Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur J. S. CHAN |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (1)
Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
Comparison of DSM-IV-TR and DSM-5 Criteria in Diagnosing Autism Spectrum Disorders in Singapore / M. SUNG in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 48-10 (October 2018)
[article]
Titre : Comparison of DSM-IV-TR and DSM-5 Criteria in Diagnosing Autism Spectrum Disorders in Singapore Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : M. SUNG, Auteur ; T. J. GOH, Auteur ; B. L. J. TAN, Auteur ; J. S. CHAN, Auteur ; H. S. A. LIEW, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.3273-3281 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Autism Spectrum Disorders Dsm-5 Dsm-iv-tr Diagnosis Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Our study examines the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-Fifth Edition (DSM-5) and Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) when applied concurrently against the best estimate clinical diagnoses for 110 children (5.1-19.6 years old) referred for diagnostic assessments of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) in a Singaporean outpatient speciality clinic. DSM-IV-TR performed slightly better, yielding sensitivity of 0.946 and specificity of 0.889, compared to DSM-5 (sensitivity = 0.837; specificity = 0.833). When considering the ASD sub-categories, sensitivity ranged from 0.667 to 0.933, and specificity ranged from 0.900 to 0.975. More participants with a PDD-NOS best estimate clinical diagnosis (40%) were misclassified on DSM-5. Merits and weaknesses to both classification systems, and implications for access to services and policy changes are discussed. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3594-x Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=369
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 48-10 (October 2018) . - p.3273-3281[article] Comparison of DSM-IV-TR and DSM-5 Criteria in Diagnosing Autism Spectrum Disorders in Singapore [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / M. SUNG, Auteur ; T. J. GOH, Auteur ; B. L. J. TAN, Auteur ; J. S. CHAN, Auteur ; H. S. A. LIEW, Auteur . - p.3273-3281.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 48-10 (October 2018) . - p.3273-3281
Mots-clés : Autism Spectrum Disorders Dsm-5 Dsm-iv-tr Diagnosis Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Our study examines the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-Fifth Edition (DSM-5) and Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) when applied concurrently against the best estimate clinical diagnoses for 110 children (5.1-19.6 years old) referred for diagnostic assessments of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) in a Singaporean outpatient speciality clinic. DSM-IV-TR performed slightly better, yielding sensitivity of 0.946 and specificity of 0.889, compared to DSM-5 (sensitivity = 0.837; specificity = 0.833). When considering the ASD sub-categories, sensitivity ranged from 0.667 to 0.933, and specificity ranged from 0.900 to 0.975. More participants with a PDD-NOS best estimate clinical diagnosis (40%) were misclassified on DSM-5. Merits and weaknesses to both classification systems, and implications for access to services and policy changes are discussed. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3594-x Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=369