pathways: A primer on metaphors, models, and methods to study resilience in development / Fred HASSELMAN in Development and Psychopathology, 35-5 (December 2023)
[article]
Titre : Understanding the complexity of individual developmental pathways: A primer on metaphors, models, and methods to study resilience in development Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Fred HASSELMAN, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.2186-2198 Mots-clés : Complex systems adaptation idiographic methods interaction dominant dynamics resilience Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The modern study of resilience in development is conceptually based on a complex adaptive system ontology in which many (intersystem) factors are involved in the emergence of resilient developmental pathways. However, the methods and models developed to study complex dynamical systems have not been widely adopted, and it has recently been noted this may constitute a problem moving the field forward. In the present paper, I argue that an ontological commitment to complex adaptive systems is not only possible, but highly recommended for the study of resilience in development. Such a commitment, however, also comes with a commitment to a different causal ontology and different research methods. In the first part of the paper, I discuss the extent to which current research on resilience in development conceptually adheres to the complex systems perspective. In the second part, I introduce conceptual tools that may help researchers conceptualize causality in complex systems. The third part discusses idiographic methods that could be used in a research program that embraces the interaction dominant causal ontology and idiosyncratic nature of the dynamics of complex systems. The conclusion is that a strong ontological commitment is warranted, but will require a radical departure from nomothetic science. En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579423001281 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=519
in Development and Psychopathology > 35-5 (December 2023) . - p.2186-2198[article] Understanding the complexity of individual developmental pathways: A primer on metaphors, models, and methods to study resilience in development [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Fred HASSELMAN, Auteur . - p.2186-2198.
in Development and Psychopathology > 35-5 (December 2023) . - p.2186-2198
Mots-clés : Complex systems adaptation idiographic methods interaction dominant dynamics resilience Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The modern study of resilience in development is conceptually based on a complex adaptive system ontology in which many (intersystem) factors are involved in the emergence of resilient developmental pathways. However, the methods and models developed to study complex dynamical systems have not been widely adopted, and it has recently been noted this may constitute a problem moving the field forward. In the present paper, I argue that an ontological commitment to complex adaptive systems is not only possible, but highly recommended for the study of resilience in development. Such a commitment, however, also comes with a commitment to a different causal ontology and different research methods. In the first part of the paper, I discuss the extent to which current research on resilience in development conceptually adheres to the complex systems perspective. In the second part, I introduce conceptual tools that may help researchers conceptualize causality in complex systems. The third part discusses idiographic methods that could be used in a research program that embraces the interaction dominant causal ontology and idiosyncratic nature of the dynamics of complex systems. The conclusion is that a strong ontological commitment is warranted, but will require a radical departure from nomothetic science. En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579423001281 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=519