Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Résultat de la recherche
3 recherche sur le mot-clé 'Child psychiatric disorder'
Affiner la recherche Générer le flux rss de la recherche
Partager le résultat de cette recherche Faire une suggestion
The Extended Version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire as a Guide to Child Psychiatric Caseness and Consequent Burden / Robert GOODMAN in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 40-5 (July 1999)
[article]
Titre : The Extended Version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire as a Guide to Child Psychiatric Caseness and Consequent Burden Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Robert GOODMAN, Auteur Année de publication : 1999 Article en page(s) : p.791-799 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Behaviour problems questionnaires screening burden child psychiatric disorder impact Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is a brief behavioural screening questionnaire that asks about children's and teenagers’ symptoms and positive attributes; the extended version also includes an impact supplement that asks if the respondent thinks the young person has a problem, and if so, enquires further about chronicity, distress, social impairment, and burden for others. Closely similar versions are completed by parents, teachers, and young people aged 11 or more. The validation study involved two groups of 5–15-year-olds: a community sample (N= 467) and a psychiatric clinic sample (N= 232). The two groups had markedly different distributions on the measures of perceived difficulties, impact (distress plus social impairment), and burden. Impact scores were better than symptom scores at discriminating between the community and clinic samples; discrimination based on the single “Is there a problem?” item was almost as good. The SDQ burden rating correlated well (r= .74) with a standardised interview rating of burden. For clinicians and researchers with an interest in psychiatric caseness and the determinants of service use, the impact supplement of the extended SDQ appears to provide useful additional information without taking up much more of respondents' time. Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=124
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 40-5 (July 1999) . - p.791-799[article] The Extended Version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire as a Guide to Child Psychiatric Caseness and Consequent Burden [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Robert GOODMAN, Auteur . - 1999 . - p.791-799.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 40-5 (July 1999) . - p.791-799
Mots-clés : Behaviour problems questionnaires screening burden child psychiatric disorder impact Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is a brief behavioural screening questionnaire that asks about children's and teenagers’ symptoms and positive attributes; the extended version also includes an impact supplement that asks if the respondent thinks the young person has a problem, and if so, enquires further about chronicity, distress, social impairment, and burden for others. Closely similar versions are completed by parents, teachers, and young people aged 11 or more. The validation study involved two groups of 5–15-year-olds: a community sample (N= 467) and a psychiatric clinic sample (N= 232). The two groups had markedly different distributions on the measures of perceived difficulties, impact (distress plus social impairment), and burden. Impact scores were better than symptom scores at discriminating between the community and clinic samples; discrimination based on the single “Is there a problem?” item was almost as good. The SDQ burden rating correlated well (r= .74) with a standardised interview rating of burden. For clinicians and researchers with an interest in psychiatric caseness and the determinants of service use, the impact supplement of the extended SDQ appears to provide useful additional information without taking up much more of respondents' time. Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=124 Can Autism Spectrum Disorders and Social Anxiety Disorders be Differentiated by the Social Responsiveness Scale in Children and Adolescents? / Hannah CHOLEMKERY in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44-5 (May 2014)
[article]
Titre : Can Autism Spectrum Disorders and Social Anxiety Disorders be Differentiated by the Social Responsiveness Scale in Children and Adolescents? Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Hannah CHOLEMKERY, Auteur ; Laura MOJICA, Auteur ; Sonja ROHRMANN, Auteur ; Angelika GENSTHALER, Auteur ; Christine M. FREITAG, Auteur Année de publication : 2014 Article en page(s) : p.1168-1182 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Psychometric assessment Differential diagnosis Child psychiatric disorder Autism spectrum disorder Social anxiety disorders Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) as well as social phobia (SP), and selective mutism (SM) are characterised by impaired social interaction. We assessed the validity of the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS) to differentiate between ASD, and SP/SM. Raw scores were compared in 6–18 year old individuals with ASD (N = 60), SP (N = 38), SM (N = 43), and typically developed (N = 42). Sensitivity and specificity were examined. The three disorders showed overlapping SRS scores. Especially in boys with SM (ROC–AUC = .81), presence of ASD was overestimated by the SRS. A combination of three disorder specific questionnaires resulted in marginally improved diagnostic accuracy. For the clinically very relevant differential diagnosis of SP/SM, SRS results must be interpreted with caution. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-013-1979-4 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=232
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 44-5 (May 2014) . - p.1168-1182[article] Can Autism Spectrum Disorders and Social Anxiety Disorders be Differentiated by the Social Responsiveness Scale in Children and Adolescents? [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Hannah CHOLEMKERY, Auteur ; Laura MOJICA, Auteur ; Sonja ROHRMANN, Auteur ; Angelika GENSTHALER, Auteur ; Christine M. FREITAG, Auteur . - 2014 . - p.1168-1182.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 44-5 (May 2014) . - p.1168-1182
Mots-clés : Psychometric assessment Differential diagnosis Child psychiatric disorder Autism spectrum disorder Social anxiety disorders Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) as well as social phobia (SP), and selective mutism (SM) are characterised by impaired social interaction. We assessed the validity of the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS) to differentiate between ASD, and SP/SM. Raw scores were compared in 6–18 year old individuals with ASD (N = 60), SP (N = 38), SM (N = 43), and typically developed (N = 42). Sensitivity and specificity were examined. The three disorders showed overlapping SRS scores. Especially in boys with SM (ROC–AUC = .81), presence of ASD was overestimated by the SRS. A combination of three disorder specific questionnaires resulted in marginally improved diagnostic accuracy. For the clinically very relevant differential diagnosis of SP/SM, SRS results must be interpreted with caution. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-013-1979-4 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=232 Sensitivity and Specificity of the ADOS-2 Algorithm in a Large German Sample / J. E. MEDDA in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 49-2 (February 2019)
[article]
Titre : Sensitivity and Specificity of the ADOS-2 Algorithm in a Large German Sample Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : J. E. MEDDA, Auteur ; H. CHOLEMKERY, Auteur ; C. M. FREITAG, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.750-761 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Autism spectrum disorder Child psychiatric disorder Diagnostic validity Psychometric assessment Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The aim of the present study was to establish diagnostic validity of the new algorithm of the Autism Diagnostic Observation Scale, the ADOS-2, to differentiate between ASD and other clinically relevant psychiatric and developmental disorders in a large German sample. Validity of ADOS and ADOS-2 diagnostic algorithms was established in 826 individuals (n = 455 autism, n = 216 autism spectrum, n = 155 non-ASD patients) by receiver operating curves. Confidence intervals overlapped largely for ADOS and ADOS-2 algorithms, confirming diagnostic validity of both algorithms. Adding information of the Social Communication Questionnaire and the Social Responsiveness Scale resulted in slightly improved classification rates for autism in Module 4. We thus replicated previous findings of the diagnostic validity of the ADOS-2 algorithms. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3750-3 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=382
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 49-2 (February 2019) . - p.750-761[article] Sensitivity and Specificity of the ADOS-2 Algorithm in a Large German Sample [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / J. E. MEDDA, Auteur ; H. CHOLEMKERY, Auteur ; C. M. FREITAG, Auteur . - p.750-761.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 49-2 (February 2019) . - p.750-761
Mots-clés : Autism spectrum disorder Child psychiatric disorder Diagnostic validity Psychometric assessment Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The aim of the present study was to establish diagnostic validity of the new algorithm of the Autism Diagnostic Observation Scale, the ADOS-2, to differentiate between ASD and other clinically relevant psychiatric and developmental disorders in a large German sample. Validity of ADOS and ADOS-2 diagnostic algorithms was established in 826 individuals (n = 455 autism, n = 216 autism spectrum, n = 155 non-ASD patients) by receiver operating curves. Confidence intervals overlapped largely for ADOS and ADOS-2 algorithms, confirming diagnostic validity of both algorithms. Adding information of the Social Communication Questionnaire and the Social Responsiveness Scale resulted in slightly improved classification rates for autism in Module 4. We thus replicated previous findings of the diagnostic validity of the ADOS-2 algorithms. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3750-3 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=382