Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Résultat de la recherche
3 recherche sur le mot-clé 'Diagnostic validity'
Affiner la recherche Générer le flux rss de la recherche
Partager le résultat de cette recherche Faire une suggestion
A Comparative Analysis of the ADOS-G and ADOS-2 Algorithms: Preliminary Findings / T. P. DORLACK in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 48-6 (June 2018)
[article]
Titre : A Comparative Analysis of the ADOS-G and ADOS-2 Algorithms: Preliminary Findings Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : T. P. DORLACK, Auteur ; O. B. MYERS, Auteur ; P. W. KODITUWAKKU, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.2078-2089 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Ados Autism spectrum disorders Comparative analysis Diagnostic accuracy Diagnostic validity Systematic literature review Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS) is a widely utilized observational assessment tool for diagnosis of autism spectrum disorders. The original ADOS was succeeded by the ADOS-G with noted improvements. More recently, the ADOS-2 was introduced to further increase its diagnostic accuracy. Studies examining the validity of the ADOS have produced mixed findings, and pooled relationship trends between the algorithm versions are yet to be analyzed. The current review seeks to compare the relative merits of the ADOS-G and ADOS-2 algorithms, Modules 1-3. Eight studies met inclusion criteria for the review, and six were selected for paired comparisons of the sensitivity and specificity of the ADOS. Results indicate several contradictory findings, underscoring the importance of further study. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3475-3 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=361
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 48-6 (June 2018) . - p.2078-2089[article] A Comparative Analysis of the ADOS-G and ADOS-2 Algorithms: Preliminary Findings [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / T. P. DORLACK, Auteur ; O. B. MYERS, Auteur ; P. W. KODITUWAKKU, Auteur . - p.2078-2089.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 48-6 (June 2018) . - p.2078-2089
Mots-clés : Ados Autism spectrum disorders Comparative analysis Diagnostic accuracy Diagnostic validity Systematic literature review Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS) is a widely utilized observational assessment tool for diagnosis of autism spectrum disorders. The original ADOS was succeeded by the ADOS-G with noted improvements. More recently, the ADOS-2 was introduced to further increase its diagnostic accuracy. Studies examining the validity of the ADOS have produced mixed findings, and pooled relationship trends between the algorithm versions are yet to be analyzed. The current review seeks to compare the relative merits of the ADOS-G and ADOS-2 algorithms, Modules 1-3. Eight studies met inclusion criteria for the review, and six were selected for paired comparisons of the sensitivity and specificity of the ADOS. Results indicate several contradictory findings, underscoring the importance of further study. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3475-3 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=361 A Review of Level 2 Parent-Report Instruments Used to Screen Children Aged 1.5–5 for Autism: A Meta-Analytic Update / Justin HAMPTON in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45-8 (August 2015)
[article]
Titre : A Review of Level 2 Parent-Report Instruments Used to Screen Children Aged 1.5–5 for Autism: A Meta-Analytic Update Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Justin HAMPTON, Auteur ; Paul S. STRAND, Auteur Année de publication : 2015 Article en page(s) : p.2519-2530 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Autism Autism spectrum disorder Assessment Screening Rating scales Diagnostic validity Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The present study utilized meta-analytic procedures to estimate the diagnostic validity of instruments used to screen young children, ages 1.5–5 years, for autism. Five scales met inclusion criteria, and data from 18 studies contributed the meta-analysis. Results revealed that 4 of 5 scales met criteria for “good” validity, including two broad band scales (instruments not restricted to screening for autism). The current results suggest that validity differences might be a function of how instruments sample across the DSM content domains. Specifically, high validity instruments included a higher proportion of items assessing social interaction skills. The availability of valid broad- and narrow-band instruments, as well as implications for constructing future screening instruments, is discussed. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-015-2419-4 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=263
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 45-8 (August 2015) . - p.2519-2530[article] A Review of Level 2 Parent-Report Instruments Used to Screen Children Aged 1.5–5 for Autism: A Meta-Analytic Update [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Justin HAMPTON, Auteur ; Paul S. STRAND, Auteur . - 2015 . - p.2519-2530.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 45-8 (August 2015) . - p.2519-2530
Mots-clés : Autism Autism spectrum disorder Assessment Screening Rating scales Diagnostic validity Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The present study utilized meta-analytic procedures to estimate the diagnostic validity of instruments used to screen young children, ages 1.5–5 years, for autism. Five scales met inclusion criteria, and data from 18 studies contributed the meta-analysis. Results revealed that 4 of 5 scales met criteria for “good” validity, including two broad band scales (instruments not restricted to screening for autism). The current results suggest that validity differences might be a function of how instruments sample across the DSM content domains. Specifically, high validity instruments included a higher proportion of items assessing social interaction skills. The availability of valid broad- and narrow-band instruments, as well as implications for constructing future screening instruments, is discussed. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-015-2419-4 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=263 Sensitivity and Specificity of the ADOS-2 Algorithm in a Large German Sample / J. E. MEDDA in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 49-2 (February 2019)
[article]
Titre : Sensitivity and Specificity of the ADOS-2 Algorithm in a Large German Sample Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : J. E. MEDDA, Auteur ; H. CHOLEMKERY, Auteur ; C. M. FREITAG, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.750-761 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Autism spectrum disorder Child psychiatric disorder Diagnostic validity Psychometric assessment Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The aim of the present study was to establish diagnostic validity of the new algorithm of the Autism Diagnostic Observation Scale, the ADOS-2, to differentiate between ASD and other clinically relevant psychiatric and developmental disorders in a large German sample. Validity of ADOS and ADOS-2 diagnostic algorithms was established in 826 individuals (n = 455 autism, n = 216 autism spectrum, n = 155 non-ASD patients) by receiver operating curves. Confidence intervals overlapped largely for ADOS and ADOS-2 algorithms, confirming diagnostic validity of both algorithms. Adding information of the Social Communication Questionnaire and the Social Responsiveness Scale resulted in slightly improved classification rates for autism in Module 4. We thus replicated previous findings of the diagnostic validity of the ADOS-2 algorithms. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3750-3 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=382
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 49-2 (February 2019) . - p.750-761[article] Sensitivity and Specificity of the ADOS-2 Algorithm in a Large German Sample [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / J. E. MEDDA, Auteur ; H. CHOLEMKERY, Auteur ; C. M. FREITAG, Auteur . - p.750-761.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 49-2 (February 2019) . - p.750-761
Mots-clés : Autism spectrum disorder Child psychiatric disorder Diagnostic validity Psychometric assessment Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The aim of the present study was to establish diagnostic validity of the new algorithm of the Autism Diagnostic Observation Scale, the ADOS-2, to differentiate between ASD and other clinically relevant psychiatric and developmental disorders in a large German sample. Validity of ADOS and ADOS-2 diagnostic algorithms was established in 826 individuals (n = 455 autism, n = 216 autism spectrum, n = 155 non-ASD patients) by receiver operating curves. Confidence intervals overlapped largely for ADOS and ADOS-2 algorithms, confirming diagnostic validity of both algorithms. Adding information of the Social Communication Questionnaire and the Social Responsiveness Scale resulted in slightly improved classification rates for autism in Module 4. We thus replicated previous findings of the diagnostic validity of the ADOS-2 algorithms. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3750-3 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=382