
- <Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
- CRA
- Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
Horaires
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexLundi au Vendredi
Contact
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Adresse
Auteur Suzet Tanya LEREYA
|
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (2)



Cumulative risk and adolescent emotional distress: A longitudinal moderated mediation analysis focusing on perceived stress and social support / Neil HUMPHREY ; Ola DEMKOWICZ ; Suzet Tanya LEREYA ; Jessica DEIGHTON in Development and Psychopathology, 37-4 (October 2025)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Cumulative risk and adolescent emotional distress: A longitudinal moderated mediation analysis focusing on perceived stress and social support Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Neil HUMPHREY, Auteur ; Ola DEMKOWICZ, Auteur ; Suzet Tanya LEREYA, Auteur ; Jessica DEIGHTON, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.1695-1706 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Adolescence cumulative risk exposure emotional distress perceived stress social support Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : This study provides insights into the roles played by perceived stress and social support in the relationship between cumulative risk exposure (CRE) and adolescent emotional distress. Preregistered longitudinal moderated mediation analyses were used to test hypotheses relating to the association between CRE and later emotional distress; the mediating role of perceived stress in the relationship between CRE and later emotional distress; and, the moderating effects of peer and adult-level family support on the relationship between CRE and later perceived stress, among N = 19,159 adolescents over three annual waves (at ages 11/12, 12/13, 13/14). Analyses revealed that CRE significantly predicted later adolescent emotional distress. This relationship was partially mediated by perceived stress. Both peer and adult-level family support significantly moderated the impact of CRE on later perceived stress (i.e., adolescents reporting higher levels of support perceived significantly lower levels of stress resulting from CRE compared to those reporting lower levels of support). These findings provide critical empirical evidence of the roles played by perceived stress and social support in the relationship between CRE and adolescent emotional distress, with consequent implications for intervention. En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579424001275 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=567
in Development and Psychopathology > 37-4 (October 2025) . - p.1695-1706[article] Cumulative risk and adolescent emotional distress: A longitudinal moderated mediation analysis focusing on perceived stress and social support [texte imprimé] / Neil HUMPHREY, Auteur ; Ola DEMKOWICZ, Auteur ; Suzet Tanya LEREYA, Auteur ; Jessica DEIGHTON, Auteur . - p.1695-1706.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Development and Psychopathology > 37-4 (October 2025) . - p.1695-1706
Mots-clés : Adolescence cumulative risk exposure emotional distress perceived stress social support Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : This study provides insights into the roles played by perceived stress and social support in the relationship between cumulative risk exposure (CRE) and adolescent emotional distress. Preregistered longitudinal moderated mediation analyses were used to test hypotheses relating to the association between CRE and later emotional distress; the mediating role of perceived stress in the relationship between CRE and later emotional distress; and, the moderating effects of peer and adult-level family support on the relationship between CRE and later perceived stress, among N = 19,159 adolescents over three annual waves (at ages 11/12, 12/13, 13/14). Analyses revealed that CRE significantly predicted later adolescent emotional distress. This relationship was partially mediated by perceived stress. Both peer and adult-level family support significantly moderated the impact of CRE on later perceived stress (i.e., adolescents reporting higher levels of support perceived significantly lower levels of stress resulting from CRE compared to those reporting lower levels of support). These findings provide critical empirical evidence of the roles played by perceived stress and social support in the relationship between CRE and adolescent emotional distress, with consequent implications for intervention. En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579424001275 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=567 Prenatal family adversity and maternal mental health and vulnerability to peer victimisation at school / Suzet Tanya LEREYA in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 54-6 (June 2013)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Prenatal family adversity and maternal mental health and vulnerability to peer victimisation at school Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Suzet Tanya LEREYA, Auteur ; Dieter WOLKE, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.644-652 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Bullying victimisation anxiety depression prenatal parenting ALSPAC Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background: Prenatal stress has been shown to predict persistent behavioural abnormalities in offspring. Unknown is whether prenatal stress makes children more vulnerable to peer victimisation. Methods: The current study is based on the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children, a prospective community-based study. Family adversity, maternal anxiety and depression were assessed at repeated intervals in pregnancy and the postnatal period. Parenting, partner conflict and temperament were measured at preschool age. Peer victimisation was assessed using multiple informants (child, parent, teacher) at primary school age (between ages 7 and 10). Results: Prenatal severe family adversity and maternal mental health directly increased the risk of victimisation at school even when controlled for postnatal family adversity and maternal mental health, parenting, partner conflict and temperament. Effects were found to be independent of sources of information of peer victimisation. Partner conflict and maladaptive parenting also independently increased the risk of peer victimisation. Conclusions: Experiences in pregnancy may affect the developing foetus and increase vulnerability to be victimised by peers. Conflict between parents and their parenting further increase the risk of being victimised by peers at school. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12012 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=200
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 54-6 (June 2013) . - p.644-652[article] Prenatal family adversity and maternal mental health and vulnerability to peer victimisation at school [texte imprimé] / Suzet Tanya LEREYA, Auteur ; Dieter WOLKE, Auteur . - p.644-652.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 54-6 (June 2013) . - p.644-652
Mots-clés : Bullying victimisation anxiety depression prenatal parenting ALSPAC Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background: Prenatal stress has been shown to predict persistent behavioural abnormalities in offspring. Unknown is whether prenatal stress makes children more vulnerable to peer victimisation. Methods: The current study is based on the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children, a prospective community-based study. Family adversity, maternal anxiety and depression were assessed at repeated intervals in pregnancy and the postnatal period. Parenting, partner conflict and temperament were measured at preschool age. Peer victimisation was assessed using multiple informants (child, parent, teacher) at primary school age (between ages 7 and 10). Results: Prenatal severe family adversity and maternal mental health directly increased the risk of victimisation at school even when controlled for postnatal family adversity and maternal mental health, parenting, partner conflict and temperament. Effects were found to be independent of sources of information of peer victimisation. Partner conflict and maladaptive parenting also independently increased the risk of peer victimisation. Conclusions: Experiences in pregnancy may affect the developing foetus and increase vulnerability to be victimised by peers. Conflict between parents and their parenting further increase the risk of being victimised by peers at school. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12012 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=200