
- <Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
- CRA
- Informations pratiques
		- 
						Adresse
						Centre d'information et de documentation Horaires
 du CRA Rhône-Alpes
 Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
 bât 211
 95, Bd Pinel
 69678 Bron CedexLundi au Vendredi Contact
 9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65 Mail
 Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
 
- 
						Adresse
						
Auteur Thomas J. SCHOFIELD
|  | 
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (2)
 
                
             
            
                
                     
                
             
						
					
						
							 Faire une suggestion  Affiner la recherche
						
					   Faire une suggestion  Affiner la rechercheDisrupting intergenerational continuity in harsh parenting: Self-control and a supportive partner / Thomas J. SCHOFIELD in Development and Psychopathology, 29-4 (October 2017)

Titre : Disrupting intergenerational continuity in harsh parenting: Self-control and a supportive partner Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Thomas J. SCHOFIELD, Auteur ; Rand D. CONGER, Auteur ; Katherine J. CONGER, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.1279-1287 Langues : Anglais (eng) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Abstract Harsh, abusive, and rejecting behavior by parents toward their children is associated with increased risk for many developmental problems for youth. Children raised by harsh parents are also more likely to treat their own children harshly. The present study addresses conditions that would break this intergenerational cycle of harsh parenting. Data come from a three-generation study of a cohort of 290 adolescents (Generation 2 [G2], 52% female) grown to adulthood and their parents (Generation 1 [G1]). During adolescence, observers rated G1 harsh parenting to G2. Several years later observers rated G2 harsh parenting toward their oldest child (Generation 3 [G3]). Several adaptive systems fundamental to human resilience attenuate intergenerational continuity in harshness. G2 parents were relatively less harsh to G3 children (notwithstanding a history of harshness from G1) when G2's romantic partner (a) communicated positively with G2 and (b) had a good relationship with G3, and (c) when G2 was high on self-control. Interventions that target all of these protective factors may not only break but also reverse the intergenerational cycle of child maltreatment. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954579416001309 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=312 
in Development and Psychopathology > 29-4 (October 2017) . - p.1279-1287[article] Disrupting intergenerational continuity in harsh parenting: Self-control and a supportive partner [texte imprimé] / Thomas J. SCHOFIELD, Auteur ; Rand D. CONGER, Auteur ; Katherine J. CONGER, Auteur . - p.1279-1287.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Development and Psychopathology > 29-4 (October 2017) . - p.1279-1287
Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Abstract Harsh, abusive, and rejecting behavior by parents toward their children is associated with increased risk for many developmental problems for youth. Children raised by harsh parents are also more likely to treat their own children harshly. The present study addresses conditions that would break this intergenerational cycle of harsh parenting. Data come from a three-generation study of a cohort of 290 adolescents (Generation 2 [G2], 52% female) grown to adulthood and their parents (Generation 1 [G1]). During adolescence, observers rated G1 harsh parenting to G2. Several years later observers rated G2 harsh parenting toward their oldest child (Generation 3 [G3]). Several adaptive systems fundamental to human resilience attenuate intergenerational continuity in harshness. G2 parents were relatively less harsh to G3 children (notwithstanding a history of harshness from G1) when G2's romantic partner (a) communicated positively with G2 and (b) had a good relationship with G3, and (c) when G2 was high on self-control. Interventions that target all of these protective factors may not only break but also reverse the intergenerational cycle of child maltreatment. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954579416001309 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=312 Evaluation of the interactionist model of socioeconomic status and problem behavior: A developmental cascade across generations / Monica J. MARTIN in Development and Psychopathology, 22-3 (August 2010)

Titre : Evaluation of the interactionist model of socioeconomic status and problem behavior: A developmental cascade across generations Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Monica J. MARTIN, Auteur ; Rand D. CONGER, Auteur ; Thomas J. SCHOFIELD, Auteur ; Shannon J. DOGAN, Auteur ; Keith F. WIDAMAN, Auteur ; M. Brent DONNELLAN, Auteur ; Tricia K. NEPPL, Auteur Année de publication : 2010 Article en page(s) : p.695-713 Langues : Anglais (eng) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The current multigenerational study evaluates the utility of the interactionist model of socioeconomic influence on human development (IMSI) in explaining problem behaviors across generations. The IMSI proposes that the association between socioeconomic status (SES) and human development involves a dynamic interplay that includes both social causation (SES influences human development) and social selection (individual characteristics affect SES). As part of the developmental cascade proposed by the IMSI, the findings from this investigation showed that Generation 1 (G1) adolescent problem behavior predicted later G1 SES, family stress, and parental emotional investments, as well as the next generation of children's problem behavior. These results are consistent with a social selection view. Consistent with the social causation perspective, we found a significant relation between G1 SES and family stress, and in turn, family stress predicted Generation 2 (G2) problem behavior. Finally, G1 adult SES predicted both material and emotional investments in the G2 child. In turn, emotional investments predicted G2 problem behavior, as did material investments. Some of the predicted pathways varied by G1 parent gender. The results are consistent with the view that processes of both social selection and social causation account for the association between SES and human development. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954579410000374 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=108 
in Development and Psychopathology > 22-3 (August 2010) . - p.695-713[article] Evaluation of the interactionist model of socioeconomic status and problem behavior: A developmental cascade across generations [texte imprimé] / Monica J. MARTIN, Auteur ; Rand D. CONGER, Auteur ; Thomas J. SCHOFIELD, Auteur ; Shannon J. DOGAN, Auteur ; Keith F. WIDAMAN, Auteur ; M. Brent DONNELLAN, Auteur ; Tricia K. NEPPL, Auteur . - 2010 . - p.695-713.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Development and Psychopathology > 22-3 (August 2010) . - p.695-713
Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The current multigenerational study evaluates the utility of the interactionist model of socioeconomic influence on human development (IMSI) in explaining problem behaviors across generations. The IMSI proposes that the association between socioeconomic status (SES) and human development involves a dynamic interplay that includes both social causation (SES influences human development) and social selection (individual characteristics affect SES). As part of the developmental cascade proposed by the IMSI, the findings from this investigation showed that Generation 1 (G1) adolescent problem behavior predicted later G1 SES, family stress, and parental emotional investments, as well as the next generation of children's problem behavior. These results are consistent with a social selection view. Consistent with the social causation perspective, we found a significant relation between G1 SES and family stress, and in turn, family stress predicted Generation 2 (G2) problem behavior. Finally, G1 adult SES predicted both material and emotional investments in the G2 child. In turn, emotional investments predicted G2 problem behavior, as did material investments. Some of the predicted pathways varied by G1 parent gender. The results are consistent with the view that processes of both social selection and social causation account for the association between SES and human development. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954579410000374 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=108 

