Perceptions of implementing facing your fears in hospital and community organizations / Laura BERLANDA in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 80 (February 2021)  

Public ISBD [article]  inResearch in Autism Spectrum Disorders > 80 (February 2021) . - p.101700 Titre : Perceptions of implementing facing your fears in hospital and community organizations Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Laura BERLANDA, Auteur ; Carly A. MCMORRIS, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.101700 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Implementation science  Autism  Anxiety  Facing your fears  Qualitative research Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background Implementation science is essential for identifying the strengths and challenges of evidence-based interventions when they are delivered in community settings. We examined the implementation of Facing Your Fears (FYF), a cognitive behaviour group intervention for autistic children and youth who experience co-occurring anxiety, in a hospital setting versus a community setting. Method This qualitative study was based on theories of diffusion of innovation and mutual adaptation and explored the implementation process through the perceptions of facilitators and managers. Sixteen multi-disciplinary facilitators and managers were interviewed regarding their perceptions of the compatibility, complexity, relative advantages, barriers, challenges, and adaptations that arose during implementation of FYF. Results Overall, facilitators and managers from both organizations reported that FYF had good compatibility with their organization, implementation of FYF was not too complex, and members of each organization reported advantages that were directly related to their setting. Facilitators and managers reported barriers and challenges that were organized into four theme-categories: system-level, intervention delivery, logistics, and individual and family. Adaptation themes aligned with the barriers and challenges that each organization encountered when implementing FYF, and modifications were made to both the intervention and the organization structure to overcome implementation challenges. Conclusion This is the first study to examine implementation of FYF in two different settings, providing essential knowledge on the versatility and sustainability of this program in multiple healthcare settings. Facilitators and managers identified specific characteristics, barriers, and adaptations for FYF that can provide insight for organizations considering FYF implementation. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2020.101700 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=438 [article] Perceptions of implementing facing your fears in hospital and community organizations [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Laura BERLANDA, Auteur ; Carly A. MCMORRIS, Auteur . - p.101700. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders > 80 (February 2021) . - p.101700 Mots-clés : Implementation science  Autism  Anxiety  Facing your fears  Qualitative research Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background Implementation science is essential for identifying the strengths and challenges of evidence-based interventions when they are delivered in community settings. We examined the implementation of Facing Your Fears (FYF), a cognitive behaviour group intervention for autistic children and youth who experience co-occurring anxiety, in a hospital setting versus a community setting. Method This qualitative study was based on theories of diffusion of innovation and mutual adaptation and explored the implementation process through the perceptions of facilitators and managers. Sixteen multi-disciplinary facilitators and managers were interviewed regarding their perceptions of the compatibility, complexity, relative advantages, barriers, challenges, and adaptations that arose during implementation of FYF. Results Overall, facilitators and managers from both organizations reported that FYF had good compatibility with their organization, implementation of FYF was not too complex, and members of each organization reported advantages that were directly related to their setting. Facilitators and managers reported barriers and challenges that were organized into four theme-categories: system-level, intervention delivery, logistics, and individual and family. Adaptation themes aligned with the barriers and challenges that each organization encountered when implementing FYF, and modifications were made to both the intervention and the organization structure to overcome implementation challenges. Conclusion This is the first study to examine implementation of FYF in two different settings, providing essential knowledge on the versatility and sustainability of this program in multiple healthcare settings. Facilitators and managers identified specific characteristics, barriers, and adaptations for FYF that can provide insight for organizations considering FYF implementation. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2020.101700 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=438

---

1 (1 - 1 / 1)