
- <Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
- CRA
- Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
Horaires
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexLundi au Vendredi
Contact
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Adresse
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Jon RASBASH |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (2)



Predictors of between-family and within-family variation in parent–child relationships / Thomas G. O'CONNOR in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47-5 (May 2006)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Predictors of between-family and within-family variation in parent–child relationships Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Thomas G. O'CONNOR, Auteur ; Judy DUNN, Auteur ; Jennifer M. JENKINS, Auteur ; Jon RASBASH, Auteur Année de publication : 2006 Article en page(s) : p.498–510 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Parent–child-relationships differential-parenting step families behavior-problems divorce research-design Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background: Previous studies have found that multiple factors are associated with parent–child relationship quality, but have not distinguished potential sources of between-family and within-family variation in parent–child relationship quality.
Methods: Approximately equal numbers of biological (non-stepfamilies), single-mother, stepfather, and complex/stepmother stepfamilies were selected from a large community study in England. The sample comprised 404 children in 171 families. Parent–child warmth/support and conflict/negativity were assessed using questionnaire and interview methods; family socio-demographic data were collected from parent report.
Results: Multilevel model analyses indicated substantial within-family variation in parent–child relationship quality, and greater within-family variation in complex/stepmother families compared to other family types. Within-family variation was largely accounted for by differences in the siblings' biological relatedness to the mother and father and to child-specific factors, notably aggressive behavior.
Conclusions: The findings illustrate how research using multilevel model designs and analytic strategies may enhance our understanding of family process.En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.01527.x Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=735
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 47-5 (May 2006) . - p.498–510[article] Predictors of between-family and within-family variation in parent–child relationships [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Thomas G. O'CONNOR, Auteur ; Judy DUNN, Auteur ; Jennifer M. JENKINS, Auteur ; Jon RASBASH, Auteur . - 2006 . - p.498–510.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 47-5 (May 2006) . - p.498–510
Mots-clés : Parent–child-relationships differential-parenting step families behavior-problems divorce research-design Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background: Previous studies have found that multiple factors are associated with parent–child relationship quality, but have not distinguished potential sources of between-family and within-family variation in parent–child relationship quality.
Methods: Approximately equal numbers of biological (non-stepfamilies), single-mother, stepfather, and complex/stepmother stepfamilies were selected from a large community study in England. The sample comprised 404 children in 171 families. Parent–child warmth/support and conflict/negativity were assessed using questionnaire and interview methods; family socio-demographic data were collected from parent report.
Results: Multilevel model analyses indicated substantial within-family variation in parent–child relationship quality, and greater within-family variation in complex/stepmother families compared to other family types. Within-family variation was largely accounted for by differences in the siblings' biological relatedness to the mother and father and to child-specific factors, notably aggressive behavior.
Conclusions: The findings illustrate how research using multilevel model designs and analytic strategies may enhance our understanding of family process.En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.01527.x Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=735 The role of maternal factors in sibling relationship quality: a multilevel study of multiple dyads per family / Jennifer M. JENKINS in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 53-6 (June 2012)
![]()
[article]
Titre : The role of maternal factors in sibling relationship quality: a multilevel study of multiple dyads per family Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Jennifer M. JENKINS, Auteur ; Jon RASBASH, Auteur ; George LECKIE, Auteur ; Krista GASS, Auteur ; Judy DUNN, Auteur Année de publication : 2012 Article en page(s) : p.622–629 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Siblings maternal depression parent–child relationships research design family factors Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background: Although many children grow up with more than one sibling, we do not yet know if sibling dyads within families show similarities to one another on sibling affection and hostility. In the present study the hypotheses were tested that (a) there will be significant between family variation in change in sibling affection and hostility and (b) this between family variation will be explained by maternal affective climate, operationalized as positive and negative ambient parenting, differential parenting and maternal malaise.
Methods: A general population sample of families with single and multiple sibling dyads were visited twice, 2 years apart. Up to 2 children in a family acted as informants; 253 relationships were rated in 118 families. A cross-classified, multilevel model was fit to separate between-family and within-family variance in sibling relationships while simultaneously controlling for informant and partner influences.
Results: Thirty-seven percent of the variance in change in sibling affection and 32% of the variance in change in sibling hostility was between family variance. The measured maternal affective climate including, maternal malaise and maternal ambient and differential hostility and affection explained between family differences.
Conclusions: Sibling relationship quality clusters in families and is partly explained by maternal affective climate.En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02484.x Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=157
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 53-6 (June 2012) . - p.622–629[article] The role of maternal factors in sibling relationship quality: a multilevel study of multiple dyads per family [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Jennifer M. JENKINS, Auteur ; Jon RASBASH, Auteur ; George LECKIE, Auteur ; Krista GASS, Auteur ; Judy DUNN, Auteur . - 2012 . - p.622–629.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 53-6 (June 2012) . - p.622–629
Mots-clés : Siblings maternal depression parent–child relationships research design family factors Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background: Although many children grow up with more than one sibling, we do not yet know if sibling dyads within families show similarities to one another on sibling affection and hostility. In the present study the hypotheses were tested that (a) there will be significant between family variation in change in sibling affection and hostility and (b) this between family variation will be explained by maternal affective climate, operationalized as positive and negative ambient parenting, differential parenting and maternal malaise.
Methods: A general population sample of families with single and multiple sibling dyads were visited twice, 2 years apart. Up to 2 children in a family acted as informants; 253 relationships were rated in 118 families. A cross-classified, multilevel model was fit to separate between-family and within-family variance in sibling relationships while simultaneously controlling for informant and partner influences.
Results: Thirty-seven percent of the variance in change in sibling affection and 32% of the variance in change in sibling hostility was between family variance. The measured maternal affective climate including, maternal malaise and maternal ambient and differential hostility and affection explained between family differences.
Conclusions: Sibling relationship quality clusters in families and is partly explained by maternal affective climate.En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02484.x Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=157