
- <Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
- CRA
- Informations pratiques
		- 
						Adresse
						Centre d'information et de documentation Horaires
 du CRA Rhône-Alpes
 Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
 bât 211
 95, Bd Pinel
 69678 Bron CedexLundi au Vendredi Contact
 9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65 Mail
 Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
 
- 
						Adresse
						
Auteur Katherine J. CONGER
|  | 
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (2)
 
                
             
            
                
                     
                
             
						
					
						
							 Faire une suggestion  Affiner la recherche
						
					   Faire une suggestion  Affiner la rechercheDisrupting intergenerational continuity in harsh parenting: Self-control and a supportive partner / Thomas J. SCHOFIELD in Development and Psychopathology, 29-4 (October 2017)

Titre : Disrupting intergenerational continuity in harsh parenting: Self-control and a supportive partner Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Thomas J. SCHOFIELD, Auteur ; Rand D. CONGER, Auteur ; Katherine J. CONGER, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.1279-1287 Langues : Anglais (eng) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Abstract Harsh, abusive, and rejecting behavior by parents toward their children is associated with increased risk for many developmental problems for youth. Children raised by harsh parents are also more likely to treat their own children harshly. The present study addresses conditions that would break this intergenerational cycle of harsh parenting. Data come from a three-generation study of a cohort of 290 adolescents (Generation 2 [G2], 52% female) grown to adulthood and their parents (Generation 1 [G1]). During adolescence, observers rated G1 harsh parenting to G2. Several years later observers rated G2 harsh parenting toward their oldest child (Generation 3 [G3]). Several adaptive systems fundamental to human resilience attenuate intergenerational continuity in harshness. G2 parents were relatively less harsh to G3 children (notwithstanding a history of harshness from G1) when G2's romantic partner (a) communicated positively with G2 and (b) had a good relationship with G3, and (c) when G2 was high on self-control. Interventions that target all of these protective factors may not only break but also reverse the intergenerational cycle of child maltreatment. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954579416001309 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=312 
in Development and Psychopathology > 29-4 (October 2017) . - p.1279-1287[article] Disrupting intergenerational continuity in harsh parenting: Self-control and a supportive partner [texte imprimé] / Thomas J. SCHOFIELD, Auteur ; Rand D. CONGER, Auteur ; Katherine J. CONGER, Auteur . - p.1279-1287.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Development and Psychopathology > 29-4 (October 2017) . - p.1279-1287
Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Abstract Harsh, abusive, and rejecting behavior by parents toward their children is associated with increased risk for many developmental problems for youth. Children raised by harsh parents are also more likely to treat their own children harshly. The present study addresses conditions that would break this intergenerational cycle of harsh parenting. Data come from a three-generation study of a cohort of 290 adolescents (Generation 2 [G2], 52% female) grown to adulthood and their parents (Generation 1 [G1]). During adolescence, observers rated G1 harsh parenting to G2. Several years later observers rated G2 harsh parenting toward their oldest child (Generation 3 [G3]). Several adaptive systems fundamental to human resilience attenuate intergenerational continuity in harshness. G2 parents were relatively less harsh to G3 children (notwithstanding a history of harshness from G1) when G2's romantic partner (a) communicated positively with G2 and (b) had a good relationship with G3, and (c) when G2 was high on self-control. Interventions that target all of these protective factors may not only break but also reverse the intergenerational cycle of child maltreatment. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954579416001309 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=312 Parenting and adolescents’ psychological adjustment: Longitudinal moderation by adolescents’ genetic sensitivity / Clare M. STOCKER in Development and Psychopathology, 29-4 (October 2017)

Titre : Parenting and adolescents’ psychological adjustment: Longitudinal moderation by adolescents’ genetic sensitivity Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Clare M. STOCKER, Auteur ; April S. MASARIK, Auteur ; Keith F. WIDAMAN, Auteur ; Ben T. REEB, Auteur ; Jason D. BOARDMAN, Auteur ; Andrew SMOLEN, Auteur ; Tricia K. NEPPL, Auteur ; Katherine J. CONGER, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.1289-1304 Langues : Anglais (eng) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Abstract We examined whether adolescents’ genetic sensitivity, measured by a polygenic index score, moderated the longitudinal associations between parenting and adolescents’ psychological adjustment. The sample included 323 mothers, fathers, and adolescents (177 female, 146 male; Time 1 [T1] average age = 12.61 years, SD = 0.54 years; Time 2 [T2] average age = 13.59 years, SD = 0.59 years). Parents’ warmth and hostility were rated by trained, independent observers using videotapes of family discussions. Adolescents reported their symptoms of anxiety, depressed mood, and hostility at T1 and T2. The results from autoregressive linear regression models showed that adolescents’ genetic sensitivity moderated associations between observations of both mothers’ and fathers’ T1 parenting and adolescents’ T2 composite maladjustment, depression, anxiety, and hostility. Compared to adolescents with low genetic sensitivity, adolescents with high genetic sensitivity had worse adjustment outcomes when parenting was low on warmth and high on hostility. When parenting was characterized by high warmth and low hostility, adolescents with high genetic sensitivity had better adjustment outcomes than their counterparts with low genetic sensitivity. The results support the differential susceptibility model and highlight the complex ways that genes and environment interact to influence development. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954579416001310 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=312 
in Development and Psychopathology > 29-4 (October 2017) . - p.1289-1304[article] Parenting and adolescents’ psychological adjustment: Longitudinal moderation by adolescents’ genetic sensitivity [texte imprimé] / Clare M. STOCKER, Auteur ; April S. MASARIK, Auteur ; Keith F. WIDAMAN, Auteur ; Ben T. REEB, Auteur ; Jason D. BOARDMAN, Auteur ; Andrew SMOLEN, Auteur ; Tricia K. NEPPL, Auteur ; Katherine J. CONGER, Auteur . - p.1289-1304.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Development and Psychopathology > 29-4 (October 2017) . - p.1289-1304
Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Abstract We examined whether adolescents’ genetic sensitivity, measured by a polygenic index score, moderated the longitudinal associations between parenting and adolescents’ psychological adjustment. The sample included 323 mothers, fathers, and adolescents (177 female, 146 male; Time 1 [T1] average age = 12.61 years, SD = 0.54 years; Time 2 [T2] average age = 13.59 years, SD = 0.59 years). Parents’ warmth and hostility were rated by trained, independent observers using videotapes of family discussions. Adolescents reported their symptoms of anxiety, depressed mood, and hostility at T1 and T2. The results from autoregressive linear regression models showed that adolescents’ genetic sensitivity moderated associations between observations of both mothers’ and fathers’ T1 parenting and adolescents’ T2 composite maladjustment, depression, anxiety, and hostility. Compared to adolescents with low genetic sensitivity, adolescents with high genetic sensitivity had worse adjustment outcomes when parenting was low on warmth and high on hostility. When parenting was characterized by high warmth and low hostility, adolescents with high genetic sensitivity had better adjustment outcomes than their counterparts with low genetic sensitivity. The results support the differential susceptibility model and highlight the complex ways that genes and environment interact to influence development. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954579416001310 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=312 

