[article]
| Titre : |
Using the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised and the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule with Young Children with Developmental Delay: Evaluating Diagnostic Validity |
| Type de document : |
texte imprimé |
| Auteurs : |
Kylie M. GRAY, Auteur ; Bruce J. TONGE, Auteur ; Deborah J. SWEENEY, Auteur |
| Année de publication : |
2008 |
| Article en page(s) : |
p.657-667 |
| Langues : |
Anglais (eng) |
| Mots-clés : |
Preschool-children ADI-R ADOS Diagnostic-validity |
| Index. décimale : |
PER Périodiques |
| Résumé : |
Few studies have focused on the validity of the ADI-R and ADOS in the assessment of preschool children with developmental delay. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic validity of the ADI-R and the ADOS in young children. Two-hundred and nine children aged 20–55 months participated in the study, 120 of whom received a diagnosis of autism. ADI-R and ADOS diagnostic classifications were compared to consensus clinical diagnoses. Children with a clinical diagnosis of autism scored significantly higher on all algorithm domains of the ADI-R and ADOS. The ADOS performed better than the ADI-R in comparison to consensus clinical diagnosis. Characteristics of the ADI-R and ADOS false positive and false negative cases are explored. Further research is recommended in terms of examining which items of the ADI-R best predict a diagnosis of autism for very young children with developmental problems.
|
| En ligne : |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-007-0432-y |
| Permalink : |
https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=340 |
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 38-4 (April 2008) . - p.657-667
[article] Using the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised and the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule with Young Children with Developmental Delay: Evaluating Diagnostic Validity [texte imprimé] / Kylie M. GRAY, Auteur ; Bruce J. TONGE, Auteur ; Deborah J. SWEENEY, Auteur . - 2008 . - p.657-667. Langues : Anglais ( eng) in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 38-4 (April 2008) . - p.657-667
| Mots-clés : |
Preschool-children ADI-R ADOS Diagnostic-validity |
| Index. décimale : |
PER Périodiques |
| Résumé : |
Few studies have focused on the validity of the ADI-R and ADOS in the assessment of preschool children with developmental delay. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic validity of the ADI-R and the ADOS in young children. Two-hundred and nine children aged 20–55 months participated in the study, 120 of whom received a diagnosis of autism. ADI-R and ADOS diagnostic classifications were compared to consensus clinical diagnoses. Children with a clinical diagnosis of autism scored significantly higher on all algorithm domains of the ADI-R and ADOS. The ADOS performed better than the ADI-R in comparison to consensus clinical diagnosis. Characteristics of the ADI-R and ADOS false positive and false negative cases are explored. Further research is recommended in terms of examining which items of the ADI-R best predict a diagnosis of autism for very young children with developmental problems.
|
| En ligne : |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-007-0432-y |
| Permalink : |
https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=340 |
|  |
Using the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised and the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule with Young Children with Developmental Delay: Evaluating Diagnostic Validity in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38-4 (April 2008)
