[article]
| Titre : |
Utility of three N-Item scales of the child behavior checklist 6–18 in autism diagnosis |
| Type de document : |
Texte imprimé et/ou numérique |
| Auteurs : |
Amy CAMODECA, Auteur |
| Article en page(s) : |
p.75-85 |
| Langues : |
Anglais (eng) |
| Mots-clés : |
Child behavior checklist ASD ADOS Diagnosis |
| Index. décimale : |
PER Périodiques |
| Résumé : |
Background There is a need for well-validated questionnaire measures as an adjuvant to autism diagnosis. Three past research studies have each delineated a subsample of questions (5-, 9-, and 10-items) from the Child Behavior Checklist 6–18 (CBCL-6-18) that differentiate children with autism from those without (Achenbach & Rescorla, 2001; Duarte, Bordin, Oliveira, & Bird, 2003; Ooi, Rescorla, Ang, Woo, & Fung, 2011; So et al., 2012). Despite the potential of these subscales, no research aside from the initial investigations has been published, and the initial studies had methodological limitations. Method This study investigated the criterion validity of the 5-, 9-, and 10-item autism subscales in a well-characterized sample of 483 community-referred children (X?age?=?10.11, SDage?=?2.99, Autism n?=?127; Not-Autism n?=?356). Autism diagnosis was made using the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule-2 and children were diagnosed according to DSM-5 criteria. Results Receiver Operating Characteristic analyses indicated Area Under the Curve in the poor range (0.633–.684 [95%CIs?=?0.578–.734], ps? |
| En ligne : |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2018.04.004 |
| Permalink : |
https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=362 |
in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders > 51 (July 2018) . - p.75-85
[article] Utility of three N-Item scales of the child behavior checklist 6–18 in autism diagnosis [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Amy CAMODECA, Auteur . - p.75-85. Langues : Anglais ( eng) in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders > 51 (July 2018) . - p.75-85
| Mots-clés : |
Child behavior checklist ASD ADOS Diagnosis |
| Index. décimale : |
PER Périodiques |
| Résumé : |
Background There is a need for well-validated questionnaire measures as an adjuvant to autism diagnosis. Three past research studies have each delineated a subsample of questions (5-, 9-, and 10-items) from the Child Behavior Checklist 6–18 (CBCL-6-18) that differentiate children with autism from those without (Achenbach & Rescorla, 2001; Duarte, Bordin, Oliveira, & Bird, 2003; Ooi, Rescorla, Ang, Woo, & Fung, 2011; So et al., 2012). Despite the potential of these subscales, no research aside from the initial investigations has been published, and the initial studies had methodological limitations. Method This study investigated the criterion validity of the 5-, 9-, and 10-item autism subscales in a well-characterized sample of 483 community-referred children (X?age?=?10.11, SDage?=?2.99, Autism n?=?127; Not-Autism n?=?356). Autism diagnosis was made using the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule-2 and children were diagnosed according to DSM-5 criteria. Results Receiver Operating Characteristic analyses indicated Area Under the Curve in the poor range (0.633–.684 [95%CIs?=?0.578–.734], ps? |
| En ligne : |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2018.04.004 |
| Permalink : |
https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=362 |
|
Utility of three N-Item scales of the child behavior checklist 6–18 in autism diagnosis in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 51 (July 2018)
