Lead and Conduct Problems: A Meta-Analysis / David K. MARCUS in Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 39-2 (March-April 2010)  

Public ISBD [article]  inJournal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology > 39-2 (March-April 2010) . - p.234-241 Titre : Lead and Conduct Problems: A Meta-Analysis Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : David K. MARCUS, Auteur ; Jessica J. FULTON, Auteur ; Erin J. CLARKE, Auteur Année de publication : 2010 Article en page(s) : p.234-241 Langues : Anglais (eng) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : This meta-analysis examined the association between conduct problems and lead exposure. Nineteen studies on 8,561 children and adolescents were included. The average r across all 19 studies was .19 (p < .001), which is considered a medium effect size. Studies that assessed lead exposure using hair element analysis yielded considerably larger effect sizes than those that assessed lead exposure using blood, tooth, or bone lead levels. Excluding the 3 hair analysis studies, the average r was .15 (p < .001). The age of the participants did not significantly moderate the relation between lead exposure and conduct problems. Overall, the relation between lead exposure and conduct problems was strikingly similar in magnitude to the relation between lead exposure and decreased IQ. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15374411003591455 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=990 [article] Lead and Conduct Problems: A Meta-Analysis [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / David K. MARCUS, Auteur ; Jessica J. FULTON, Auteur ; Erin J. CLARKE, Auteur . - 2010 . - p.234-241. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology > 39-2 (March-April 2010) . - p.234-241 Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : This meta-analysis examined the association between conduct problems and lead exposure. Nineteen studies on 8,561 children and adolescents were included. The average r across all 19 studies was .19 (p < .001), which is considered a medium effect size. Studies that assessed lead exposure using hair element analysis yielded considerably larger effect sizes than those that assessed lead exposure using blood, tooth, or bone lead levels. Excluding the 3 hair analysis studies, the average r was .15 (p < .001). The age of the participants did not significantly moderate the relation between lead exposure and conduct problems. Overall, the relation between lead exposure and conduct problems was strikingly similar in magnitude to the relation between lead exposure and decreased IQ. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15374411003591455 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=990

---

1 (1 - 1 / 1)