
- <Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
- CRA
- Informations pratiques
		- 
						Adresse
						Centre d'information et de documentation Horaires
 du CRA Rhône-Alpes
 Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
 bât 211
 95, Bd Pinel
 69678 Bron CedexLundi au Vendredi Contact
 9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65 Mail
 Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
 
- 
						Adresse
						
Auteur Brynhildur AXELSDOTTIR
|  | 
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (2)
 
                
             
            
                
                     
                
             
						
					
						
							 Faire une suggestion  Affiner la recherche
						
					   Faire une suggestion  Affiner la rechercheApplicability and Psychometric Properties of General Mental Health Assessment Tools in Autistic People: A Systematic Review / Arvid Nikolai KILDAHL ; Sabine KAISER ; Brynhildur AXELSDOTTIR ; Michael G. AMAN ; Sissel Berge HELVERSCHOU in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 55-5 (May 2025)

Titre : Applicability and Psychometric Properties of General Mental Health Assessment Tools in Autistic People: A Systematic Review Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Arvid Nikolai KILDAHL, Auteur ; Sabine KAISER, Auteur ; Brynhildur AXELSDOTTIR, Auteur ; Michael G. AMAN, Auteur ; Sissel Berge HELVERSCHOU, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.1713-1726 Langues : Anglais (eng) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : In recent years, there has been a proliferation of instruments for assessing mental health (MH) among autistic people. This study aimed to review the psychometric properties of broadband instruments used to assess MH problems among autistic people. In accordance with the PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO: CRD42022316571) we searched the APA PsycINFO via Ovid, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase and the Web of Science via Clarivate databases from 1980 to March 2022, with an updated search in January 2024, to identify very recent empirical studies. Independent reviewers evaluated the titles and abstracts of the retrieved records (n = 11,577) and full-text articles (n = 1000). Data were extracted from eligible studies, and the quality of the included papers was appraised. In all, 164empirical articles reporting on 35 instruments were included. The review showed variable evidence of reliability and validity of the various instruments. Among the instruments reported in more than one study, the Aberrant Behavior Checklist had consistently good or excellent psychometric evidence. The reliability and validity of other instruments, including: the Developmental Behavior Checklist, Emotion Dysregulation Inventory, Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory, Autism Spectrum Disorder-Comorbid for Children Scale, and Psychopathology in Autism Checklist, were less documented. There is a need for a greater evidence-base for MH assessment tools for autistic people. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-024-06324-3 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=554 
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 55-5 (May 2025) . - p.1713-1726[article] Applicability and Psychometric Properties of General Mental Health Assessment Tools in Autistic People: A Systematic Review [texte imprimé] / Arvid Nikolai KILDAHL, Auteur ; Sabine KAISER, Auteur ; Brynhildur AXELSDOTTIR, Auteur ; Michael G. AMAN, Auteur ; Sissel Berge HELVERSCHOU, Auteur . - p.1713-1726.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 55-5 (May 2025) . - p.1713-1726
Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : In recent years, there has been a proliferation of instruments for assessing mental health (MH) among autistic people. This study aimed to review the psychometric properties of broadband instruments used to assess MH problems among autistic people. In accordance with the PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO: CRD42022316571) we searched the APA PsycINFO via Ovid, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase and the Web of Science via Clarivate databases from 1980 to March 2022, with an updated search in January 2024, to identify very recent empirical studies. Independent reviewers evaluated the titles and abstracts of the retrieved records (n = 11,577) and full-text articles (n = 1000). Data were extracted from eligible studies, and the quality of the included papers was appraised. In all, 164empirical articles reporting on 35 instruments were included. The review showed variable evidence of reliability and validity of the various instruments. Among the instruments reported in more than one study, the Aberrant Behavior Checklist had consistently good or excellent psychometric evidence. The reliability and validity of other instruments, including: the Developmental Behavior Checklist, Emotion Dysregulation Inventory, Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory, Autism Spectrum Disorder-Comorbid for Children Scale, and Psychopathology in Autism Checklist, were less documented. There is a need for a greater evidence-base for MH assessment tools for autistic people. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-024-06324-3 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=554 General Measurement Tools for Assessing Mental Health Problems Among Children and Adolescents with an Intellectual Disability: A Systematic Review / Marianne BERG HALVORSEN in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 53-1 (January 2023)

Titre : General Measurement Tools for Assessing Mental Health Problems Among Children and Adolescents with an Intellectual Disability: A Systematic Review Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Marianne BERG HALVORSEN, Auteur ; Sissel Berge HELVERSCHOU, Auteur ; Brynhildur AXELSDOTTIR, Auteur ; Per HÃ¥kan BRØNDBO, Auteur ; Monica MARTINUSSEN, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.132-204 Langues : Anglais (eng) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : There is a need for more knowledge of valid and standardized measures of mental health problems among children and adolescents with intellectual disability (ID). In this study, we systematically reviewed and evaluated the psychometric properties of instruments used to assess general mental health problems in this population. Following PRISMA guidelines, we reviewed empirical research published from 1980 through February 2020 with an updated search in March 2021 in Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, Health and Psychological Instruments, CINAHL, ERIC, and Web of Science databases. Forty-nine empirical articles were included in this review. Overall, the review indicated consistently better documentation of the reliability and validity of instruments designed for the ID population compared to instruments developed for the general child population. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-021-05419-5 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=493 
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 53-1 (January 2023) . - p.132-204[article] General Measurement Tools for Assessing Mental Health Problems Among Children and Adolescents with an Intellectual Disability: A Systematic Review [texte imprimé] / Marianne BERG HALVORSEN, Auteur ; Sissel Berge HELVERSCHOU, Auteur ; Brynhildur AXELSDOTTIR, Auteur ; Per Håkan BRØNDBO, Auteur ; Monica MARTINUSSEN, Auteur . - p.132-204.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 53-1 (January 2023) . - p.132-204
Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : There is a need for more knowledge of valid and standardized measures of mental health problems among children and adolescents with intellectual disability (ID). In this study, we systematically reviewed and evaluated the psychometric properties of instruments used to assess general mental health problems in this population. Following PRISMA guidelines, we reviewed empirical research published from 1980 through February 2020 with an updated search in March 2021 in Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, Health and Psychological Instruments, CINAHL, ERIC, and Web of Science databases. Forty-nine empirical articles were included in this review. Overall, the review indicated consistently better documentation of the reliability and validity of instruments designed for the ID population compared to instruments developed for the general child population. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-021-05419-5 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=493 

