Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Goda TRAIDARAIT? |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (1)
Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
The assessment of social responsiveness scale Lithuanian version / Dalia V?LAVI?IEN? in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 70 (February 2020)
[article]
Titre : The assessment of social responsiveness scale Lithuanian version Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Dalia V?LAVI?IEN?, Auteur ; Virginija ADOMAITIEN?, Auteur ; Goda TRAIDARAIT?, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.101489 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Autism spectrum disorder Social responsiveness scale Screening Psychometrics Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background The process of adapting and validating standardised methods commonly used around the world for screening and assessing autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is just beginning in the Baltic states. To date, only the Childhood Autism Rating Scale has been validated, 19 years ago in Lithuania. The current study was conducted to assess the internal consistency, concurrent validity, sensitivity and specificity of one of the internationally recognised scales for quantitatively assessing the features of autism—the Social Responsiveness Scale–Second Edition (SRS-2) parent form —translated into Lithuanian. Methods The study sample consisted of an ASD sample of 33 participants with a mean age of 10.5 years (SD?=?2.8) and an age-matched normative sample of 99 participants with a mean age of 9.8 years (SD?=?2.8). The Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL) and the SRS-2 were completed by parents. Reliability was assessed by calculating internal consistency, the sensitivity and specificity of the scale was determined through receiver operating characteristic analysis and concurrent validity was explored using Spearman’s correlations. Results In accordance with previous findings, the internal consistency of the SRS was satisfactory to good. Good concurrent validity was also found. The SRS-2 showed an ability to differentiate participants with ASD from control participants with excellent sensitivity. All intercorrelations between the SRS-2 and the CBCL syndrome scales were significant. Conclusions Our results demonstrate the high sensitivity of the SRS-2 parent form. This implies that the SRS-2 subscales may have utility in Lithuanian research as well as in clinical practice for appropriately targeted interventions. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2019.101489 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=414
in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders > 70 (February 2020) . - p.101489[article] The assessment of social responsiveness scale Lithuanian version [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Dalia V?LAVI?IEN?, Auteur ; Virginija ADOMAITIEN?, Auteur ; Goda TRAIDARAIT?, Auteur . - p.101489.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders > 70 (February 2020) . - p.101489
Mots-clés : Autism spectrum disorder Social responsiveness scale Screening Psychometrics Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background The process of adapting and validating standardised methods commonly used around the world for screening and assessing autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is just beginning in the Baltic states. To date, only the Childhood Autism Rating Scale has been validated, 19 years ago in Lithuania. The current study was conducted to assess the internal consistency, concurrent validity, sensitivity and specificity of one of the internationally recognised scales for quantitatively assessing the features of autism—the Social Responsiveness Scale–Second Edition (SRS-2) parent form —translated into Lithuanian. Methods The study sample consisted of an ASD sample of 33 participants with a mean age of 10.5 years (SD?=?2.8) and an age-matched normative sample of 99 participants with a mean age of 9.8 years (SD?=?2.8). The Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL) and the SRS-2 were completed by parents. Reliability was assessed by calculating internal consistency, the sensitivity and specificity of the scale was determined through receiver operating characteristic analysis and concurrent validity was explored using Spearman’s correlations. Results In accordance with previous findings, the internal consistency of the SRS was satisfactory to good. Good concurrent validity was also found. The SRS-2 showed an ability to differentiate participants with ASD from control participants with excellent sensitivity. All intercorrelations between the SRS-2 and the CBCL syndrome scales were significant. Conclusions Our results demonstrate the high sensitivity of the SRS-2 parent form. This implies that the SRS-2 subscales may have utility in Lithuanian research as well as in clinical practice for appropriately targeted interventions. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2019.101489 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=414