[article]
Titre : |
Prevalence and predictive value of ICD-11 post-traumatic stress disorder and Complex PTSD diagnoses in children and adolescents exposed to a single-event trauma |
Type de document : |
Texte imprimé et/ou numérique |
Auteurs : |
Rachel ELLIOTT, Auteur ; Anna MCKINNON, Auteur ; Clare DIXON, Auteur ; Adrian BOYLE, Auteur ; Fionnuala MURPHY, Auteur ; Theresa DAHM, Auteur ; Emma TRAVERS-HILL, Auteur ; Cari-Lène MUL, Auteur ; Sarah-Jane ARCHIBALD, Auteur ; Patrick SMITH, Auteur ; Tim DALGLEISH, Auteur ; Richard MEISER-STEDMAN, Auteur ; Caitlin HITCHCOCK, Auteur |
Article en page(s) : |
p.270-276 |
Langues : |
Anglais (eng) |
Mots-clés : |
Complex PTSD International Classification of Diseases Post-traumatic stress disorder adolescent child trauma |
Index. décimale : |
PER Périodiques |
Résumé : |
BACKGROUND: The 11th edition of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) made a number of significant changes to the diagnostic criteria for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). We sought to determine the prevalence and 3-month predictive values of the new ICD-11 PTSD criteria relative to ICD-10 PTSD, in children and adolescents following a single traumatic event. ICD-11 also introduced a diagnosis of Complex PTSD (CPTSD), proposed to typically result from prolonged, chronic exposure to traumatic experiences, although the CPTSD diagnostic criteria do not require a repeated experience of trauma. We therefore explored whether children and adolescents demonstrate ICD-11 CPTSD features following exposure to a single-incident trauma. METHOD: Data were analysed from a prospective cohort study of youth aged 8-17 years who had attended an emergency department following a single trauma. Assessments of PTSD, CPTSD, depressive and anxiety symptoms were performed at two to four weeks (n = 226) and nine weeks (n = 208) post-trauma, allowing us to calculate and compare the prevalence and predictive value of ICD-10 and ICD-11 PTSD criteria, along with CPTSD. Predictive abilities of different diagnostic thresholds were undertaken using positive/negative predictive values, sensitivity/specificity statistics and logistic regressions. RESULTS: At Week 9, 15 participants (7%) were identified as experiencing ICD-11 PTSD, compared to 23 (11%) experiencing ICD-10 PTSD. There was no significant difference in comorbidity rates between ICD-10 and ICD-11 PTSD diagnoses. Ninety per cent of participants with ICD-11 PTSD also met criteria for at least one CPTSD feature. Five participants met full CPTSD criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Reduced prevalence of PTSD associated with the use of ICD-11 criteria is likely to reduce identification of PTSD relative to using ICD-10 criteria but not relative to DSM-4 and DSM-5 criteria. Diagnosis of CPTSD is likely to be infrequent following single-incident trauma. |
En ligne : |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13240 |
Permalink : |
https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=443 |
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 62-3 (March 2021) . - p.270-276
[article] Prevalence and predictive value of ICD-11 post-traumatic stress disorder and Complex PTSD diagnoses in children and adolescents exposed to a single-event trauma [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Rachel ELLIOTT, Auteur ; Anna MCKINNON, Auteur ; Clare DIXON, Auteur ; Adrian BOYLE, Auteur ; Fionnuala MURPHY, Auteur ; Theresa DAHM, Auteur ; Emma TRAVERS-HILL, Auteur ; Cari-Lène MUL, Auteur ; Sarah-Jane ARCHIBALD, Auteur ; Patrick SMITH, Auteur ; Tim DALGLEISH, Auteur ; Richard MEISER-STEDMAN, Auteur ; Caitlin HITCHCOCK, Auteur . - p.270-276. Langues : Anglais ( eng) in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 62-3 (March 2021) . - p.270-276
Mots-clés : |
Complex PTSD International Classification of Diseases Post-traumatic stress disorder adolescent child trauma |
Index. décimale : |
PER Périodiques |
Résumé : |
BACKGROUND: The 11th edition of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) made a number of significant changes to the diagnostic criteria for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). We sought to determine the prevalence and 3-month predictive values of the new ICD-11 PTSD criteria relative to ICD-10 PTSD, in children and adolescents following a single traumatic event. ICD-11 also introduced a diagnosis of Complex PTSD (CPTSD), proposed to typically result from prolonged, chronic exposure to traumatic experiences, although the CPTSD diagnostic criteria do not require a repeated experience of trauma. We therefore explored whether children and adolescents demonstrate ICD-11 CPTSD features following exposure to a single-incident trauma. METHOD: Data were analysed from a prospective cohort study of youth aged 8-17 years who had attended an emergency department following a single trauma. Assessments of PTSD, CPTSD, depressive and anxiety symptoms were performed at two to four weeks (n = 226) and nine weeks (n = 208) post-trauma, allowing us to calculate and compare the prevalence and predictive value of ICD-10 and ICD-11 PTSD criteria, along with CPTSD. Predictive abilities of different diagnostic thresholds were undertaken using positive/negative predictive values, sensitivity/specificity statistics and logistic regressions. RESULTS: At Week 9, 15 participants (7%) were identified as experiencing ICD-11 PTSD, compared to 23 (11%) experiencing ICD-10 PTSD. There was no significant difference in comorbidity rates between ICD-10 and ICD-11 PTSD diagnoses. Ninety per cent of participants with ICD-11 PTSD also met criteria for at least one CPTSD feature. Five participants met full CPTSD criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Reduced prevalence of PTSD associated with the use of ICD-11 criteria is likely to reduce identification of PTSD relative to using ICD-10 criteria but not relative to DSM-4 and DSM-5 criteria. Diagnosis of CPTSD is likely to be infrequent following single-incident trauma. |
En ligne : |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13240 |
Permalink : |
https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=443 |
|