Paranoia and Data-Gathering Biases in Autism / Kristina BENNERT in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 55-4 (April 2024)  

Public ISBD [article]  inJournal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 55-4 (April 2024) . - p.1402-1410 Titre : Paranoia and Data-Gathering Biases in Autism Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Kristina BENNERT, Auteur ; Mark BROSNAN, Auteur ; Amy CANNING, Auteur ; Ged ROBERTS, Auteur ; Ailsa RUSSELL, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.1402-1410 Langues : Anglais (eng) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Previous research has identified contradictory patterns in autism upon probabilistic reasoning tasks, and high levels of self-report paranoia symptoms have also been reported. To explore this relationship, the present study assessed 64 non-autistic and 39 autistic adults on two variants of a probabilistic reasoning task which examined the amount of evidence required before making a decision and 'jumping to conclusions' (a neutral beads task and an emotionally-salient words variant). The autism group was found to require significantly more evidence before making a decision and to have significantly less jumping to conclusions than the non-autistic group. For those with relatively low levels of paranoia, the emotionally-salient variant impacted on the non-autistic group, but not the autism group. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-024-06301-w Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=550 [article] Paranoia and Data-Gathering Biases in Autism [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Kristina BENNERT, Auteur ; Mark BROSNAN, Auteur ; Amy CANNING, Auteur ; Ged ROBERTS, Auteur ; Ailsa RUSSELL, Auteur . - p.1402-1410. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 55-4 (April 2024) . - p.1402-1410 Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Previous research has identified contradictory patterns in autism upon probabilistic reasoning tasks, and high levels of self-report paranoia symptoms have also been reported. To explore this relationship, the present study assessed 64 non-autistic and 39 autistic adults on two variants of a probabilistic reasoning task which examined the amount of evidence required before making a decision and 'jumping to conclusions' (a neutral beads task and an emotionally-salient words variant). The autism group was found to require significantly more evidence before making a decision and to have significantly less jumping to conclusions than the non-autistic group. For those with relatively low levels of paranoia, the emotionally-salient variant impacted on the non-autistic group, but not the autism group. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-024-06301-w Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=550

---

1 (1 - 1 / 1)