Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur P. MONTGOMERY |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (1)
Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
Research Review: Cognitive bias modification of interpretations in youth and its effect on anxiety: a meta-analysis / G. KREBS in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 59-8 (August 2018)
[article]
Titre : Research Review: Cognitive bias modification of interpretations in youth and its effect on anxiety: a meta-analysis Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : G. KREBS, Auteur ; V. PILE, Auteur ; S. GRANT, Auteur ; M. DEGLI ESPOSTI, Auteur ; P. MONTGOMERY, Auteur ; J. Y. F. LAU, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.831-844 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Cognitive bias modification adolescents anxiety children interpretation bias training Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : BACKGROUND: Emerging evidence suggests that cognitive bias modification of interpretations (CBM-I) is effective in altering interpretation biases and reducing anxiety in adults. Less is known about the impact of CBM-I in young people, but some recent findings, including a meta-analysis of combined cognitive bias modification of interpretation and attention techniques, have cast doubt on its clinical utility. Given the current debate, this meta-analysis sought to establish the independent effects of CBM-I on interpretations biases and anxiety in youth. METHODS: Studies were identified through a systematic literature search of PsycINFO, Ovid MEDLINE, PsycARTICLES, Web of Science and EMBASE between January 1992 and March 2017. Eligible studies aimed to target interpretation biases; did not combine CBM-I with another intervention; included a control condition; randomly allocated participants to conditions; assessed interpretation bias and/or anxiety as an outcome; included individuals up to age 18; and did not present previously reported data. Reference lists of included articles were checked for further eligible studies, and authors were contacted for unpublished data. RESULTS: We identified 26 studies meeting eligibility criteria that included in the meta-analysis. CBM-I had moderate effects on negative and positive interpretations (g = -0.70 and g = -0.52, respectively) and a small but significant effect on anxiety assessed after training (g = -0.17) and after a stressor (g = -0.34). No significant moderators were identified. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to previous meta-analytic findings, our results indicate that CBM-I has potential but weak anxiolytic effects in youth. Our findings suggest that it may be premature to disregard the potential value of CBM-I research and further research in this field is warranted. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12809 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=368
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 59-8 (August 2018) . - p.831-844[article] Research Review: Cognitive bias modification of interpretations in youth and its effect on anxiety: a meta-analysis [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / G. KREBS, Auteur ; V. PILE, Auteur ; S. GRANT, Auteur ; M. DEGLI ESPOSTI, Auteur ; P. MONTGOMERY, Auteur ; J. Y. F. LAU, Auteur . - p.831-844.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 59-8 (August 2018) . - p.831-844
Mots-clés : Cognitive bias modification adolescents anxiety children interpretation bias training Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : BACKGROUND: Emerging evidence suggests that cognitive bias modification of interpretations (CBM-I) is effective in altering interpretation biases and reducing anxiety in adults. Less is known about the impact of CBM-I in young people, but some recent findings, including a meta-analysis of combined cognitive bias modification of interpretation and attention techniques, have cast doubt on its clinical utility. Given the current debate, this meta-analysis sought to establish the independent effects of CBM-I on interpretations biases and anxiety in youth. METHODS: Studies were identified through a systematic literature search of PsycINFO, Ovid MEDLINE, PsycARTICLES, Web of Science and EMBASE between January 1992 and March 2017. Eligible studies aimed to target interpretation biases; did not combine CBM-I with another intervention; included a control condition; randomly allocated participants to conditions; assessed interpretation bias and/or anxiety as an outcome; included individuals up to age 18; and did not present previously reported data. Reference lists of included articles were checked for further eligible studies, and authors were contacted for unpublished data. RESULTS: We identified 26 studies meeting eligibility criteria that included in the meta-analysis. CBM-I had moderate effects on negative and positive interpretations (g = -0.70 and g = -0.52, respectively) and a small but significant effect on anxiety assessed after training (g = -0.17) and after a stressor (g = -0.34). No significant moderators were identified. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to previous meta-analytic findings, our results indicate that CBM-I has potential but weak anxiolytic effects in youth. Our findings suggest that it may be premature to disregard the potential value of CBM-I research and further research in this field is warranted. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12809 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=368