Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Kjersti Åby BERGQUIST |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (1)
Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
The psychometric properties of the Norwegian version of the social responsiveness scale in a neuropediatric sample / Sabine KAISER in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 95 (July 2022)
[article]
Titre : The psychometric properties of the Norwegian version of the social responsiveness scale in a neuropediatric sample Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Sabine KAISER, Auteur ; Kjersti Åby BERGQUIST, Auteur ; Marianne BERG HALVORSEN, Auteur Article en page(s) : 101973 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Assessment Autism spectrum disorder Neurodevelopmental disorder Psychometrics Social responsiveness scale Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background The current study is an examination of the psychometric properties of the Norwegian Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS), a measure of deficits in social behavior, in a neuropediatric outpatient sample of children and adolescents with neurological and neurodevelopmental disorders. Method The internal consistency of the SRS, the convergent validity of the SRS with the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale-II (VABS-II), the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), and the Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) were examined, in addition to four different factor models of the SRS (i.e., a one-factor, the original five-factor, a second-order five-factor model, and a 16-item one-factor model) using confirmatory factor analyses. Results There was satisfactory internal consistency on all subscales, except for the Social Awareness subscale. The SRS showed a somewhat meaningful overlap with parts of the related scales on the VABS-II, the SDQ, and the ABC. Model fit indices were mixed for evaluating the four different factor models. Overall, however, the model fit was rather poor. Conclusions The original SRS subscales showed adequate internal consistency and satisfactory convergent validity on some of the subscales. The construct validity in terms of factor structure was not acceptable. Future research should examine the psychometric properties of an improved version of the SRS, especially in terms of improving the scale?s construct validity. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2022.101973 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=475
in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders > 95 (July 2022) . - 101973[article] The psychometric properties of the Norwegian version of the social responsiveness scale in a neuropediatric sample [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Sabine KAISER, Auteur ; Kjersti Åby BERGQUIST, Auteur ; Marianne BERG HALVORSEN, Auteur . - 101973.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders > 95 (July 2022) . - 101973
Mots-clés : Assessment Autism spectrum disorder Neurodevelopmental disorder Psychometrics Social responsiveness scale Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background The current study is an examination of the psychometric properties of the Norwegian Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS), a measure of deficits in social behavior, in a neuropediatric outpatient sample of children and adolescents with neurological and neurodevelopmental disorders. Method The internal consistency of the SRS, the convergent validity of the SRS with the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale-II (VABS-II), the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), and the Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) were examined, in addition to four different factor models of the SRS (i.e., a one-factor, the original five-factor, a second-order five-factor model, and a 16-item one-factor model) using confirmatory factor analyses. Results There was satisfactory internal consistency on all subscales, except for the Social Awareness subscale. The SRS showed a somewhat meaningful overlap with parts of the related scales on the VABS-II, the SDQ, and the ABC. Model fit indices were mixed for evaluating the four different factor models. Overall, however, the model fit was rather poor. Conclusions The original SRS subscales showed adequate internal consistency and satisfactory convergent validity on some of the subscales. The construct validity in terms of factor structure was not acceptable. Future research should examine the psychometric properties of an improved version of the SRS, especially in terms of improving the scale?s construct validity. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2022.101973 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=475