The stability of the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule-2 in children aged 14–36 months with elevated likelihood for autism / Sarah SCHAUBROECK in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 67-6 (June 2026)  

Public ISBD [article]  inJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 67-6 (June 2026) . - p.869-880 Titre : The stability of the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule-2 in children aged 14–36 months with elevated likelihood for autism Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Sarah SCHAUBROECK, Auteur ; Ellen DEMURIE, Auteur ; Jannath BEGUM-ALI, Auteur ; Sven BÖLTE, Auteur ; Sofie BOTERBERG, Auteur ; Jan BUITELAAR, Auteur ; Tony CHARMAN, Auteur ; Terje FALCK-YTTER, Auteur ; Sabine HUNNIUS, Auteur ; Mark H. JOHNSON, Auteur ; Emily JONES, Auteur ; Iris OOSTERLING, Auteur ; Greg PASCO, Auteur ; Mirjam PIJL, Auteur ; Carlijn VAN DEN BOOMEN, Auteur ; Petra WARREYN, Auteur ; Herbert ROEYERS, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.869-880 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Autism  stability  ADOS  diagnosis  EL-siblings Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background This study investigated the stability of Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, Second Edition (ADOS-2) classifications in a cohort of 304 siblings at elevated likelihood for autism (EL-siblings). Methods ADOS-2 assessments were conducted at 14, 24 and 36?months, with Clinical Best Estimate (CBE) autism diagnoses determined at 36?months. Results Our findings indicate that while some children have stable ADOS-2 classifications from early on, a significant proportion of the children show inconsistent classifications over time. The overall stability of ADOS-2 autism spectrum classifications increased from 14 to 36?months and agreement with CBE autism clinical diagnosis was moderate and increased with age. Conclusions Caution is warranted when interpreting individual ADOS-2 results, as they should always complement, and can never replace, a comprehensive clinical evaluation. These findings highlight the importance of continued follow-up beyond 14?months in young EL-children, a group for whom early assessment may be both feasible and beneficial and emphasises the need to integrate multiple assessment measures and multiple informants for accurate early autism identification. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.70078 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=587 [article] The stability of the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule-2 in children aged 14–36 months with elevated likelihood for autism [texte imprimé] / Sarah SCHAUBROECK, Auteur ; Ellen DEMURIE, Auteur ; Jannath BEGUM-ALI, Auteur ; Sven BÖLTE, Auteur ; Sofie BOTERBERG, Auteur ; Jan BUITELAAR, Auteur ; Tony CHARMAN, Auteur ; Terje FALCK-YTTER, Auteur ; Sabine HUNNIUS, Auteur ; Mark H. JOHNSON, Auteur ; Emily JONES, Auteur ; Iris OOSTERLING, Auteur ; Greg PASCO, Auteur ; Mirjam PIJL, Auteur ; Carlijn VAN DEN BOOMEN, Auteur ; Petra WARREYN, Auteur ; Herbert ROEYERS, Auteur . - p.869-880. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 67-6 (June 2026) . - p.869-880 Mots-clés : Autism  stability  ADOS  diagnosis  EL-siblings Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background This study investigated the stability of Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, Second Edition (ADOS-2) classifications in a cohort of 304 siblings at elevated likelihood for autism (EL-siblings). Methods ADOS-2 assessments were conducted at 14, 24 and 36?months, with Clinical Best Estimate (CBE) autism diagnoses determined at 36?months. Results Our findings indicate that while some children have stable ADOS-2 classifications from early on, a significant proportion of the children show inconsistent classifications over time. The overall stability of ADOS-2 autism spectrum classifications increased from 14 to 36?months and agreement with CBE autism clinical diagnosis was moderate and increased with age. Conclusions Caution is warranted when interpreting individual ADOS-2 results, as they should always complement, and can never replace, a comprehensive clinical evaluation. These findings highlight the importance of continued follow-up beyond 14?months in young EL-children, a group for whom early assessment may be both feasible and beneficial and emphasises the need to integrate multiple assessment measures and multiple informants for accurate early autism identification. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.70078 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=587

---

1 (1 - 1 / 1) Par page : 25 50 100 200