Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Lore SAENEN |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (1)
Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
Comparing the percentage of non-overlapping data approach and the hierarchical linear modeling approach for synthesizing single-case studies in autism research / Mieke HEYVAERT in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 11 (March 2015)
[article]
Titre : Comparing the percentage of non-overlapping data approach and the hierarchical linear modeling approach for synthesizing single-case studies in autism research Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Mieke HEYVAERT, Auteur ; Lore SAENEN, Auteur ; Bea MAES, Auteur ; Patrick ONGHENA, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.112-125 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Single-case research Single-subject experimental designs Meta-analysis Systematic review Behavioral interventions Challenging behavior Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : We examined the performance of two approaches for synthesizing single-case experimental data: the percentage of non-overlapping data (PND) approach and the hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) approach. The comparison was performed by analyzing an empirical dataset on behavioral interventions for reducing challenging behavior in persons with autism by means of the two approaches. We compared the findings of both approaches for analyzing the outcomes of the behavioral interventions as well as for identifying moderating variables. With respect to the analysis of the interventions’ outcomes, similar positive results were found based on both approaches. With respect to the moderating variables, Functional analysis/assessment and Availability of follow up data were found to be statistically significant moderators by means of the PND as well as the HLM approach. The variables Intervention type, Availability of generalization attempts, Design type, and Availability of inter-rater reliability data were also found to be statistically significant moderators by means of the PND approach. The PND approach seems overly liberal in identifying statistically significant predictors in comparison to the HLM approach. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2014.12.002 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=260
in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders > 11 (March 2015) . - p.112-125[article] Comparing the percentage of non-overlapping data approach and the hierarchical linear modeling approach for synthesizing single-case studies in autism research [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Mieke HEYVAERT, Auteur ; Lore SAENEN, Auteur ; Bea MAES, Auteur ; Patrick ONGHENA, Auteur . - p.112-125.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders > 11 (March 2015) . - p.112-125
Mots-clés : Single-case research Single-subject experimental designs Meta-analysis Systematic review Behavioral interventions Challenging behavior Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : We examined the performance of two approaches for synthesizing single-case experimental data: the percentage of non-overlapping data (PND) approach and the hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) approach. The comparison was performed by analyzing an empirical dataset on behavioral interventions for reducing challenging behavior in persons with autism by means of the two approaches. We compared the findings of both approaches for analyzing the outcomes of the behavioral interventions as well as for identifying moderating variables. With respect to the analysis of the interventions’ outcomes, similar positive results were found based on both approaches. With respect to the moderating variables, Functional analysis/assessment and Availability of follow up data were found to be statistically significant moderators by means of the PND as well as the HLM approach. The variables Intervention type, Availability of generalization attempts, Design type, and Availability of inter-rater reliability data were also found to be statistically significant moderators by means of the PND approach. The PND approach seems overly liberal in identifying statistically significant predictors in comparison to the HLM approach. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2014.12.002 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=260