Caregiver perspectives on interventions for behavior challenges in autistic children / Jessica E. TSCHIDA in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 81 (March 2021)  

Public ISBD [article]  inResearch in Autism Spectrum Disorders > 81 (March 2021) . - 101714 Titre : Caregiver perspectives on interventions for behavior challenges in autistic children Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Jessica E. TSCHIDA, Auteur ; Brenna B. MADDOX, Auteur ; Jennifer R. BERTOLLO, Auteur ; Emily S. KUSCHNER, Auteur ; Judith S. MILLER, Auteur ; Thomas H. OLLENDICK, Auteur ; Ross W. GREENE, Auteur ; Benjamin E. YERYS, Auteur Article en page(s) : 101714 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Aggression  Autism  Intervention  Parent  School-age Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background Children with an autism spectrum disorder (ASD) diagnosis have high rates of behaviors such as aggression, oppositional behaviors, and tantrums. Despite effectiveness of interventions for these behavior challenges in a considerable number of autistic children, there is little information on stakeholder perspectives about available interventions. The present study preliminarily characterized caregiver perspectives on intervention for behavior challenges in school-age autistic children. Method 321 caregivers of autistic children completed a survey about interventions used to address behavior challenges. Kruskal-Wallis rank-sum tests and subsequent pairwise comparisons using a Wilcoxon rank-sum test with False-Discovery Rate-adjusted p-values (q<0.05) were conducted for caregiver ratings of interventions. Thematic analysis was conducted for caregivers’ open-ended suggestions for improving interventions. Results Caregivers indicated limited approval of attempted interventions. For children with an IQ ≥ 70, the omnibus test was significant for caregiver ratings of intervention helpfulness (χ2(8) = 38.707, q<0.001, ε2 = 0.017) with medications and Collaborative & Proactive Solutions (CPS; Greene, 2010) therapy rated highest, and was significant for caregiver ratings of amount of improvement maintained over time (χ2(8) = 46.013, q<0.001, ε2 = 0.020) with medications, CPS, applied behavioral analysis (ABA), and “other interventions” rated highest. For children with an IQ < 70, pairwise tests revealed no significant differences. Caregivers suggested improvements at the systems, provider, caregiver/family, and child/intervention levels. Conclusions Caregivers’ limited approval of interventions used to address behavior challenges suggests the need for improved intervention options. While medications and ABA are standard-of-care interventions, CPS may be a caregiver-preferred and efficacious option that is underutilized among autistic children with an IQ ≥ 70. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2020.101714 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=440 [article] Caregiver perspectives on interventions for behavior challenges in autistic children [texte imprimé] / Jessica E. TSCHIDA, Auteur ; Brenna B. MADDOX, Auteur ; Jennifer R. BERTOLLO, Auteur ; Emily S. KUSCHNER, Auteur ; Judith S. MILLER, Auteur ; Thomas H. OLLENDICK, Auteur ; Ross W. GREENE, Auteur ; Benjamin E. YERYS, Auteur . - 101714. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders > 81 (March 2021) . - 101714 Mots-clés : Aggression  Autism  Intervention  Parent  School-age Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background Children with an autism spectrum disorder (ASD) diagnosis have high rates of behaviors such as aggression, oppositional behaviors, and tantrums. Despite effectiveness of interventions for these behavior challenges in a considerable number of autistic children, there is little information on stakeholder perspectives about available interventions. The present study preliminarily characterized caregiver perspectives on intervention for behavior challenges in school-age autistic children. Method 321 caregivers of autistic children completed a survey about interventions used to address behavior challenges. Kruskal-Wallis rank-sum tests and subsequent pairwise comparisons using a Wilcoxon rank-sum test with False-Discovery Rate-adjusted p-values (q<0.05) were conducted for caregiver ratings of interventions. Thematic analysis was conducted for caregivers’ open-ended suggestions for improving interventions. Results Caregivers indicated limited approval of attempted interventions. For children with an IQ ≥ 70, the omnibus test was significant for caregiver ratings of intervention helpfulness (χ2(8) = 38.707, q<0.001, ε2 = 0.017) with medications and Collaborative & Proactive Solutions (CPS; Greene, 2010) therapy rated highest, and was significant for caregiver ratings of amount of improvement maintained over time (χ2(8) = 46.013, q<0.001, ε2 = 0.020) with medications, CPS, applied behavioral analysis (ABA), and “other interventions” rated highest. For children with an IQ < 70, pairwise tests revealed no significant differences. Caregivers suggested improvements at the systems, provider, caregiver/family, and child/intervention levels. Conclusions Caregivers’ limited approval of interventions used to address behavior challenges suggests the need for improved intervention options. While medications and ABA are standard-of-care interventions, CPS may be a caregiver-preferred and efficacious option that is underutilized among autistic children with an IQ ≥ 70. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2020.101714 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=440

Reported quality indicators and implementation outcomes of community partnership in autism intervention research: A systematic review / Jessica E. TSCHIDA in Autism Research, 17-2 (February 2024)  

Public ISBD [article]  inAutism Research > 17-2 (February 2024) . - p.215-233 Titre : Reported quality indicators and implementation outcomes of community partnership in autism intervention research: A systematic review Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Jessica E. TSCHIDA, Auteur ; James D. LEE, Auteur ; Anamiguel POMALES-RAMOS, Auteur ; Vivien KOO, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.215-233 Langues : Anglais (eng) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Abstract There is minimal research on the quality of community partnerships in studies of interventions for autistic children. However, building high quality community engagement in autism intervention research may improve implementation outcomes. This systematic review examined studies that report community partnership in autism intervention research. A total of 135 articles were identified and 11 of these articles were included in the final review. Community partnership data were extracted using indicators from the conceptual framework for assessing research-practice partnerships (RPP; Henrick et al., Henrick et al., Assessing research-practice partnerships: Five dimensions of effectiveness, William T. Grant Foundation, 2017) and implementation outcomes data were extracted using the taxonomy of distinct implementation outcomes (Proctor et al., Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 38:65-76, 2011). Quality of studies were appraised using JBIs critical appraisal tools (Munn et al., JBI Evidence Synthesis, 18:2127-2133, 2020). RPP indicators and implementation outcomes were variably reported across studies. RPP indicators and implementation outcomes more likely to be reported were related to building trust, cultivating partnership relationships, conducting rigorous research to inform action, acceptability, and feasibility. RPP indicators and implementation outcomes less likely to be reported were related to building capacity to engage in partnership work, sustainability, cost, and penetration. Together, these results may suggest the need for increased sustainability and capacity building efforts in partnerships and increased guidelines for reporting outcomes. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.3103 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=522 [article] Reported quality indicators and implementation outcomes of community partnership in autism intervention research: A systematic review [texte imprimé] / Jessica E. TSCHIDA, Auteur ; James D. LEE, Auteur ; Anamiguel POMALES-RAMOS, Auteur ; Vivien KOO, Auteur . - p.215-233. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Autism Research > 17-2 (February 2024) . - p.215-233 Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Abstract There is minimal research on the quality of community partnerships in studies of interventions for autistic children. However, building high quality community engagement in autism intervention research may improve implementation outcomes. This systematic review examined studies that report community partnership in autism intervention research. A total of 135 articles were identified and 11 of these articles were included in the final review. Community partnership data were extracted using indicators from the conceptual framework for assessing research-practice partnerships (RPP; Henrick et al., Henrick et al., Assessing research-practice partnerships: Five dimensions of effectiveness, William T. Grant Foundation, 2017) and implementation outcomes data were extracted using the taxonomy of distinct implementation outcomes (Proctor et al., Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 38:65-76, 2011). Quality of studies were appraised using JBIs critical appraisal tools (Munn et al., JBI Evidence Synthesis, 18:2127-2133, 2020). RPP indicators and implementation outcomes were variably reported across studies. RPP indicators and implementation outcomes more likely to be reported were related to building trust, cultivating partnership relationships, conducting rigorous research to inform action, acceptability, and feasibility. RPP indicators and implementation outcomes less likely to be reported were related to building capacity to engage in partnership work, sustainability, cost, and penetration. Together, these results may suggest the need for increased sustainability and capacity building efforts in partnerships and increased guidelines for reporting outcomes. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.3103 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=522

---

1 (1 - 2 / 2) Par page : 25 50 100 200