Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Tisha J. ORNSTEIN |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (2)
Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
Performance monitoring in children following traumatic brain injury / Tisha J. ORNSTEIN in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 50-4 (April 2009)
[article]
Titre : Performance monitoring in children following traumatic brain injury Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Tisha J. ORNSTEIN, Auteur ; Shirley X. CHEN, Auteur ; Gordon D. LOGAN, Auteur ; Jeffrey E. MAX, Auteur ; Marcia BARNES, Auteur ; Maureen DENNIS, Auteur ; Linda EWING-COBBS, Auteur ; Gerri HANTEN, Auteur ; Harvey S. LEVIN, Auteur ; Russell SCHACHAR, Auteur Année de publication : 2009 Article en page(s) : p. 506-513 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Performance-monitoring traumatic-brain-injury children head-injury neuropsychology pediatrics Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background: Executive control deficits are common sequelae of childhood traumatic brain injury (TBI). The goal of the current study was to assess a specific executive control function, performance monitoring, in children following TBI.
Methods: Thirty-one children with mild–moderate TBI, 18 with severe TBI, and 37 control children without TBI, of comparable age and sex, performed the stop signal task, a speeded choice reaction time task. On occasion, they were presented with a signal to stop their responses. Performance monitoring was defined as the extent of slowing in go-task reaction time following failure to stop responses.
Results: The TBI group as a whole demonstrated less post-error slowing than did controls. This finding suggested impaired error monitoring performance. In addition, time since injury and socioeconomic status predicted less slowing after stopped responses.
Conclusions: We suggest that alterations in performance monitoring expressed as the inability to notice, regulate and adjust behavior to changing situations are an effect of TBI in children.En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.01997.x Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=724
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 50-4 (April 2009) . - p. 506-513[article] Performance monitoring in children following traumatic brain injury [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Tisha J. ORNSTEIN, Auteur ; Shirley X. CHEN, Auteur ; Gordon D. LOGAN, Auteur ; Jeffrey E. MAX, Auteur ; Marcia BARNES, Auteur ; Maureen DENNIS, Auteur ; Linda EWING-COBBS, Auteur ; Gerri HANTEN, Auteur ; Harvey S. LEVIN, Auteur ; Russell SCHACHAR, Auteur . - 2009 . - p. 506-513.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 50-4 (April 2009) . - p. 506-513
Mots-clés : Performance-monitoring traumatic-brain-injury children head-injury neuropsychology pediatrics Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background: Executive control deficits are common sequelae of childhood traumatic brain injury (TBI). The goal of the current study was to assess a specific executive control function, performance monitoring, in children following TBI.
Methods: Thirty-one children with mild–moderate TBI, 18 with severe TBI, and 37 control children without TBI, of comparable age and sex, performed the stop signal task, a speeded choice reaction time task. On occasion, they were presented with a signal to stop their responses. Performance monitoring was defined as the extent of slowing in go-task reaction time following failure to stop responses.
Results: The TBI group as a whole demonstrated less post-error slowing than did controls. This finding suggested impaired error monitoring performance. In addition, time since injury and socioeconomic status predicted less slowing after stopped responses.
Conclusions: We suggest that alterations in performance monitoring expressed as the inability to notice, regulate and adjust behavior to changing situations are an effect of TBI in children.En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.01997.x Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=724 Predictive validity of DSM-IV and ICD-10 criteria for ADHD and hyperkinetic disorder / I. Lee SOYOUNG in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49-1 (January 2008)
[article]
Titre : Predictive validity of DSM-IV and ICD-10 criteria for ADHD and hyperkinetic disorder Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : I. Lee SOYOUNG, Auteur ; Russell J. SCHARCHAR, Auteur ; Shirley X. CHEN, Auteur ; Tisha J. ORNSTEIN, Auteur ; Alice CHARACH, Auteur ; Cathy BARR, Auteur ; Abel ICKOWICZ, Auteur Année de publication : 2007 Article en page(s) : p.70–78 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Attention-deficit-hyperactivity-disorder hyperkinetic-disorder DSM-IV ICD-10 diagnostic-algorithms ADD/ADHD Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background: The goal of this study was to compare the predictive validity of the two main diagnostic schemata for childhood hyperactivity – attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual– IV) and hyperkinetic disorder (HKD; International Classification of Diseases– 10th Edition).
Methods: Diagnostic criteria for ADHD and HKD were used to classify 419 children ages 6 to 16 years referred to a clinic for behavioral problems into one of four groups: HKD, ADHD combined subtype (ADHD-C), ADHD hyperactive-impulsive subtype (ADHD-HI), ADHD inattentive subtype (ADHD-IA). These groups were compared on clinical characteristics including total symptom severity, overall impairment, exposure to psychosocial and neuro-developmental risks, family history of ADHD in first-degree family members, rate and type of comorbidity, intelligence, academic achievement, and on laboratory tests of motor response inhibition and working memory with each other and with normal controls (47).
Results: Of the 419 cases, there were 46 HKD (11.0%), 200 ADHD-C (47.7%), 60 ADHD-HI (14.3%) and 113 ADHD-IA (27.0%) cases. The HKD group had more symptoms and was more impaired on teachers’ ratings than were the other groups. The ADHD-C and HKD groups had poorer inhibitory control than the ADHD-IA, ADHD-HI and control groups, and all four clinic groups showed inhibition deficit compared to controls. Groups did not differ in working memory. Compared to controls, the HKD, ADHD-C, ADHD-HI and ADHD-IA groups had higher familial risk of ADHD, greater psychosocial risk exposure, lower intellectual level and poorer academic attainment. However, we observed no differences among the clinic groups in these characteristics.
Conclusions: Like earlier versions, ICD-10 and DSM-IV continue to delineate diagnostic entities with substantially different prevalence in clinic samples. However, HKD, ADHD-C, ADHD-IA and ADHD-HI groups overlap substantially in terms of important clinical characteristics, although HKD and ADHD-C may be somewhat more severe variants of the condition than ADHD-IA and ADHD-HI.En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01784.x Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=311
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 49-1 (January 2008) . - p.70–78[article] Predictive validity of DSM-IV and ICD-10 criteria for ADHD and hyperkinetic disorder [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / I. Lee SOYOUNG, Auteur ; Russell J. SCHARCHAR, Auteur ; Shirley X. CHEN, Auteur ; Tisha J. ORNSTEIN, Auteur ; Alice CHARACH, Auteur ; Cathy BARR, Auteur ; Abel ICKOWICZ, Auteur . - 2007 . - p.70–78.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 49-1 (January 2008) . - p.70–78
Mots-clés : Attention-deficit-hyperactivity-disorder hyperkinetic-disorder DSM-IV ICD-10 diagnostic-algorithms ADD/ADHD Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background: The goal of this study was to compare the predictive validity of the two main diagnostic schemata for childhood hyperactivity – attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual– IV) and hyperkinetic disorder (HKD; International Classification of Diseases– 10th Edition).
Methods: Diagnostic criteria for ADHD and HKD were used to classify 419 children ages 6 to 16 years referred to a clinic for behavioral problems into one of four groups: HKD, ADHD combined subtype (ADHD-C), ADHD hyperactive-impulsive subtype (ADHD-HI), ADHD inattentive subtype (ADHD-IA). These groups were compared on clinical characteristics including total symptom severity, overall impairment, exposure to psychosocial and neuro-developmental risks, family history of ADHD in first-degree family members, rate and type of comorbidity, intelligence, academic achievement, and on laboratory tests of motor response inhibition and working memory with each other and with normal controls (47).
Results: Of the 419 cases, there were 46 HKD (11.0%), 200 ADHD-C (47.7%), 60 ADHD-HI (14.3%) and 113 ADHD-IA (27.0%) cases. The HKD group had more symptoms and was more impaired on teachers’ ratings than were the other groups. The ADHD-C and HKD groups had poorer inhibitory control than the ADHD-IA, ADHD-HI and control groups, and all four clinic groups showed inhibition deficit compared to controls. Groups did not differ in working memory. Compared to controls, the HKD, ADHD-C, ADHD-HI and ADHD-IA groups had higher familial risk of ADHD, greater psychosocial risk exposure, lower intellectual level and poorer academic attainment. However, we observed no differences among the clinic groups in these characteristics.
Conclusions: Like earlier versions, ICD-10 and DSM-IV continue to delineate diagnostic entities with substantially different prevalence in clinic samples. However, HKD, ADHD-C, ADHD-IA and ADHD-HI groups overlap substantially in terms of important clinical characteristics, although HKD and ADHD-C may be somewhat more severe variants of the condition than ADHD-IA and ADHD-HI.En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01784.x Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=311