
- <Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
- CRA
- Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
Horaires
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexLundi au Vendredi
Contact
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Adresse
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Emily SARTINI |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (4)



A Comprehensive Literature Review of Comprehension Strategies in Core Content Areas for Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder / Victoria F. KNIGHT in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45-5 (May 2015)
![]()
[article]
Titre : A Comprehensive Literature Review of Comprehension Strategies in Core Content Areas for Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Victoria F. KNIGHT, Auteur ; Emily SARTINI, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.1213-1229 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Autism spectrum disorder Evidence-based practice Content areas Comprehension Math ELA Science Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Understanding text can increase access to educational, vocational, and recreational activities for individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD); however, limited research has been conducted investigating instructional practices to remediate or compensate for these comprehension challenges. The current comprehensive literature review expanded previous reviews and evaluated research quality using Reichow (Evidence-based practices and treatments for children with autism, pp 25–39. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-6975-0_2, 2011) criteria for identifying evidence-based practices. Three questions guided the review: (a) Which approaches to comprehension instruction have been investigated for students with ASD?; (b) Have there been a sufficient number of acceptable studies using a particular strategy to qualify as an evidence-based practice for teaching comprehension across the content areas?; and (c) What can educators learn from the analysis of high quality studies? Of the 23 studies included in the review, only 13 achieved high or adequate ratings. Results of the review suggest that both response-prompting procedures (e.g., model-lead-test, time delay, system of least prompts,) and visual supports (e.g., procedural facilitators) can increase comprehension skills in content areas of ELA, math, and science. Authors conclude with a discussion of (a) research-based examples of how to use effective approaches, (b) implications for practitioners, and (c) limitations and future research. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-014-2280-x Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=259
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 45-5 (May 2015) . - p.1213-1229[article] A Comprehensive Literature Review of Comprehension Strategies in Core Content Areas for Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Victoria F. KNIGHT, Auteur ; Emily SARTINI, Auteur . - p.1213-1229.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 45-5 (May 2015) . - p.1213-1229
Mots-clés : Autism spectrum disorder Evidence-based practice Content areas Comprehension Math ELA Science Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Understanding text can increase access to educational, vocational, and recreational activities for individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD); however, limited research has been conducted investigating instructional practices to remediate or compensate for these comprehension challenges. The current comprehensive literature review expanded previous reviews and evaluated research quality using Reichow (Evidence-based practices and treatments for children with autism, pp 25–39. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-6975-0_2, 2011) criteria for identifying evidence-based practices. Three questions guided the review: (a) Which approaches to comprehension instruction have been investigated for students with ASD?; (b) Have there been a sufficient number of acceptable studies using a particular strategy to qualify as an evidence-based practice for teaching comprehension across the content areas?; and (c) What can educators learn from the analysis of high quality studies? Of the 23 studies included in the review, only 13 achieved high or adequate ratings. Results of the review suggest that both response-prompting procedures (e.g., model-lead-test, time delay, system of least prompts,) and visual supports (e.g., procedural facilitators) can increase comprehension skills in content areas of ELA, math, and science. Authors conclude with a discussion of (a) research-based examples of how to use effective approaches, (b) implications for practitioners, and (c) limitations and future research. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-014-2280-x Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=259 Evaluating Visual Activity Schedules as Evidence-Based Practice for Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders / Victoria KNIGHT in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45-1 (January 2015)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Evaluating Visual Activity Schedules as Evidence-Based Practice for Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Victoria KNIGHT, Auteur ; Emily SARTINI, Auteur ; Amy D. SPRIGGS, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.157-178 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Visual activity schedules Evidence-based practices Autism spectrum disorder Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted for articles published between 1993 and 2013 to evaluate the quality of the Visual Activity Schedules (VAS) literature using current evidence-based criteria developed by Horner et al. (Except Child 71:165–179, 2005). Authors sought to determine whether VAS can be considered an evidence-based practice by expanding on the findings from previous reviews. A total of 31 studies met inclusion criteria for the use of VAS to various behaviors to students with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Of these studies, 16 met criteria for acceptable quality. Results suggest that VAS can be considered an EBP for individuals with ASD, especially when used in combination with systematic instructional procedures. VAS can be used to increase, maintain, and generalize a range of skills of individuals from preschool through adulthood in a variety of settings (e.g., general education, community). Implications for practitioners using VAS, limitations, and recommendations for future research are discussed. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-014-2201-z Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=258
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 45-1 (January 2015) . - p.157-178[article] Evaluating Visual Activity Schedules as Evidence-Based Practice for Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Victoria KNIGHT, Auteur ; Emily SARTINI, Auteur ; Amy D. SPRIGGS, Auteur . - p.157-178.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 45-1 (January 2015) . - p.157-178
Mots-clés : Visual activity schedules Evidence-based practices Autism spectrum disorder Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted for articles published between 1993 and 2013 to evaluate the quality of the Visual Activity Schedules (VAS) literature using current evidence-based criteria developed by Horner et al. (Except Child 71:165–179, 2005). Authors sought to determine whether VAS can be considered an evidence-based practice by expanding on the findings from previous reviews. A total of 31 studies met inclusion criteria for the use of VAS to various behaviors to students with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Of these studies, 16 met criteria for acceptable quality. Results suggest that VAS can be considered an EBP for individuals with ASD, especially when used in combination with systematic instructional procedures. VAS can be used to increase, maintain, and generalize a range of skills of individuals from preschool through adulthood in a variety of settings (e.g., general education, community). Implications for practitioners using VAS, limitations, and recommendations for future research are discussed. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-014-2201-z Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=258 Generalization Strategies to Promote Text Comprehension Skills by Students With ASD in Core Content Areas / Emily SARTINI in Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 33-3 (September 2018)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Generalization Strategies to Promote Text Comprehension Skills by Students With ASD in Core Content Areas Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Emily SARTINI, Auteur ; Victoria F. KNIGHT, Auteur ; Amy D. SPRIGGS, Auteur ; R. Allan ALLDAY, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.150-159 Langues : Anglais (eng) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : As increasing literature emerges to address text comprehension deficits for students with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), educators often struggle to design interventions resulting in successful generalization of comprehension skills. This evaluative review of literature explored the inclusion of and methods used in generalization of text comprehension research for students with ASD. Authors examined 32 studies across content areas (e.g., English language arts [ELA], math, science) to investigate the following questions: (a) To what extent is generalization addressed across content areas for students with ASD? (b) How did the studies program for generalization? (c) What conclusions can be inferred about effective generalization methods? and (d) Can quality indicators be recommended for generalization methods for text comprehension? Recommendations for quality indicators for generalization measures and strategies are suggested based on the findings from the current review. Implications for future research and instructional practice are also discussed. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357617735815 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=367
in Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities > 33-3 (September 2018) . - p.150-159[article] Generalization Strategies to Promote Text Comprehension Skills by Students With ASD in Core Content Areas [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Emily SARTINI, Auteur ; Victoria F. KNIGHT, Auteur ; Amy D. SPRIGGS, Auteur ; R. Allan ALLDAY, Auteur . - p.150-159.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities > 33-3 (September 2018) . - p.150-159
Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : As increasing literature emerges to address text comprehension deficits for students with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), educators often struggle to design interventions resulting in successful generalization of comprehension skills. This evaluative review of literature explored the inclusion of and methods used in generalization of text comprehension research for students with ASD. Authors examined 32 studies across content areas (e.g., English language arts [ELA], math, science) to investigate the following questions: (a) To what extent is generalization addressed across content areas for students with ASD? (b) How did the studies program for generalization? (c) What conclusions can be inferred about effective generalization methods? and (d) Can quality indicators be recommended for generalization methods for text comprehension? Recommendations for quality indicators for generalization measures and strategies are suggested based on the findings from the current review. Implications for future research and instructional practice are also discussed. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357617735815 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=367 Modifying a naturalistic language intervention for use in an elementary school classroom / Justin D LANE in Autism & Developmental Language Impairments, 5 (January-December 2020)
![]()