[article]
| Titre : |
Brief Report: Comparability of DSM-IV and DSM-5 ASD Research Samples |
| Type de document : |
Texte imprimé et/ou numérique |
| Auteurs : |
Carla A. MAZEFSKY, Auteur ; James C. MCPARTLAND, Auteur ; H. Z. GASTGEB, Auteur ; Nancy J. MINSHEW, Auteur |
| Article en page(s) : |
p.1236-1242 |
| Langues : |
Anglais (eng) |
| Mots-clés : |
Autism Diagnosis Assessment DSM-5 Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS) Autism Diagnostic Interview (ADI) |
| Index. décimale : |
PER Périodiques |
| Résumé : |
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-5) criteria for ASD have been criticized for being too restrictive, especially for more cognitively-able individuals. It is unclear, however, if high-functioning individuals deemed eligible for research via standardized diagnostic assessments would meet DSM-5 criteria. This study investigated the impact of DSM-5 on the diagnostic status of 498 high-functioning participants with ASD research diagnoses. The percent of participants satisfying all DSM-5-requirements varied significantly with reliance on data from the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS; 33 %) versus Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R; 83 %), highlighting the impact of diagnostic methodology on ability to document DSM-5 symptoms. Utilizing combined ADOS/ADI-R data, 93 % of participants met DSM-5 criteria, which suggests likely continuity between DSM-IV and DSM-5 research samples characterized with these instruments in combination. |
| En ligne : |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-012-1665-y |
| Permalink : |
https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=195 |
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 43-5 (May 2013) . - p.1236-1242
[article] Brief Report: Comparability of DSM-IV and DSM-5 ASD Research Samples [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Carla A. MAZEFSKY, Auteur ; James C. MCPARTLAND, Auteur ; H. Z. GASTGEB, Auteur ; Nancy J. MINSHEW, Auteur . - p.1236-1242. Langues : Anglais ( eng) in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 43-5 (May 2013) . - p.1236-1242
| Mots-clés : |
Autism Diagnosis Assessment DSM-5 Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS) Autism Diagnostic Interview (ADI) |
| Index. décimale : |
PER Périodiques |
| Résumé : |
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-5) criteria for ASD have been criticized for being too restrictive, especially for more cognitively-able individuals. It is unclear, however, if high-functioning individuals deemed eligible for research via standardized diagnostic assessments would meet DSM-5 criteria. This study investigated the impact of DSM-5 on the diagnostic status of 498 high-functioning participants with ASD research diagnoses. The percent of participants satisfying all DSM-5-requirements varied significantly with reliance on data from the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS; 33 %) versus Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R; 83 %), highlighting the impact of diagnostic methodology on ability to document DSM-5 symptoms. Utilizing combined ADOS/ADI-R data, 93 % of participants met DSM-5 criteria, which suggests likely continuity between DSM-IV and DSM-5 research samples characterized with these instruments in combination. |
| En ligne : |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-012-1665-y |
| Permalink : |
https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=195 |
|
Brief Report: Comparability of DSM-IV and DSM-5 ASD Research Samples in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43-5 (May 2013)
