[article]
Titre : |
Editorial: Improving children's mental health. What does that mean, actually? |
Type de document : |
Texte imprimé et/ou numérique |
Auteurs : |
A. J. OLDEHINKEL, Auteur |
Article en page(s) : |
p.825-827 |
Langues : |
Anglais (eng) |
Mots-clés : |
Children belief systems interventions mental health |
Index. décimale : |
PER Périodiques |
Résumé : |
The importance of promoting child and adolescent mental health seems self-evident. However, child and adolescent psychologists and psychiatrists are not necessarily in agreement with each other about what promoting mental health means, the desirability of intervening to influence development, and whether improving mental health promotion justifies reducing young people's autonomy. If expressed and discussed openly, diverging views and opinions about these issues can be constructive and deepen insights. Philosophical discussions about the belief systems and their relation to theoretical models underlying specific research questions, methodological choices, and interpretations of findings raise awareness of the inherent subjectivity of mental health evidence and research, and stimulate 'clear thinking', arguably the most valuable implement in any scientist's toolbox. |
En ligne : |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13097 |
Permalink : |
https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=404 |
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 60-8 (August 2019) . - p.825-827
[article] Editorial: Improving children's mental health. What does that mean, actually? [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / A. J. OLDEHINKEL, Auteur . - p.825-827. Langues : Anglais ( eng) in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 60-8 (August 2019) . - p.825-827
Mots-clés : |
Children belief systems interventions mental health |
Index. décimale : |
PER Périodiques |
Résumé : |
The importance of promoting child and adolescent mental health seems self-evident. However, child and adolescent psychologists and psychiatrists are not necessarily in agreement with each other about what promoting mental health means, the desirability of intervening to influence development, and whether improving mental health promotion justifies reducing young people's autonomy. If expressed and discussed openly, diverging views and opinions about these issues can be constructive and deepen insights. Philosophical discussions about the belief systems and their relation to theoretical models underlying specific research questions, methodological choices, and interpretations of findings raise awareness of the inherent subjectivity of mental health evidence and research, and stimulate 'clear thinking', arguably the most valuable implement in any scientist's toolbox. |
En ligne : |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13097 |
Permalink : |
https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=404 |
|