Adolescent Judgments and Reasoning About the Failure to Include Peers with Social Disabilities / Kristen BOTTEMA-BEUTEL in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45-6 (June 2015)  

Public ISBD [article]  inJournal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 45-6 (June 2015) . - p.1873-1886 Titre : Adolescent Judgments and Reasoning About the Failure to Include Peers with Social Disabilities Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Kristen BOTTEMA-BEUTEL, Auteur ; Zhushan LI, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.1873-1886 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Autism spectrum disorder  Inclusion  Moral reasoning  Domain theory  Adolescents Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Adolescents with autism spectrum disorder often do not have access to crucial peer social activities. This study examines how typically developing adolescents evaluate decisions not to include a peer based on disability status, and the justifications they apply to these decisions. A clinical interview methodology was used to elicit judgments and justifications across four contexts. We found adolescents are more likely to judge the failure to include as acceptable in personal as compared to public contexts. Using logistic regression, we found that adolescents are more likely to provide moral justifications as to why failure to include is acceptable in a classroom as compared to home, lab group, and soccer practice contexts. Implications for intervention are also discussed. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-014-2348-7 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=259 [article] Adolescent Judgments and Reasoning About the Failure to Include Peers with Social Disabilities [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Kristen BOTTEMA-BEUTEL, Auteur ; Zhushan LI, Auteur . - p.1873-1886. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 45-6 (June 2015) . - p.1873-1886 Mots-clés : Autism spectrum disorder  Inclusion  Moral reasoning  Domain theory  Adolescents Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Adolescents with autism spectrum disorder often do not have access to crucial peer social activities. This study examines how typically developing adolescents evaluate decisions not to include a peer based on disability status, and the justifications they apply to these decisions. A clinical interview methodology was used to elicit judgments and justifications across four contexts. We found adolescents are more likely to judge the failure to include as acceptable in personal as compared to public contexts. Using logistic regression, we found that adolescents are more likely to provide moral justifications as to why failure to include is acceptable in a classroom as compared to home, lab group, and soccer practice contexts. Implications for intervention are also discussed. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-014-2348-7 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=259

---

1 (1 - 1 / 1)