Evaluation of the interactionist model of socioeconomic status and problem behavior: A developmental cascade across generations / Monica J. MARTIN in Development and Psychopathology, 22-3 (August 2010)  

Public ISBD [article]  inDevelopment and Psychopathology > 22-3 (August 2010) . - p.695-713 Titre : Evaluation of the interactionist model of socioeconomic status and problem behavior: A developmental cascade across generations Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Monica J. MARTIN, Auteur ; Rand D. CONGER, Auteur ; Thomas J. SCHOFIELD, Auteur ; Shannon J. DOGAN, Auteur ; Keith F. WIDAMAN, Auteur ; M. Brent DONNELLAN, Auteur ; Tricia K. NEPPL, Auteur Année de publication : 2010 Article en page(s) : p.695-713 Langues : Anglais (eng) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The current multigenerational study evaluates the utility of the interactionist model of socioeconomic influence on human development (IMSI) in explaining problem behaviors across generations. The IMSI proposes that the association between socioeconomic status (SES) and human development involves a dynamic interplay that includes both social causation (SES influences human development) and social selection (individual characteristics affect SES). As part of the developmental cascade proposed by the IMSI, the findings from this investigation showed that Generation 1 (G1) adolescent problem behavior predicted later G1 SES, family stress, and parental emotional investments, as well as the next generation of children's problem behavior. These results are consistent with a social selection view. Consistent with the social causation perspective, we found a significant relation between G1 SES and family stress, and in turn, family stress predicted Generation 2 (G2) problem behavior. Finally, G1 adult SES predicted both material and emotional investments in the G2 child. In turn, emotional investments predicted G2 problem behavior, as did material investments. Some of the predicted pathways varied by G1 parent gender. The results are consistent with the view that processes of both social selection and social causation account for the association between SES and human development. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954579410000374 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=108 [article] Evaluation of the interactionist model of socioeconomic status and problem behavior: A developmental cascade across generations [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Monica J. MARTIN, Auteur ; Rand D. CONGER, Auteur ; Thomas J. SCHOFIELD, Auteur ; Shannon J. DOGAN, Auteur ; Keith F. WIDAMAN, Auteur ; M. Brent DONNELLAN, Auteur ; Tricia K. NEPPL, Auteur . - 2010 . - p.695-713. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Development and Psychopathology > 22-3 (August 2010) . - p.695-713 Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The current multigenerational study evaluates the utility of the interactionist model of socioeconomic influence on human development (IMSI) in explaining problem behaviors across generations. The IMSI proposes that the association between socioeconomic status (SES) and human development involves a dynamic interplay that includes both social causation (SES influences human development) and social selection (individual characteristics affect SES). As part of the developmental cascade proposed by the IMSI, the findings from this investigation showed that Generation 1 (G1) adolescent problem behavior predicted later G1 SES, family stress, and parental emotional investments, as well as the next generation of children's problem behavior. These results are consistent with a social selection view. Consistent with the social causation perspective, we found a significant relation between G1 SES and family stress, and in turn, family stress predicted Generation 2 (G2) problem behavior. Finally, G1 adult SES predicted both material and emotional investments in the G2 child. In turn, emotional investments predicted G2 problem behavior, as did material investments. Some of the predicted pathways varied by G1 parent gender. The results are consistent with the view that processes of both social selection and social causation account for the association between SES and human development. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954579410000374 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=108

Parenting and adolescents’ psychological adjustment: Longitudinal moderation by adolescents’ genetic sensitivity / Clare M. STOCKER in Development and Psychopathology, 29-4 (October 2017)  

Public ISBD [article]  inDevelopment and Psychopathology > 29-4 (October 2017) . - p.1289-1304 Titre : Parenting and adolescents’ psychological adjustment: Longitudinal moderation by adolescents’ genetic sensitivity Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Clare M. STOCKER, Auteur ; April S. MASARIK, Auteur ; Keith F. WIDAMAN, Auteur ; Ben T. REEB, Auteur ; Jason D. BOARDMAN, Auteur ; Andrew SMOLEN, Auteur ; Tricia K. NEPPL, Auteur ; Katherine J. CONGER, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.1289-1304 Langues : Anglais (eng) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Abstract We examined whether adolescents’ genetic sensitivity, measured by a polygenic index score, moderated the longitudinal associations between parenting and adolescents’ psychological adjustment. The sample included 323 mothers, fathers, and adolescents (177 female, 146 male; Time 1 [T1] average age = 12.61 years, SD = 0.54 years; Time 2 [T2] average age = 13.59 years, SD = 0.59 years). Parents’ warmth and hostility were rated by trained, independent observers using videotapes of family discussions. Adolescents reported their symptoms of anxiety, depressed mood, and hostility at T1 and T2. The results from autoregressive linear regression models showed that adolescents’ genetic sensitivity moderated associations between observations of both mothers’ and fathers’ T1 parenting and adolescents’ T2 composite maladjustment, depression, anxiety, and hostility. Compared to adolescents with low genetic sensitivity, adolescents with high genetic sensitivity had worse adjustment outcomes when parenting was low on warmth and high on hostility. When parenting was characterized by high warmth and low hostility, adolescents with high genetic sensitivity had better adjustment outcomes than their counterparts with low genetic sensitivity. The results support the differential susceptibility model and highlight the complex ways that genes and environment interact to influence development. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954579416001310 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=312 [article] Parenting and adolescents’ psychological adjustment: Longitudinal moderation by adolescents’ genetic sensitivity [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Clare M. STOCKER, Auteur ; April S. MASARIK, Auteur ; Keith F. WIDAMAN, Auteur ; Ben T. REEB, Auteur ; Jason D. BOARDMAN, Auteur ; Andrew SMOLEN, Auteur ; Tricia K. NEPPL, Auteur ; Katherine J. CONGER, Auteur . - p.1289-1304. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Development and Psychopathology > 29-4 (October 2017) . - p.1289-1304 Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Abstract We examined whether adolescents’ genetic sensitivity, measured by a polygenic index score, moderated the longitudinal associations between parenting and adolescents’ psychological adjustment. The sample included 323 mothers, fathers, and adolescents (177 female, 146 male; Time 1 [T1] average age = 12.61 years, SD = 0.54 years; Time 2 [T2] average age = 13.59 years, SD = 0.59 years). Parents’ warmth and hostility were rated by trained, independent observers using videotapes of family discussions. Adolescents reported their symptoms of anxiety, depressed mood, and hostility at T1 and T2. The results from autoregressive linear regression models showed that adolescents’ genetic sensitivity moderated associations between observations of both mothers’ and fathers’ T1 parenting and adolescents’ T2 composite maladjustment, depression, anxiety, and hostility. Compared to adolescents with low genetic sensitivity, adolescents with high genetic sensitivity had worse adjustment outcomes when parenting was low on warmth and high on hostility. When parenting was characterized by high warmth and low hostility, adolescents with high genetic sensitivity had better adjustment outcomes than their counterparts with low genetic sensitivity. The results support the differential susceptibility model and highlight the complex ways that genes and environment interact to influence development. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954579416001310 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=312

---

1 (1 - 2 / 2)