Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Résultat de la recherche
2 recherche sur le mot-clé 'sensory integration therapy'
Affiner la recherche Générer le flux rss de la recherche
Partager le résultat de cette recherche Faire une suggestion
A Comparison of a Behavioral Feeding Intervention With and Without Pre-meal Sensory Integration Therapy / Laura SEIVERLING in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 48-10 (October 2018)
[article]
Titre : A Comparison of a Behavioral Feeding Intervention With and Without Pre-meal Sensory Integration Therapy Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Laura SEIVERLING, Auteur ; Kisha ANDERSON, Auteur ; Christine ROGAN, Auteur ; Christina ALAIMO, Auteur ; Paul ARGOTT, Auteur ; Julio PANORA, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.3344-3353 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Behavioral feeding intervention Sensory integration therapy Food selectivity Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : This study compared a behavioral feeding intervention with and without pre-meal sensory integration therapy (SIT) in two boys with autism spectrum disorder and severe food selectivity. For both participants, child bite and drink consumption and total intake increased to similar levels with corresponding decreases in inappropriate mealtime behavior (IMB) in both conditions. The SIT condition was then discontinued and both participants continued to exhibit high levels of bite and drink consumption with corresponding low levels of IMB during a non-SIT phase. Caregivers of both participants were then trained in the behavioral feeding intervention. Follow-up data were collected for one participant for two months following intervention and showed maintenance of treatment gains over time. Limitations of the current study and directions for future research comparing the effects of behavioral feeding interventions with and without SIT are discussed. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3604-z Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=369
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 48-10 (October 2018) . - p.3344-3353[article] A Comparison of a Behavioral Feeding Intervention With and Without Pre-meal Sensory Integration Therapy [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Laura SEIVERLING, Auteur ; Kisha ANDERSON, Auteur ; Christine ROGAN, Auteur ; Christina ALAIMO, Auteur ; Paul ARGOTT, Auteur ; Julio PANORA, Auteur . - p.3344-3353.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 48-10 (October 2018) . - p.3344-3353
Mots-clés : Behavioral feeding intervention Sensory integration therapy Food selectivity Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : This study compared a behavioral feeding intervention with and without pre-meal sensory integration therapy (SIT) in two boys with autism spectrum disorder and severe food selectivity. For both participants, child bite and drink consumption and total intake increased to similar levels with corresponding decreases in inappropriate mealtime behavior (IMB) in both conditions. The SIT condition was then discontinued and both participants continued to exhibit high levels of bite and drink consumption with corresponding low levels of IMB during a non-SIT phase. Caregivers of both participants were then trained in the behavioral feeding intervention. Follow-up data were collected for one participant for two months following intervention and showed maintenance of treatment gains over time. Limitations of the current study and directions for future research comparing the effects of behavioral feeding interventions with and without SIT are discussed. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3604-z Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=369 A systematic review of sensory processing interventions for children with autism spectrum disorders / Jane CASE-SMITH in Autism, 19-2 (February 2015)
[article]
Titre : A systematic review of sensory processing interventions for children with autism spectrum disorders Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Jane CASE-SMITH, Auteur ; Lindy L. WEAVER, Auteur ; Mary A. FRISTAD, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.133-148 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : sensory integration therapy sensory processing systematic review Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Children with autism spectrum disorders often exhibit co-occurring sensory processing problems and receive interventions that target self-regulation. In current practice, sensory interventions apply different theoretic constructs, focus on different goals, use a variety of sensory modalities, and involve markedly disparate procedures. Previous reviews examined the effects of sensory interventions without acknowledging these inconsistencies. This systematic review examined the research evidence (2000–2012) of two forms of sensory interventions, sensory integration therapy and sensory-based intervention, for children with autism spectrum disorders and concurrent sensory processing problems. A total of 19 studies were reviewed: 5 examined the effects of sensory integration therapy and 14 sensory-based intervention. The studies defined sensory integration therapies as clinic-based interventions that use sensory-rich, child-directed activities to improve a child’s adaptive responses to sensory experiences. Two randomized controlled trials found positive effects for sensory integration therapy on child performance using Goal Attainment Scaling (effect sizes ranging from .72 to 1.62); other studies (Levels III–IV) found positive effects on reducing behaviors linked to sensory problems. Sensory-based interventions are characterized as classroom-based interventions that use single-sensory strategies, for example, weighted vests or therapy balls, to influence a child’s state of arousal. Few positive effects were found in sensory-based intervention studies. Studies of sensory-based interventions suggest that they may not be effective; however, they did not follow recommended protocols or target sensory processing problems. Although small randomized controlled trials resulted in positive effects for sensory integration therapies, additional rigorous trials using manualized protocols for sensory integration therapy are needed to evaluate effects for children with autism spectrum disorders and sensory processing problems. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1362361313517762 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=256
in Autism > 19-2 (February 2015) . - p.133-148[article] A systematic review of sensory processing interventions for children with autism spectrum disorders [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Jane CASE-SMITH, Auteur ; Lindy L. WEAVER, Auteur ; Mary A. FRISTAD, Auteur . - p.133-148.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Autism > 19-2 (February 2015) . - p.133-148
Mots-clés : sensory integration therapy sensory processing systematic review Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Children with autism spectrum disorders often exhibit co-occurring sensory processing problems and receive interventions that target self-regulation. In current practice, sensory interventions apply different theoretic constructs, focus on different goals, use a variety of sensory modalities, and involve markedly disparate procedures. Previous reviews examined the effects of sensory interventions without acknowledging these inconsistencies. This systematic review examined the research evidence (2000–2012) of two forms of sensory interventions, sensory integration therapy and sensory-based intervention, for children with autism spectrum disorders and concurrent sensory processing problems. A total of 19 studies were reviewed: 5 examined the effects of sensory integration therapy and 14 sensory-based intervention. The studies defined sensory integration therapies as clinic-based interventions that use sensory-rich, child-directed activities to improve a child’s adaptive responses to sensory experiences. Two randomized controlled trials found positive effects for sensory integration therapy on child performance using Goal Attainment Scaling (effect sizes ranging from .72 to 1.62); other studies (Levels III–IV) found positive effects on reducing behaviors linked to sensory problems. Sensory-based interventions are characterized as classroom-based interventions that use single-sensory strategies, for example, weighted vests or therapy balls, to influence a child’s state of arousal. Few positive effects were found in sensory-based intervention studies. Studies of sensory-based interventions suggest that they may not be effective; however, they did not follow recommended protocols or target sensory processing problems. Although small randomized controlled trials resulted in positive effects for sensory integration therapies, additional rigorous trials using manualized protocols for sensory integration therapy are needed to evaluate effects for children with autism spectrum disorders and sensory processing problems. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1362361313517762 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=256