Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Rebecca A JOHNSON |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (2)
Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
Exploring Human-Companion Animal Interaction in Families of Children with Autism / Gretchen K. CARLISLE in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 50-8 (August 2020)
[article]
Titre : Exploring Human-Companion Animal Interaction in Families of Children with Autism Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Gretchen K. CARLISLE, Auteur ; Rebecca A JOHNSON, Auteur ; Ze WANG, Auteur ; Timothy C. BROSI, Auteur ; Emily M. RIFE, Auteur ; Alisa HUTCHISON, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.2793-2805 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Autism Autistic children Companion animals Parent stress Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The study goal was to explore companion animal (CA) ownership in families of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), including parents' beliefs about benefits and burdens of CAs, as well as parent stress. Participants (N?=?764) completed online survey instruments anonymously. Findings revealed that parents with lower incomes perceived more benefits of CAs and their children were more strongly bonded with their CAs. Parents owning both a dog and cat perceived more benefits than those with only a dog or cat. Dog owners perceived more benefits than cat owners. Parents who perceived their CAs as providing more benefits had less stress. Provider implications are to consider recommending CAs to families of children with ASD for family benefits including lower parental stress. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-020-04390-x Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=428
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 50-8 (August 2020) . - p.2793-2805[article] Exploring Human-Companion Animal Interaction in Families of Children with Autism [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Gretchen K. CARLISLE, Auteur ; Rebecca A JOHNSON, Auteur ; Ze WANG, Auteur ; Timothy C. BROSI, Auteur ; Emily M. RIFE, Auteur ; Alisa HUTCHISON, Auteur . - p.2793-2805.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 50-8 (August 2020) . - p.2793-2805
Mots-clés : Autism Autistic children Companion animals Parent stress Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The study goal was to explore companion animal (CA) ownership in families of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), including parents' beliefs about benefits and burdens of CAs, as well as parent stress. Participants (N?=?764) completed online survey instruments anonymously. Findings revealed that parents with lower incomes perceived more benefits of CAs and their children were more strongly bonded with their CAs. Parents owning both a dog and cat perceived more benefits than those with only a dog or cat. Dog owners perceived more benefits than cat owners. Parents who perceived their CAs as providing more benefits had less stress. Provider implications are to consider recommending CAs to families of children with ASD for family benefits including lower parental stress. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-020-04390-x Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=428 US state variation in autism insurance mandates: Balancing access and fairness / Rebecca A JOHNSON in Autism, 18-7 (October 2014)
[article]
Titre : US state variation in autism insurance mandates: Balancing access and fairness Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Rebecca A JOHNSON, Auteur ; Marion DANIS, Auteur ; Chris HAFNER-EATON, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.803-814 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : autism distributive justice ethics health policy private insurance mandates Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : This article examines how nations split decision-making about health services between federal and sub-federal levels, creating variation between states or provinces. When is this variation ethically acceptable? We identify three sources of ethical acceptability—procedural fairness, value pluralism, and substantive fairness—and examine these sources with respect to a case study: the fact that only 30 out of 51 US states or territories passed mandates requiring private insurers to offer extensive coverage of autism behavioral therapies, creating variation for privately insured children living in different US states. Is this variation ethically acceptable? To address this question, we need to analyze whether mandates go to more or less needy states and whether the mandates reflect value pluralism between states regarding government’s role in health care. Using time-series logistic regressions and data from National Survey of Children with Special Health Care Needs, Individual with Disabilities Education Act, legislature political composition, and American Board of Pediatrics workforce data, we find that the states in which mandates are passed are less needy than states in which mandates have not been passed, what we call a cumulative advantage outcome that increases between-state disparities rather than a compensatory outcome that decreases between-state disparities. Concluding, we discuss the implications of our analysis for broader discussions of variation in health services provision. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1362361314529191 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=241
in Autism > 18-7 (October 2014) . - p.803-814[article] US state variation in autism insurance mandates: Balancing access and fairness [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Rebecca A JOHNSON, Auteur ; Marion DANIS, Auteur ; Chris HAFNER-EATON, Auteur . - p.803-814.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Autism > 18-7 (October 2014) . - p.803-814
Mots-clés : autism distributive justice ethics health policy private insurance mandates Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : This article examines how nations split decision-making about health services between federal and sub-federal levels, creating variation between states or provinces. When is this variation ethically acceptable? We identify three sources of ethical acceptability—procedural fairness, value pluralism, and substantive fairness—and examine these sources with respect to a case study: the fact that only 30 out of 51 US states or territories passed mandates requiring private insurers to offer extensive coverage of autism behavioral therapies, creating variation for privately insured children living in different US states. Is this variation ethically acceptable? To address this question, we need to analyze whether mandates go to more or less needy states and whether the mandates reflect value pluralism between states regarding government’s role in health care. Using time-series logistic regressions and data from National Survey of Children with Special Health Care Needs, Individual with Disabilities Education Act, legislature political composition, and American Board of Pediatrics workforce data, we find that the states in which mandates are passed are less needy than states in which mandates have not been passed, what we call a cumulative advantage outcome that increases between-state disparities rather than a compensatory outcome that decreases between-state disparities. Concluding, we discuss the implications of our analysis for broader discussions of variation in health services provision. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1362361314529191 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=241