Symptom differentiation of anxiety and depression across youth development and clinic-referred/nonreferred samples: An examination of competing factor structures of the Child Behavior Checklist DSM-oriented scales / Maggi PRICE in Development and Psychopathology, 25-4 (November 2013)  

Public ISBD [article]  inDevelopment and Psychopathology > 25-4 (November 2013) . - p.1005-1015 Titre : Symptom differentiation of anxiety and depression across youth development and clinic-referred/nonreferred samples: An examination of competing factor structures of the Child Behavior Checklist DSM-oriented scales Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Maggi PRICE, Auteur ; Charmaine HIGA-MCMILLAN, Auteur ; Chad EBESUTANI, Auteur ; Kelsie OKAMURA, Auteur ; Brad J. NAKAMURA, Auteur ; Bruce F. CHORPITA, Auteur ; John R. WEISZ, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.1005-1015 Langues : Anglais (eng) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : This study examined the psychometric properties of the DSM-oriented scales of the Child Behavior Checklist (Achenbach, Dumenci, Rescorla, 2003) using confirmatory factor analysis to compare the six-factor structure of the DSM-oriented scales to competing models consistent with developmental theories of symptom differentiation. We tested these models on both clinic-referred (N = 757) and school-based, nonreferred (N = 713) samples of youths in order to assess the generalizability of the factorial structures. Although previous research has supported the fit of the six-factor DSM-oriented structure in a normative sample of youths ages 7 to 18 (Achenbach Rescorla, 2001), tripartite model research indicates that anxiety and depressive symptomology are less differentiated among children compared to adolescents (Jacques Mash, 2004). We thus examined the relative fit of a six- and a five-factor model (collapsing anxiety and depression) with younger (ages 7–10) and older (ages 11–18) youth subsamples. The results revealed that the six-factor model fit the best in all samples except among younger nonclinical children. The results extended the generalizability of the rationally derived six-factor structure of the DSM-oriented scales to clinic-referred youths and provided further support to the notion that younger children in nonclinical samples exhibit less differentiated symptoms of anxiety and depression. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579413000333 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=219 [article] Symptom differentiation of anxiety and depression across youth development and clinic-referred/nonreferred samples: An examination of competing factor structures of the Child Behavior Checklist DSM-oriented scales [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Maggi PRICE, Auteur ; Charmaine HIGA-MCMILLAN, Auteur ; Chad EBESUTANI, Auteur ; Kelsie OKAMURA, Auteur ; Brad J. NAKAMURA, Auteur ; Bruce F. CHORPITA, Auteur ; John R. WEISZ, Auteur . - p.1005-1015. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Development and Psychopathology > 25-4 (November 2013) . - p.1005-1015 Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : This study examined the psychometric properties of the DSM-oriented scales of the Child Behavior Checklist (Achenbach, Dumenci, Rescorla, 2003) using confirmatory factor analysis to compare the six-factor structure of the DSM-oriented scales to competing models consistent with developmental theories of symptom differentiation. We tested these models on both clinic-referred (N = 757) and school-based, nonreferred (N = 713) samples of youths in order to assess the generalizability of the factorial structures. Although previous research has supported the fit of the six-factor DSM-oriented structure in a normative sample of youths ages 7 to 18 (Achenbach Rescorla, 2001), tripartite model research indicates that anxiety and depressive symptomology are less differentiated among children compared to adolescents (Jacques Mash, 2004). We thus examined the relative fit of a six- and a five-factor model (collapsing anxiety and depression) with younger (ages 7–10) and older (ages 11–18) youth subsamples. The results revealed that the six-factor model fit the best in all samples except among younger nonclinical children. The results extended the generalizability of the rationally derived six-factor structure of the DSM-oriented scales to clinic-referred youths and provided further support to the notion that younger children in nonclinical samples exhibit less differentiated symptoms of anxiety and depression. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579413000333 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=219

The Youth Self Report: Applicability and Validity Across Younger and Older Youths / Chad EBESUTANI in Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 40-2 (March-April 2011)  

Public ISBD [article]  inJournal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology > 40-2 (March-April 2011) . - p.338-346 Titre : The Youth Self Report: Applicability and Validity Across Younger and Older Youths Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Chad EBESUTANI, Auteur ; Adam BERNSTEIN, Auteur ; Jonathan I. MARTINEZ, Auteur ; Bruce F. CHORPITA, Auteur ; John R. WEISZ, Auteur Année de publication : 2011 Article en page(s) : p.338-346 Langues : Anglais (eng) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The Youth Self Report (YSR) is a widely used measure of youth emotional and behavioral problems. Although the YSR was designed for youths ages 11 to 18, no studies have systematically evaluated whether youths younger than age 11 can make valid reports on this measure. This study thus examined the reliability and validity of the YSR scales scores for younger (ages 7-10; n = 184) and older (ages 11-14; n = 147) youths. Results demonstrated that younger youths were able to provide reliable reports on the YSR broad band (Internalizing, Externalizing) scales, though less so on the narrow band scales. Across all scales, the externalizing scales performed more favorably than the internalizing scales among both younger and older youth. Younger youths' DSM-oriented scales corresponded significantly with DSM diagnoses. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2011.546041 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=119 [article] The Youth Self Report: Applicability and Validity Across Younger and Older Youths [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Chad EBESUTANI, Auteur ; Adam BERNSTEIN, Auteur ; Jonathan I. MARTINEZ, Auteur ; Bruce F. CHORPITA, Auteur ; John R. WEISZ, Auteur . - 2011 . - p.338-346. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology > 40-2 (March-April 2011) . - p.338-346 Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The Youth Self Report (YSR) is a widely used measure of youth emotional and behavioral problems. Although the YSR was designed for youths ages 11 to 18, no studies have systematically evaluated whether youths younger than age 11 can make valid reports on this measure. This study thus examined the reliability and validity of the YSR scales scores for younger (ages 7-10; n = 184) and older (ages 11-14; n = 147) youths. Results demonstrated that younger youths were able to provide reliable reports on the YSR broad band (Internalizing, Externalizing) scales, though less so on the narrow band scales. Across all scales, the externalizing scales performed more favorably than the internalizing scales among both younger and older youth. Younger youths' DSM-oriented scales corresponded significantly with DSM diagnoses. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2011.546041 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=119

---

1 (1 - 2 / 2)